The physician’s estimation ‘alternative diagnosis is less likely than pulmonary embolism’ in the Wells rule is dependent on the presence of other required items

• References

• 1 Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR. et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 997-1005.
• 2 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodgers M. et al. derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with simpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 416-420.
• 3 Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF. et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 92-97.
• 4 Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy P-M. et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 165-171.
• 5 van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV. et al. Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 295: 172-179.
• 6 Kruip MJ, Slob MJ, Schijen JH. et al. Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1631-1635.
• 7 Leclercq MG, Lutisan JG, van Marwijk Kooy M. et al. Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: a management study. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89: 97-103.
• 8 Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW. et al. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells’ simplified decision rule. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 146-150.
• 9 Leclerq MGL, Kruip MJHA, Mac Gillavry MR. et al. Observer variability in the assessment of clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1204-1206.
• 10 Testuz A, Le Gal G, Righini M. et al. Influence of specific alternative diagnoses on the probability of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 958-962.
• 11 Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D. et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2002; 113: 269-275.
• 12 Klok FA, Karami Djurabi R, Nijkeuter M. et al. Alternative diagnosis other than pulmonary embolism as a subjective variable in Wells clinical decision rule; not so bad after all. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 1079-1080.
• 13 Klok FA, Kruijswijk E, Spaan J. et al. Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Oct 20 [Epub ahead of print]