Thromb Haemost 2016; 116(01): 155-161
DOI: 10.1160/TH15-11-0892
Stroke, Systemic or Venous Thromboembolism
Schattauer GmbH

Clinical impact and course of major bleeding with edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonists

Marjolein P. A. Brekelmans
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Suzanne M. Bleker
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Rupert Bauersachs
2   Department of Vascular Medicine, Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
,
Zoltan Boda
3   Thrombosis and Haemostasis Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
,
Harry R. Büller
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Youngsook Choi
4   Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Edison, New Jersey, USA
,
Alex Gallus
5   SA Pathology at Flinders Medical Centre & Flinders University, Adelaide, Southern Australia, Australia
,
Michael A. Grosso
4   Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Edison, New Jersey, USA
,
Saskia Middeldorp
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Doyeun Oh
6   Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
,
Gary Raskob
7   College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
,
Lee Schwocho
4   Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Edison, New Jersey, USA
,
Alexander T. Cohen
8   Department of Haematological Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, King’s College London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 20 November 2015

Accepted after major revision: 10 March 2016

Publication Date:
27 November 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

Edoxaban is a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The Hokusai-VTE study revealed that, after initial treatment with heparin, edoxaban was non-inferior to and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This is the first report on the clinical relevance and management of bleeding events with edoxaban. All major bleeding events were classified blindly by three study-independent adjudicators. Predefined criteria were used to classify severity of clinical presentation and, separately, the clinical course and outcome into four categories. Major bleeding occurred in 56 patients treated with edoxaban and 65 patients treated with VKA. The severest categories (3 or 4) of the clinical presentation were assigned to 46 % of the major bleeding episodes in edoxaban recipients versus 58 % of the major bleeds in VKA recipients (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30–1.27, p = 0.19). Clinical course was classified as severe (category 3 or 4) in 23 % of the edoxaban and 29 % of the VKA associated bleeds (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.32–1.66, p = 0.46). In conclusion, edoxaban associated major bleeding events have a comparable clinical presentation and course to major bleeds with VKA in patients treated for venous thromboembolism in the Hokusai-VTE study. These results may assure physicians that it is safe to prescribe this medication. If a major bleeding during edoxaban treatment occurs, its clinical presentation and clinical course are not worse than in VKA-treated patients.