A thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptor antagonist (S18886) shows high antithrombotic efficacy in an experimental model of stent-induced thrombosis
Gemma Vilahur
1
Cardiovascular Research Center, CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
,
Laura Casaní
1
Cardiovascular Research Center, CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
,
Lina Badimon
1
Cardiovascular Research Center, CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
› Author AffiliationsFinancial support:This study was supported by funds provided by Servier (Paris, France), CB06/03 and Plan Nacional SAF 2006/10091.
Acute thrombosis is a threat in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Our objective was to determine if stent-induced thrombus formation could be inhibited by oral treatment with a thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptor antagonist (TPr; S18886) as an alternative to standard therapy. Pigs were allocated in the following treatment (p.o) groups: I) clopidogrel (CLOP); II) ASA; III) S18886; IV) ASA+CLOP; and V) placebo-control. Damaged vessel was placed in the Badimon chamber containing a stent and perfused at 212/s.Antithrombotic effects were assessed as 111In-platelet deposition (PD) in two series (60 and 180 min after drug intake). Fibrin(ogen) deposition, light transmittance aggregometry (LTA; collagen, U46619, and ADP), and bleeding time (BT) were also evaluated. After 60 min S18886 reduced PD ≤48%, 40%, and 35% vs placebo, CLOP-, and ASA-treated ani mals, respectively (P<0.05), while ASA+CLOP showed a 58% reduction versus placebo (P<0.01).After 3 hours, ASA+CLOP decreased PD by 55%, S18886 by 40%, CLOP alone by 28% (P>0.05), and ASA showed no inhibition versus placebo. Similar effects were found in S18886– and ASA+CLOP-treated animals at both times. Fibrin(ogen) deposition followed the same pattern. Collagen-induced LTA was significantly reduced by ASA, ASA+CLOP, and S18886; S18886 abolished U46619-induced LTA; and, CLOP±ASA reduced ADP-induced LTA in a time-dependent manner. TPr blockade did not prolong BT, whereas CLOP±ASA significantly did (P<0.0001). In conclusion, blockade of theTPr provided a fast and potent platelet inhibitory effect in a porcine model of in-stent thrombosis comparable to that of blocking both the ADP receptor and cyclooxygenase activation; in addition,TPr provided a more favorable bleeding risk profile.
Keywords
Thrombosis -
thromboxane -
aspirin plus clopidogrel -
stents
References
1
Schomig A,
Kastrati A,
Mudra H.
et al.
Four-year experience with Palmaz-Schatz stenting in coronary angioplasty complicated by dissection with threatened or present vessel closure. Circulation 1994; 90: 2716-2724.
2
Lau KW,
Hung JS,
Sigwart U.
The current status of stent placement in small coronary arteries < 3.0 mm in diameter. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 411-416.
3
Baigent C,
Collins R,
Appleby P.
et al.
ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1337-1343.
5
Sabatine MS,
Cannon CP,
Gibson CM.
et al.
Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics: the PCICLARITY study. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 294: 1224-1232.
6 Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. Br Med J 2002; 324: 71-86.
7 A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-1339.
8
Yusuf S,
Zhao F,
Mehta SR.
et al.
Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494-502.
9
Steinhubl SR,
Berger PB,
Mann JT.
3rd, et al.
Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 288: 2411-2420.
12
Moussa I,
Oetgen M,
Roubin G.
et al.
Effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation. Circulation 1999; 99: 2364-2366.
13
Bhatt DL,
Bertrand ME,
Berger PB.
et al.
Metaanalysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 9-14.
14
Hongo RH,
Ley J,
Dick SE.
et al.
The effect of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin when given before coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 231-237.
15
Harrington RA,
Becker RC,
Ezekowitz M.
et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126: 513S-548S.
16
Montalescot G,
Sideris G,
Meuleman C.
et al.
A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 931-938.
17
Gurbel P,
Malinin A,
Callahan K.
et al.
Effect of loading with clopidogrel at the time of coronary stenting on platelet aggregation and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa expression and platelet-leukocyte aggregate formation. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 312-315.
19
Cayatte AJ,
Du Y,
Oliver-Krasinski J.
et al.
The thromboxane receptor antagonist S18886 but not aspirin inhibits atherogenesis in apo E-deficient mice: evidence that eicosanoids other than thromboxane contribute to atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 1724-1728.
20
Osende JI,
Shimbo D,
Fuster V.
et al.
Antithrombotic effects of S 18886, a novel orally active thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 492-498.
21
Maalej N,
Osman HE,
Shanmuganayagam D.
et al.
Antithrombotic properties of the thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptor antagonist S18886 on prevention of platelet-dependent cyclic flow reductions in dogs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2005; 45: 389-395.
22
Gaussem P,
Reny JL,
Thalamas C.
et al.
The specific thromboxane receptor antagonist S18886: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 1437-1445.
23
Belhassen L,
Pelle G,
Dubois-Rande JL.
et al.
Improved endothelial function by the thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist S 18886 in patients with coronary artery disease treated with aspirin. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1198-1204.
24
Verbeuren TJ,
Vallez MO,
Lavielle G.
et al.
Activation of thromboxane receptors and the induction of vasomotion in the hamster cheek pouch microcirculation. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 122: 859-866.
25
Rukshin V,
Azarbal B,
Finkelstein A.
et al.
Effects of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor tirofiban (aggrastat) in ex vivo canine arteriovenous shunt model of stent thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2003; 41: 615-624.
26
Badimon L,
Turitto V,
Rosemark JA.
et al.
Characterization of a tubular flow chamber for studying platelet interaction with biologic and prosthetic materials: deposition of indium 111-labeled platelets on collagen, subendothelium, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. J Lab Clin Med 1987; 110: 706-718.
27
Meyer BJ,
Badimon JJ,
Chesebro JH.
et al.
Dissolution of mural thrombus by specific thrombin inhibition with r-hirudin: comparison with heparin and aspirin. Circulation 1998; 97: 681-685.
28
Badimon L,
Badimon JJ,
Galvez A.
et al.
Influence of arterial damage and wall shear rate on platelet deposition. Ex vivo study in a swine model. Arteriosclerosis 1986; 6: 312-320.
31
Makkar RR,
Eigler NL,
Kaul S.
et al.
Effects of clopidogrel, aspirin and combined therapy in a porcine ex vivo model of high-shear induced stent thrombosis. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1538-1546.
33
Mertz E.
The anomaly of a normal Duke’s and a very prolonged saline bleeding time in swine suffering from an inherited bleeding disease. Am J Physiol 1942; 136: 360-362.
34
Moses JW,
Leon MB,
Popma JJ.
et al.
Sirolimuseluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1315-1323.
35
Lemos PA,
Lee CH,
Degertekin M.
et al.
Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 2093-2099.
36
Gurbel PA,
Bliden KP,
Hiatt BL.
et al.
Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003; 107: 2908-2913.
37
Grossmann R,
Sokolova O,
Schnurr A.
et al.
Variable extent of clopidogrel responsiveness in patients after coronary stenting. Thromb Haemost 2004; 92: 1201-1206.
38
Angiolillo DJ,
Fernandez-Ortiz A,
Bernardo E.
et al.
High clopidogrel loading dose during coronary stenting: effects on drug response and interindividual variability. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1903-1910.
39
Patti G,
Colonna G,
Pasceri V.
et al.
Randomized trial of high loading dose of clopidogrel for reduction of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA- 2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study. Circulation 2005; 111: 2099-2106.
40
Morawietz H,
Breier G.
Endothelial cell biology: an update. 5th International Symposium on the Biology of Endothelial Cells. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 1025-1030.
41
Penglis PS,
Cleland LG,
Demasi M.
et al.
Differential regulation of prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane A2 production in human monocytes: implications for the use of cyclooxygenase inhibitors. J Immunol 2000; 165: 1605-1611.
42
Vejar M,
Fragasso G,
Hackett D.
et al.
Dissociation of platelet activation and spontaneous myocardial ischemia in unstable angina. Thromb Haemost 1990; 63: 163-168.