Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2014; 112(01): 10-11
DOI: 10.1160/TH14-03-0216
Current Controversies
Schattauer GmbH

There’s life in the old dog yet: Clopidogrel competing with prasugrel and ticagrelor for treatment of ACS patients

Dirk Sibbing
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
2   DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
,
Steffen Massberg
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
2   DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 March 2014

Accepted after minor revision: 11 March 2014

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

 

Invited Editorial Focus on Viewpoint Article by Serebruany and Fortmann. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112: 4-9..

 

  • References

  • 1 Tantry US. et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2261-2273.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wiviott SD. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wallentin L. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aradi D. et al. Impact of clopidogrel and potent P2Y 12 -inhibitors on mortality and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 93-101.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Serebruany V, Fortmann SD. Underutilization of novel antiplatelet agents: myths, generics, and challenged shareholder’s value. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112: 4-9.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Roe MT. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1297-1309.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Serebruany VL. Viewpoint: paradoxical excess mortality in the PLATO trial should be independently verified. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 752-759.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Serebruany VL, Atar D. Viewpoint: Central adjudication of myocardial infarction in outcome-driven clinical trials--common patterns in TRITON, RECORD, and PLATO?. Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 412-414.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Serebruany VL, DiNicolantonio JJ. Viewpoint: mismatch between the European and American guidelines on oral antiplatelet P2Y12 inhibitors after acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 5-10.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Verheugt FW. Outcomes of positive randomised controlled clinical trials: double-blind or double vision? Editorial on Serebruany, Atar: 'Viewpoint: Central adjudication of myocardial infarction in outcome-driven clinical trials--common patterns in TRITON, RECORD, and PLATO?' (Thromb Haemost 2012; 108.3). Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 410-411.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 James SK. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for non-invasive management: substudy from prospective randomised PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Br Med J 2011; 342: d3527.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hamm CW. et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Steg PG. et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569-2619.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cannon CP. et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study. Lancet 2010; 375: 283-293.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1172422/en/brilique accessed at 02/28/2014.
    PubMed
  • 16 Schulz S. et al. Randomized Comparison of Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Planned Invasive Strategy-Design and Rationale of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 Trial. J Cardiovasc Translat Res 2014; 07: 91-100.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ndrepepa G. et al. Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 690-697.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Antman EM. et al. Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 2028-2033.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-03/crf-tcr032612.php accessed at 02/28/2014.
    PubMed