Thromb Haemost 2013; 109(05): 920-929
DOI: 10.1160/TH12-09-0666
Platelets and Blood Cells
Schattauer GmbH

Reduced antiplatelet effect of aspirin is associated with low-grade inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease

Sanne Bøjet Larsen
1   Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
,
Erik Lerkevang Grove
1   Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
,
Steen Dalby Kristensen
1   Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
2   Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
,
Anne-Mette Hvas
2   Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
3   Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
› Institutsangaben
Financial support: The study was financially supported be the Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation (grant no. 2101–05–0052), The Danish Heart Foundation, A.P. Møller Foundation, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, The Eva and Henry Fraenkel Foundation, The Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation, and The Sophus Jacobsen and Spouse Astrid Jacobsen Foundation.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 13. September 2012

Accepted after major revision: 23. Januar 2013

Publikationsdatum:
22. November 2017 (online)

Summary

Inflammation has been proposed to modify platelet function. This may lead to increased platelet reactivity and reduced antiplatelet drug efficacy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, this hypothesis has not been investigated in stable CAD patients receiving aspirin as mono antiplatelet therapy. It was the objective of this study to investigate the association between platelet reactivity, the inflammatory markers high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), and platelet activation. We performed a cross-sectional study on 524 stable high-risk CAD patients. Among these, 91% had a history of myocardial infarction, 23% had type 2 diabetes, and 13% had both. All patients received 75 mg aspirin daily as mono antiplatelet therapy. Platelet reactivity was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate®, MEA) and VerifyNow®. Inflammation was evaluated by hs-CRP and IL-6. Platelet activation was assessed by soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), and cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition was evaluated by measurement of serum thromboxane B2. Hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in upper platelet reactivity tertile patients than in lower platelet reactivity tertile patients (p≤0.02). Similar results were obtained with IL-6, though not statististically significant (p≥0.15). Platelet activation evaluated by sP-selectin was significantly higher in patients with MEA reactivity levels in the upper tertile than in the lower tertile (p=0.0001). Optimal compliance was confirmed by low serum thromboxane B2 levels in all patients. In conclusion, increased levels of hs-CRP were associated with augmented platelet reactivity in stable high-risk CAD patients receiving aspirin as mono antiplatelet therapy. These findings may suggest that chronic low-grade inflammation reduce the antiplatelet effect of aspirin.

 
  • References

  • 1 Arbab-Zadeh A, Nakano M, Virmani R. et al. Acute coronary events. Circulation 2012; 125: 1147-1156.
  • 2 Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 115-126.
  • 3 Krasopoulos G, Brister SJ, Beattie WS. et al. Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2008; 336: 195-198.
  • 4 Snoep JD, Hovens MM, Eikenboom JC. et al. Association of laboratory-defined aspirin resistance with a higher risk of recurrent cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1593-1599.
  • 5 Battistoni A, Rubattu S, Volpe M. Circulating biomarkers with preventive, diagnostic and prognostic implications in cardiovascular diseases. Int J Cardiol 2012; 157: 160-168.
  • 6 Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM. et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1387-1397.
  • 7 Lindmark E, Diderholm E, Wallentin L. et al. Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 286: 2107-2113.
  • 8 Bernlochner I, Steinhubl S, Braun S. et al. Association between inflammatory biomarkers and platelet aggregation in patients under chronic clopidogrel treatment. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1193-1200.
  • 9 Ge H, Zhou Y, Liu X. et al. Relationship between plasma inflammatory markers and platelet aggregation in patients with clopidogrel resistance after angioplasty. Angiology 2012; 63: 62-66.
  • 10 Geisler T, Mueller K, Aichele S. et al. Impact of inflammatory state and metabolic control on responsiveness to dual antiplatelet therapy in type 2 diabetics after PCI: prognostic relevance of residual platelet aggregability in diabetics undergoing coronary interventions. Clin Res Cardiol 2010; 99: 743-752.
  • 11 Gori AM, Cesari F, Marcucci R. et al. The balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is associated with platelet aggregability in acute coronary syndrome patients. Atherosclerosis 2009; 202: 255-262.
  • 12 Muller K, Aichele S, Herkommer M. et al. Impact of inflammatory markers on platelet inhibition and cardiovascular outcome including stent thrombosis in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2010; 213: 256-262.
  • 13 Park DW, Lee SW, Yun SC. et al. A point-of-care platelet function assay and C-reactive protein for prediction of major cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2630-2639.
  • 14 Schmidt M, Maeng M, Jakobsen CJ. et al. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: The Western Denmark Heart Registry. Clin Epidemiol 2010; 02: 137-144.
  • 15 Grove EL, Hvas AM, Johnsen HL. et al. A comparison of platelet function tests and thromboxane metabolites to evaluate aspirin response in healthy individuals and patients with coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 1245-1253.
  • 16 Grove EL, Hvas AM, Mortensen SB. et al. Effect of platelet turnover on whole blood platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 09: 185-191.
  • 17 Patrono C, Rocca B. Drug insight: aspirin resistance--fact or fashion?. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2007; 04: 42-50.
  • 18 Hanriot D, Bello G, Ropars A. et al. C-reactive protein induces pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, including activation of the liver X receptor alpha, on human monocytes. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99: 558-569.
  • 19 Nakagomi A, Freedman SB, Geczy CL. Interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide potentiate monocyte tissue factor induction by C-reactive protein: relationship with age, sex, and hormone replacement treatment. Circulation 2000; 101: 1785-1791.
  • 20 Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ. et al. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation 2000; 101: 1767-1772.
  • 21 Nurden AT. Platelets, inflammation and tissue regeneration. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105 (Suppl. 01) S13-S33.
  • 22 Wang J, Zhang S, Jin Y. et al. Elevated levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates and related circulating biomarkers in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2007; 115: 361-365.
  • 23 Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N. Soluble P-selectin and the risk of future cardiovascular events. Circulation 2001; 103: 491-495.
  • 24 Grove EL, Storey RF, Wurtz M. Platelet function testing in atherothrombotic disease. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18: 5344-5361.
  • 25 Patrono C. Aspirin resistance: definition, mechanisms and clinical read-outs. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 01: 1710-1713.
  • 26 Gremmel T, Perkmann T, Seidinger D. et al. Differential Impact of Inflammation on Five Laboratory Assays Detecting Aspirin Resistance. Circulation 2011; 124: A12698.