Oral anticoagulation use by patients with atrial fibrillation in Germany

Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common significant cardiac rhythm disorder. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended by guidelines in the presence of a moderate to high risk of stroke. Based on an analysis of claims-based data, the aim of this contribution is to quantify the stroke-risk dependent OAC utilisation profile of German AF patients as well as the possible causes and the associated clinical outcomes of OAC under-use. Our data set was derived from two large mandatory German medical insurance funds. Risk stratification of patients was based on the CHADS2-score and the CHA2DS2-VASc-score. Two different scenarios were constructed to deal with factors potentially disfavouring OAC use. Causes of OAC under-use and its clinical consequences were analysed using multivariate analysis. Observation year was 2008. A total of 183,448 AF patients met the inclusion criteria. This represents an AF prevalence of 2.21%. The average CHADS2-score was 2.8 (CHA2DS2-VASc-score: 4.3). On between 40.5 and 48.7% of the observed patient-days, there was no antithrombotic protection by OAC, other anticoagulants or aspirin. Older female patients with a high number of comorbidities had a higher risk of OAC under-use. Patients who had already experienced a thromboembolic event had a lower risk of OAC under-use. In the observation year, 3,367 patients experienced a stroke (incidence rate 1.8%). In our multi-level Poisson random effects estimate, OAC use decreases the stroke rate by almost 80% (IRR 0.236). In conclusion, OAC under-use is widespread in the German market. It is associated with severe clinical consequences.

Keywords

Vitamin K-dependent factors - antiplatelet agents - management of disease

• References

• 1 Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A. et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 949-953.
• 2 Schnabel RB, Sullivan LM, Levy D. et al. Development of a risk score for atrial fibrillation (Framingham Heart Study): a community-based cohort study. Lancet 2009; 373: 739-745.
• 3 Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y. et al. ATRIA Study Group. Comparison of risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 810-815.
• 4 European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY. et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369-2429.
• 5 Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS. et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2011; 123: e269-367.
• 6 Singer DE, Albers GW, Dalen JE. et al. American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (06) 546S-592S.
• 7 Lip GY, Rudolf M, Kakar P. Management of atrial fibrillation: the NICE guidelines. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 9-11.
• 8 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. et al. RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151.
• 9 Andersen KK, Olsen TS. Reduced poststroke mortality in patients with stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants: results from a Danish quality-control registry of 22,179 patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 259-263.
• 10 Gorin L, Fauchier L, Nonin E. et al. Antithrombotic treatment and the risk of death and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score=1. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 833-840.
• 11 Boulanger L, Hauch O, Friedman M. et al. Warfarin exposure and the risk of thromboembolic and major bleeding events among medicaid patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40: 1024-1029.
• 12 Szucs TD, Bramkamp M. Pharmacoeconomics of anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a review. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 1180-1185.
• 13 Miller PS, Andersson FL, Kalra L. Are cost benefits of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation underestimated?. Stroke 2005; 36: 360-366.
• 14 Hughes M, Lip GY. Stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of stroke risk factors, risk stratification schema and cost effectiveness data. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99: 295-304.
• 15 Rowan SB, Bailey DN, Bublitz CE. et al. Trends in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the U.S.: an analysis of the national ambulatory medical care survey database. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1561-1565.
• 16 Nieuwlaat R, Capucci A, Lip GY. et al. Euro Heart Survey Investigators. Antithrombotic treatment in real-life atrial fibrillation patients: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 3018-3026.
• 17 Ogilvie IM, Newton N, Welner SA. et al. Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 2010; 123: 638-645.
• 18 McBride D, Brüggenjürgen B, Roll S. et al. Anticoagulation treatment for the reduction of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a cohort study to examine the gap between guidelines and routine medical practice. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2007; 24: 65-72.
• 19 Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L. et al. Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin. Circulation 2004; 110: 2287-2292.
• 20 Lip GY. Implications of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED Scores for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 2011; 124: 111-114.
• 21 Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R. et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093-1100.
• 22 Open drug base. Available at: http://de.oddb.org/de/drugs/fachinfo/uid/86726 Accessed: 30. August 2011
• 23 Harley CR, Riedel AA, Hauch O. et al. Anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims data analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21: 215-222.
• 24 WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2011. Oslo. 2010
• 25 Bravata DM, Rosenbeck K, Kancir S. et al. The use of warfarin in veterans with atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2004; 4: 18.
• 26 Kirchhof P, Nabauer M, Gerth M. et al. Impact of the type of centre on management of AF patients: Surprising evidence for differences in antithrombotic therapy decisions. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 1010-1023.
• 27 Chae JW, Song CS, Kim H. et al. Prediction of mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis by Charlson Comorbidity Index using ICD-10 database. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 117: c379-84.
• 28 StataCorp. Stata 10 Base Reference Manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2007
• 29 StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2007
• 30 Srivastava A, Hudson M, Hamoud I. et al. Examining warfarin underutilization rates in patients with atrial fibrillation: Detailed chart review essential to capture contraindications to warfarin therapy. Thromb J 2008; 6: 6.
• 31 Khoo CW, Lip GY. Acute management of atrial fibrillation. Chest 2009; 135: 849-859.
• 32 DeWilde S, Carey IM, Emmas C, Richards N, Cook DG. Trends in the prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation, its treatment with anticoagulation and predictors of such treatment in UK primary care. Heart 2006; 92: 1064-1070.
• 33 Olesen JB, Lip GY, Hansen ML. et al. Validation of risk stratification schemes for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study. Br Med J 2011; 342: d124.
• 34 Bonnemeier H, Bosch RF, Kohlhaußen A. et al. Presentation of atrial fibrillation and its management by cardiologists in the ambulantory and hospital setting. Curr Med Res Opin 2011; 27: 995-1003.
• 35 Meinertz T, Kirch W, Rosin L. et al. Management of atrial fibrillation by primary care physicians in Germany: baseline results of the ATRIUM registry. Clin Res Cardiol 2011; 100: 897-905.
• 36 Lee S, Shafe ACE, Cowie MR. UK stroke incidence, mortality and cardiovascular risk management 1999-2008: time-trend analysis from the General Practice Research Database. Br Med J Open 2011; 2: e000269.
• 37 Wallentin L, DPhilb SY, Ezekowitz MD. et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 975-983.
• 38 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ. et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992.
• 39 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J. et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891.
• 40 Karthikeyan G, Eikelboom JW. The CHADS2 score for stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation - friend or foe?. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 45-48.
• 41 Keogh C, Wallace E, Dillon C. et al. Validation of the CHADS2 clinical prediction rule to predict ischaemic stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 528-538.
• 42 Abu-Assi E, Otero-Raviña F, Allut Vidal G. et al. on behalf of Grupo Barbanza researchers. Comparison of the reliability and validity of four contemporary risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2011 epub ahead of print.
• 43 Chao TF, Lin YJ, Tsao HM. et al. CHADS(2) and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores in the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2380-2385.
• 44 Crystal S, Akincigil A, Bilder S, Walkup JT. Studying prescription drug use and outcomes with medicaid claims data: strengths, limitations, and strategies. Med Care 2007; 45 (10) Suppl 2: 58-65.
• 45 Rawson NS, D‘Arcy C. Assessing the validity of diagnostic information in administrative health care utilization data: experience in Saskatchewan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7: 389-398.
• 46 Garcia DA, Lopes RD, Hylek EM. New-onset atrial fibrillation and warfarin initiation: high risk periods and implications for new antithrombotic drugs. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1099-1105.
• 47 Lip GY, Andreotti F, Fauchier L. et al. Bleeding risk assessment and management in atrial fibrillation patients. Executive Summary of a Position Document from the European Heart Rhythm Association [EHRA], endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology [ESC] Working Group on Thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 997-1011.
• 48 Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N. et al. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Data Syst Rev 2008; 2: CD000011.
• 49 Peterson AM, Nau DP, Cramer JA. et al. A checklist for medication compliance and persistence studies using retrospective databases. Value Health 2007; 10: 3-12.
• 50 Mazzaglia G, Filippi A, Alacqua M. et al. A national survey of the management of atrial fibrillation with antithrombotic drugs in Italian primary care. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 968-975.