A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients

Summary

The presence of a clot – even asymptomatic – in the proximal lower limb veins of a patient with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) provides evidence for venous thromboembolism and indicates anticoagulant therapy in such patients. We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of compression ultrasonography as compared to multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) for the diagnosis of PE. We analyzed data from a large outcome management study that included consecutive outpatients referred to the emergency ward with clinically suspected PE. All high clinical probability patients, and all non-high clinical probability patients with a positive D-dimer test underwent both MSCT and CUS. Of the 756 included patients, 232 had PE ruled out on the basis of a negative D-dimer test, and 524 patients underwent both MSCT and CUS. PE was found in 187 out of the 511 patients witha conclusive MSCT. The sensitivity of CUS for the presence of PE on MSCT was 39% (95% confidence interval: 32 to 46%), and its specificity was 99% (95% CI:97 to 100%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 42.2 (95% CI: 13.5 to 131.9) and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5 to 0.7), respectively. We conclude from that large study of unselected patients that CUS has high specificity but low sensitivity, for the diagnosis of PE at MSCT in suspected patients. It allows ruling in the diagnosis of PE without further invasive and/or expensive testing in suspected patients.

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism - deep vein thrombosis - diagnosis - compression ultrasonography

• References

• 1 Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O. et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1760-8.
• 2 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 1044-9.
• 3 Wells PS, Lensing AW, Davidson BL. et al. Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after orthopedic surgery. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 47-53.
• 4 Bressollette L, Nonent M, Oger E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of compression ultrasonography for the detection of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in medical patients. The TADEUS project. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 529-33.
• 5 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron Mjet. al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-5.
• 6 Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G. et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 2002; 360: 1914-20.
• 7 Eng J, Krishnan JA, Segal JB. et al. Accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic literature review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1819-27.
• 8 Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS. et al. Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology 2004; 233: 806-15.
• 9 Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH. et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 2012-7.
• 10 Writing Group for the Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006; 295: 172-9.
• 11 Schoepf UJ. Computed tomography for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: the making of a reference standard. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 03: 1924-5.
• 12 Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF. et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 92-7.
• 13 Le Gal G, Prins AM, Righini M. et al. Diagnostic value of a negative single complete compression ultrasound of the lower limbs to exclude the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in pregnant or postpartum women: A retrospective hospital-based study. Thromb Res. 2006 in press (doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2005.12.004).
• 14 Righini M, Le Gal G, Perrier A. et al. The challenge of diagnosing pulmonary embolism in elderly patients: influence of age on commonly used diagnostic tests and strategies. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 1039-45.
• 15 van Strijen MJL, de Monye W, Schiereck J. et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: A multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 307-14.
• 16 van Beek EJ, Reekers JA, Batchelor DA. et al. Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 1996; 06: 415-9.
• 17 Turkstra F, Kuijer PMM, van Beek EJR. et al. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 775-81.
• 18 Girard P, Sanchez O, Leroyer C. et al. for the Evaluation du Scanner Spirale dans l’Embolie Pulmonaire Study Group. Deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical significance. Chest 2005; 128: 1593-1600.
• 19 Elias A, Colombier D, Victor G. et al. Diagnostic performance of complete lower limb venous ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2004; 91: 187-95.
• 20 Girard P, Musset D, Parent F. et al. High prevalence of detectable deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1999; 116: 903-8.
• 21 Wicki J, Perrier A, Perneger T. et al. Predicting adverse outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a risk score. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 548-52.