SYNTAX, STS and EuroSCORE – How good are they for risk estimation in atherosclerotic heart disease?

Summary

Tests that enable prediction of adverse outcome after surgical or nonsurgical intervention in cardiac patients are of great importance since they can help guide clinical decision making. The new evolving percutaneous therapeutic techniques combined with the currently available risk scoring systems require improved prediction models. In the context of steadily improving surgical techniques and perioperative care, on the one hand, and the inadequacy of regional patient data sets to provide generally applicable risk prediction base, on the other, there is need for adaption and recalibration of scoring systems some of which are partly outdated but still widely in use. The accuracy of predictive models depends on their proper application as well as the knowledge of their individual strengths and weaknesses. The EuroSCORE and the STS score take into consideration some risk factors associated with mortality, whereas the SYNTAX score relies solely on coronary anatomy and lesion characteristics. A combination of selected score components from the EuroSCORE, assessing the mortality risk, and those from the SYNTAX score, reflecting the coronary artery disease complexity, can be expected to yield more accurate results in estimating risk in individual patients. In this review, the predictive ability of the SYNTAX score, the STS score and the EuroSCORE will be discussed.

Keywords

Surgery - cardiology - risk factors

• References

• 1 Dahloef B. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Epidemiology and Risk Assessment. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105 Suppl 3A-9A.
• 2 Stammler J, Wentworth D, Neaton JD. Is relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? Findings in 356,222 primary screenings of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). J Am Med Assoc 1986; 256: 2823-2828.
• 3 Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP. et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 987-1003.
• 4 Graham I, Atar D, Borch Johnsen. et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2375-2414.
• 5 Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Hoglund P. et al. Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models on open-heart surgery. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 867-874.
• 6 Kolh P. Importance of risk stratification models in cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 768-769.
• 7 Granton J, Cheng D. Risk Stratification models for Cardiac Surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2008; 12: 167-174.
• 8 Petrou M, Roques F, Sharples LD. et al. The risk model of choice for coronary surgery in the UK. Heart 2003; 89: 98-99.
• 9 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
• 10 Geissler H, Hölzl P, Marohl S. et al. Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2000; 17: 400-406.
• 11 Nashef S, Roques F, Gauducheau Michel P. et al. The EuroSCORE study group. European system of cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 1999; 16: 9-13.
• 12 Roques F, Nashef S, Michel P. et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 1999; 15: 816-823.
• 13 Bhatti F, Grayson AD, Grotte G. et al. The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: hoe well does it predict operative risk?. Heart 2006; 92: 1817-1820.
• 14 Gogbashian A, Sedrakayan A, Treasure T. EuroSCORE: a systematic review of international performance. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2004; 25: 695-700.
• 15 Keogh BE, Kinsman R. The society of cardiothoracic surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland: National adult cardiac surgical database report. 2000-2001
• 16 Nashef SAM, Roques F, Michel P. et al. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1-2.
• 17 Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR. et al. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 881-882.
• 18 Michel P, Roques F, Nashef SA. Logistic or additive EuroSCORE for high-risk patients?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23: 684-687.
• 19 Yap Ch, Reid C, Yii M. et al. Validation of the EuroSCORE model in Australia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 441-446.
• 20 Antunes M. The EuroSCORE - 10 years later. Time to change?. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2010; 37: 253-254.
• 21 Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Hoglund P. et al. EuroSCORE predicts intensive care unit stay and costs of open heart surgery. Ann Throac Surg 2004; 78: 1528-1534.
• 22 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Executive Summary: Society of Thoracic Surgeons Spring 2007 Report. Chicago, IL: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons; 2007
• 23 Shroyer LA, Coombs LP, Peterson ED. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 1856-1865.
• 24 Shahian D, O’Brian S, Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1 - Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: S2-S22.
• 25 O’Brian S, Shahian D, Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2- Isolated Valve Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: S23-42.
• 26 Shahian D, O’Brian S, Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 3 - Valve Plus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: S43-62.
• 27 Wendt D, Osswald B, Kayser K. et al. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score Is Superior to the EuroSCORE Determining Mortality in High Risk Patients Undergoing Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 468-475.
• 28 Sianos G, Morel M- A, Kappetein A. et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading to complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroInterv 2005; 1: 219-227.
• 29 Dawkins K, Morel M-A, Serruys P. Counting the score: the SYNTAX Score and coronary risk. EuroIntervention 2009; 5: 33-35.
• 30 American Heart Association Grading Committee. Coronary Artery Disease Reporting System. Circulation 1975; 51: 31-33.
• 31 Leaman DM, Brower RW, Meester GT. et al. Coronary artery atherosclerosis: severity of angina pectoris and compromised left ventricular function. Circulation 1981; 63: 285-299.
• 32 Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM. et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (subcommittee on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). Circulation 1988; 78: 486-502.
• 33 Hamburger JN, Serruys PW, Scarbra-Gomes R. et al. Recanalization of total coronary occlusions using a laser guidewire (the European TOTAL Surveillance Study). Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1419-1423.
• 34 Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC. et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 274-283.
• 35 Capodanno D, DI Salvo E, Cincotta G. et al. Usefulness of the SYNTAX Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation: Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 302-308.
• 36 Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C. et al. EuroSCORE as predictor of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2009; 95: 43-48.
• 37 Lehmann R, Fichtlscherer S, Schächinger V. et al. Favorable Long -Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Multivessel-PCI compared to Predicted Prognosis of CABG Estimated by EuroSCORE: Procedural and Clinical Determinants of Long-Term Outcome. J Interv Cardiol 2009; 22: 511-519.
• 38 Lehmann R, Fichtlscherer S, Schächtinger V. et al. Clinical Risk Stratification is a Better Determinant of Long-term Survival Following Multivessel PCI Compared to Anatomic Risk Stratification Using the SYNTAX-Score. Circulation 2010; 122: A18148.
• 39 Garg S, Sarno G, Garcia-Garcia H. et al. A New Tool for the Risk Stratification of Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation: Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 317-326.
• 40 Garg S, Girasis C, Sarno G. et al. The SYNTAX Score Revisited: A Reassessment of the SYNTAX Score Reproducibility. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 946-952.
• 41 Nissinen J, Biancari F, Wistbacka J- O. et al. Is it possible to improve the accuracy of EuroSCORE?. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2009; 36: 799-806.
• 42 Garg S, Serruys P. Coronary angioplastiy: de we need to EuroSCORE?. Nature Rev Cardiol 2009; 6: 267-268.
• 43 de Mulder M, Gitt A, van Domburg R. et al. EuroHeart score for the evaluation of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2011 Epub ahead of print
• 44 Holzhey D, Luduena M, Rastan A. et al. Is the SYNTAX Score a Predictor of Long-term Outcome after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?. Heart Surg Forum 2010; 13: E143-E148.
• 45 Serruys P, Morice M-C, Kappetein P. et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease. New Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-972.
• 46 Lemesle G, Bonello L, De Labriolle A. et al. Prognostic Value of the Syntax Score in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Three-Vessel coronary Disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 612-617.
• 47 Parolari A, Pesce L, Trezzi M. et al. Performance of EuroSCORE in CABG and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: single institution experience and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 297-304.
• 48 Dewey T, Brown D, Ryan W. et al. Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 180-187.
• 49 Kalavrouziotis D, Li D, Buth K. et al. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation( EuroSCORE) is not appropriate for withholding surgery in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 4: 32.
• 50 Parolari A, Pesce L, Trezzi M. et al. EuroSCORE Performance in Valve Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 787-793.
• 51 Kobayashi K, Williams J, Nwakanma L. et al. EuroSCORE Predicts Short- and Mid-Term Mortality in Combined Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients. J Card Surg 2009; 24: 637-643.
• 52 Piazza N, Wenaweser P, Van Gameren M. et al. Relationship between the logistic EuroSCORE and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score in patients implanted with the CoreValve ReValving System-A Bern-Rotterdam Study. Am Heart J 2010; 159: 323-329.
• 53 Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K. et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2007; 116: 755-763.
• 54 Fellahi J-L, Daccache G, Rubes D. et al. Does preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide better predict adverse outcome and prolonged length of stay than the standard European system of cardiac operative risk evaluation after cardiac surgery?. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesthesia 2011; 25: 256-262.
• 55 Sündermann S, Dademasch A, Praetorius J. et al. Comprehensive assessment of frailty for elderly high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2011; 39: 33-37.
• 56 Roques F, Naschef S, Michel P. et al. The EuroSCORE Study Group. Does EuroSCORE work in individual European countries?. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2000; 18: 27-30.
• 57 Choong C, Sergant P, Nashef S. et al The EuroSCORE risk stratification system in the current era: how accurate is it and what should be done if it is inaccurate?. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2009; 35: 54-61.