Gene network analysis: from heart development to cardiac therapy

Summary

Networks offer a flexible framework to represent and analyse the complex interactions between components of cellular systems. In particular gene networks inferred from expression data can support the identification of novel hypotheses on regulatory processes. In this review we focus on the use of gene network analysis in the study of heart development. Understanding heart development will promote the elucidation of the aetiology of congenital heart disease and thus possibly improve diagnostics. Moreover, it will help to establish cardiac therapies. For example, understanding cardiac differentiation during development will help to guide stem cell differentiation required for cardiac tissue engineering or to enhance endogenous repair mechanisms. We introduce different methodological frameworks to infer networks from expression data such as Boolean and Bayesian networks. Then we present currently available temporal expression data in heart development and discuss the use of network-based approaches in published studies. Collectively, our literature-based analysis indicates that gene network analysis constitutes a promising opportunity to infer therapy-relevant regulatory processes in heart development. However, the use of network-based approaches has so far been limited by the small amount of samples in available datasets. Thus, we propose to acquire high-resolution temporal expression data to improve the mathematical descriptions of regulatory processes obtained with gene network inference methodologies. Especially probabilistic methods that accommodate the intrinsic variability of biological systems have the potential to contribute to a deeper understanding of heart development.

Keywords

Gene networks - temporal expression data - reverse engineering - heart development

• References

• 1 Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002; 295: 1662-1664.
• 2 Kirschner MW. The meaning of systems biology. Cell 2005; 121: 503-504.
• 3 Ideker T. et al. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2001; 2: 343-372.
• 4 Schlitt T, Brazma A. Modelling gene networks at different organisational levels. FEBS Lett 2005; 579: 1859-1866.
• 5 Wolfe CJ. et al. Systematic survey reveals general applicability of “guilt-by-as-sociation” within gene coexpression networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6: 227.
• 6 Peer D, Hacohen N. Principles and strategies for developing network models in cancer. Cell 2011; 144: 864-873.
• 7 Zhu X. et al. Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev 2007; 21: 1010-1024.
• 8 Davidson EH. et al. Regulatory gene networks and the properties of the developmental process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 1475-1480.
• 9 Wang X. et al. Gene module level analysis: identification to networks and dynamics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008; 19: 482-491.
• 10 Rotival M, Petretto E. Leveraging gene co-expression networks to pinpoint the regulation of complex traits and disease, with a focus on cardiovascular traits. Brief Funct Genomics 2014; 13: 66-78.
• 11 Segal E. et al. Learning module networks. J Mach Learn Res 2005; 6: 557-588.
• 12 Go AS. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: e28-e292.
• 13 Andersen TA. et al. Of mice and men: molecular genetics of congenital heart disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71: 1327-1352.
• 14 Sperling SR. Systems biology approaches to heart development and congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 2011; 91: 269-278.
• 15 Alexander JM, Bruneau BG. Lessons for cardiac regeneration and repair through development. Trends Mol Med 2010; 16: 426-434.
• 16 Mercola M. et al. Cardiac muscle regeneration: lessons from development. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 299-309.
• 17 Xin M. et al. Mending broken hearts: cardiac development as a basis for adult heart regeneration and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14: 529-541.
• 18 Patterson AJ, Zhang L. Hypoxia and fetal heart development. Curr Mol Med 2010; 10: 653-666.
• 19 Breckenridge RA. et al. Hypoxic regulation of hand1 controls the fetal-neonatal switch in cardiac metabolism. PLoS Biol 2013; 11: e1001666.
• 20 Degenhardt K. et al. New approaches under development: cardiovascular embryology applied to heart disease. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 71-74.
• 21 Yang X. et al. Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ Res 2014; 114: 511-523.
• 22 Poss KD. et al. Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 2002; 298: 2188-2190.
• 23 Oberpriller JO, Oberpriller JC. Response of the adult newt ventricle to injury. J Exp Zool 1974; 187: 249-253.
• 24 Porrello ER. et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 2011; 331: 1078-1080.
• 25 van Amerongen MJ, Engel FB. Features of cardiomyocyte proliferation and its potential for cardiac regeneration. J Cell Mol Med 2008; 12: 2233-2244.
• 26 Malone JH, Oliver B. Microarrays, deep sequencing and the true measure of the transcriptome. BMC Biol 2011; 9: 34.
• 27 Mutz KO. et al. Transcriptome analysis using next-generation sequencing. Curr Opin Biotech 2013; 24: 22-30.
• 28 McGettigan PA. Transcriptomics in the RNA-seq era. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013; 17: 4-11.
• 29 Oh S. et al. The analytical landscape of static and temporal dynamics in transcriptome data. Front Genet 2014; 5: 35.
• 30 Bar-Joseph Z. et al. Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 552-564.
• 31 Ramoni MF. et al. Cluster analysis of gene expression dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 9121-9126.
• 32 Ernst J. et al. Clustering short time series gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: i159-68.
• 33 Ferrazzi F. et al. Random walk models for bayesian clustering of gene expression profiles. Appl Bioinformatics 2005; 4: 263-276.
• 34 Magni P. et al. TimeClust: a clustering tool for gene expression time series. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 430-432.
• 35 Bellazzi R. et al. Microarray Data Analysis: Gene Regulatory Networks. In: Advanced Methods of Biomedical Signal Processing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. pp. 473-488.
• 36 Di Camillo B, Toffolo G. Reverse Engineering of High-Throughput Genomic and Genetic Data. In: Modelling methodology for Physiology and Medicine-2nd Edition. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 189-205.
• 37 Sambo F. et al. Probabilistic modelling with Bayesian networks. In: Modelling methodology for Physiology and Medicine- 2nd Edition. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 257-280.
• 38 Wang RS. et al. Boolean modeling in systems biology: an overview of methodology and applications. Phys Biol 2012; 9: 055001.
• 39 Somogyi R, Sniegoski CA. Modeling the complexity of genetic networks: Understanding multigenic and pleiotropic regulation. Complexity 1996; 1: 45-63.
• 40 Shmulevich I. et al. Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 261-274.
• 41 Liang S. et al. Reveal, a general reverse engineering algorithm for inference of genetic network architectures. Pac Symp Biocomput 1998: 18-29.
• 42 Basso K. et al. Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 382-390.
• 43 Margolin AA. et al. ARACNE: An algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: S7.
• 44 Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 2004; 303: 799-805.
• 45 Friedman N. et al. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol 2000; 7: 601-620.
• 46 Segal E. et al. A module map showing conditional activity of expression modules in cancer. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 1090-1098.
• 47 Segal E. et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet 2003; 34: 166-176.
• 48 Perrin BE. et al. Gene networks inference using dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: ii138-148.
• 49 Ferrazzi F. et al. Inferring cell cycle feedback regulation from gene expression data. J Biomed Inform 2011; 44: 565-575.
• 50 Grzegorczyk M, Husmeier D. A non-homogeneous dynamic Bayesian network with sequentially coupled interaction parameters for applications in systems and synthetic biology. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2012: 11.
• 51 Steele E, Tucker A. Consensus and Meta-analysis regulatory networks for combining multiple microarray gene expression datasets. J Biomed Inform 2008; 41: 914-926.
• 52 Werhli AV, Husmeier D. Gene regulatory network reconstruction by Bayesian integration of prior knowledge and/or different experimental conditions. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2008; 6: 543-572.
• 53 Chen H, VanBuren V. A review of integration strategies to support gene regulatory network construction. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 435257.
• 54 Bernard A, Hartemink AJ. Informative structure priors: joint learning of dynamic regulatory networks from multiple types of data. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005: 459-470.
• 55 Praveen P, Frohlich H. Boosting probabilistic graphical model inference by incorporating prior knowledge from multiple sources. PloS One 2013; 8: e67410.
• 56 Cooper GF. The Computational-Complexity of Probabilistic Inference Using Bayesian Belief Networks. Artif Intell 1990; 42: 393-405.
• 57 Heckerman D. et al. Learning Bayesian Networks - the Combination of Knowledge and Statistical-Data. Mach Learn 1995; 20: 197-243.
• 58 Cooper GF, Herskovits E. A Bayesian Method for the Induction of Probabilistic Networks from Data. Mach Learn 1992; 9: 309-347.
• 59 Friedman N. et al. Learning Bayesian Network Structure from Massive Datasets: The “Sparse Candidate” Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1999. pp. 206-215.
• 60 Schmidt M. et al. Learning graphical model structure using L1-regularization paths. In: Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2. AAAI Press; 2007 pp. 1278-1283.
• 61 Friedman N, Koller D. Being Bayesian about network structure. A Bayesian approach to structure discovery in Bayesian networks. Mach Learn 2003; 50: 95-125.
• 62 Giudici P, Castelo R. Improving Markov Chain Monte Carlo model search for data mining. Mach Learn 2003; 50: 127-158.
• 63 Grzegorczyk M, Husmeier D. Improving the structure MCMC sampler for Bayesian networks by introducing a new edge reversal move. Mach Learn 2008; 71: 265-305.
• 64 Young WC. et al. Fast Bayesian inference for gene regulatory networks using ScanBMA. BMC Syst Biol 2014; 8: 47.
• 65 Rustici G. et al. ArrayExpress update--trends in database growth and links to data analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D987-990.
• 66 Barrett T. et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--update. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D991-995.
• 67 Walsh S. et al. Cardiomyocyte cell cycle control and growth estimation in vivo-an analysis based on cardiomyocyte nuclei. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 86: 365-373.
• 68 Pohjoismaki JL. et al. Oxidative stress during mitochondrial biogenesis compromises mtDNA integrity in growing hearts and induces a global DNA repair response. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 6595-6607.
• 69 Giudice J. et al. Alternative splicing regulates vesicular trafficking genes in cardiomyocytes during postnatal heart development. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3603.
• 70 Li X. et al. Transcriptional Atlas of Cardiogenesis Maps Congenital Heart Disease Interactome. Physiol Genom 2014; 46: 482-495.
• 71 Vijaya M. et al. Differential gene expression profiles during embryonic heart development in diabetic mice pregnancy. Gene 2013; 516: 218-227.
• 72 Iruretagoyena JI. et al. Metabolic gene profile in early human fetal heart development. Mol Hum Reprod 2014; 20: 690-700.
• 73 Horsthuis T. et al. Gene expression profiling of the forming atrioventricular node using a novel tbx3-based node-specific transgenic reporter. Circ Res 2009; 105: 61-69.
• 74 Votteler M. et al. Elastogenesis at the onset of human cardiac valve development. Development 2013; 140: 2345-2353.
• 75 Buermans HP. et al. Comprehensive gene-expression survey identifies wif1 as a modulator of cardiomyocyte differentiation. PloS One 2010; 5: e15504.
• 76 Krejci E. et al. Microarray analysis of normal and abnormal chick ventricular myocardial development. Physiol Res 2012; 61: S137-144.
• 77 Zeitouni B. et al. Signalling pathways involved in adult heart formation revealed by gene expression profiling in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 2007; 3: 1907-1921.
• 78 Christoforou N. et al. Mouse ES cell-derived cardiac precursor cells are multipotent and facilitate identification of novel cardiac genes. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 894-903.
• 79 Martinez-Fernandez A. et al. Natural cardiogenesis-based template predicts car-diogenic potential of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2013; 6: 462-471.
• 80 Poon E. et al. Transcriptome-guided functional analyses reveal novel biological properties and regulatory hierarchy of human embryonic stem cell-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes crucial for maturation. PloS One 2013; 8: e77784.
• 81 Babiarz JE. et al. Determination of the human cardiomyocyte mRNA and miRNA differentiation network by fine-scale profiling. Stem Cells Dev 2012; 21: 1956-1965.
• 82 Banerjee I. et al. Determination of cell types and numbers during cardiac development in the neonatal and adult rat and mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Phy-siol 2007; 293: H1883-1891.
• 83 Higuchi K. et al. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes in the rat heart. Arch Histol Cytol 2000; 63: 115-126.
• 84 Vliegen HW. et al. Myocardial changes in pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy. A study on tissue composition, polyploidization and multinucleation. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 488-494.
• 85 Hsieh PC. et al. Endothelial-cardiomyocyte interactions in cardiac development and repair. Annu Rev Physiol 2006; 68: 51-66.
• 86 Cai CL. et al. Isl1 identifies a cardiac progenitor population that proliferates prior to differentiation and contributes a majority of cells to the heart. Dev Cell 2003; 5: 877-889.
• 87 Shannon P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 13: 2498-2504.
• 88 Franceschini A. et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D808-815.
• 89 Chen H, VanBuren V. A provisional gene regulatory atlas for mouse heart development. PloS One 2014; 9: e83364.
• 90 Mathelier A. et al. JASPAR 2014: an extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42: D142-147.
• 91 ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012; 489: 57-74.
• 92 Dewey FE. et al. Gene coexpression network topology of cardiac development, hypertrophy, and failure. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2011; 4: 26-35.
• 93 Herrmann F. et al. A boolean model of the cardiac gene regulatory network determining first and second heart field identity. PloS One 2012; 7: e46798.
• 94 Toenjes M. et al. Prediction of cardiac transcription networks based on molecular data and complex clinical phenotypes. Mol Biosyst 2008; 4: 589-598.
• 95 Wang L. et al. Cell cycle gene networks are associated with melanoma prognosis. PloS One 2012; 7: e34247.
• 96 Kunkle BW. et al. Reverse engineering of modified genes by Bayesian network analysis defines molecular determinants critical to the development of glioblastoma. PloS One 2013; 8: e64140.
• 97 Huan T. et al. A systems biology framework identifies molecular underpinnings of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013; 33: 1427-1434.
• 98 Wang IM. et al. Systems analysis of eleven rodent disease models reveals an inflammatome signature and key drivers. Mol Syst Biol 2012; 8: 594.