Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1160/TH16-03-0209
Rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism
The SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER) Financial support: This study was funded by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) 2007 Presidential Fund, Sanofi-Aventis (Suisse) SA, Vernier, Bayer (Schweiz) AG, Zurich, Pfizer AG, Zurich, and Bristol-Myers Squibb AG, Cham, Switzerland.Publication History
Received:
14 March 2016
Accepted after major revision:
17 May 2016
Publication Date:
29 November 2017 (online)
Summary
We investigated three-month clinical outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated with rivaroxaban or conventional anticoagulation in routine clinical practice. Between November 2012 and February 2015, 2,062 consecutive patients with VTE from 11 acute care hospitals in Switzerland were enrolled in the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER). Overall, 417 (20 %) patients were treated with rivaroxaban. In comparison to 1,645 patients on conventional anticoagulation, patients on rivaroxaban were younger (56 ± 18 vs. 65 ± 17 years; p<0.001), less often had pulmonary embolism (38 % vs 66 %; p<0.001), hypertension (26 % vs 41 %; p<0.001), cancer (10 % vs 28 %; p<0.001), congestive heart failure (10 % vs 17 %; p=0.001), diabetes (8 % vs 15 %; p<0.001), chronic lung disease (7 % vs 13 %; p=0.001), renal insufficiency (7 % vs 13 %; p=0.001), recent surgery (7 % vs 14 %; p<0.001), and acute coronary syndrome (1 % vs 4 %; p=0.009). VTE reperfusion therapy was more frequently used (28 % vs 9 %; p<0.001) and indefinite-duration anticoagulation treatment less often planned (26 % vs 39 %; p<0.001), respectively. In the propensity score-adjusted population, the risk of recurrent VTE was similar in patients on rivaroxaban vs conventional anticoagulation (1.2 % vs 2.1 %, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.18–1.65; p=0.29); the risk of major bleeding was also similar, respectively (0.5 % vs 0.5 %, HR 1.00, 95 %CI 0.14–7.07; p=1.00). Conventional anticoagulation is still frequently used for the treatment of VTE, particularly in the elderly and those with comorbidities. Early clinical outcomes were comparable between propensity score-adjusted patient populations on rivaroxaban and conventional anticoagulation.
-
References
- 1 Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2342-2352.
- 2 Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B. et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2499-2510.
- 3 Buller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW. et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1287-1297.
- 4 Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A. et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 799-808.
- 5 Buller HR, Decousus H, Grosso MA. et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1406-1415.
- 6 Robertson L, Kesteven P, McCaslin JE.. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; DOI: doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010956.pub2.
- 7 Robertson L, Kesteven P, McCaslin JE.. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; DOI: doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010957.pub2.
- 8 van der Hulle T, Kooiman J, den Exter PL. et al. Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12: 320-328.
- 9 Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e419S-494S.
- 10 Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G. et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3033-3069.
- 11 Prins MH, Lensing AW, Bauersachs R. et al. Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and PE randomized studies. Thromb J 2013; 11: 21.
- 12 Beyer-Westendorf J, Forster K, Pannach S. et al. Rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban bleeding in daily care: results from the Dresden NOAC registry. Blood 2014; 124: 955-962.
- 13 Ageno W, Mantovani LG, Haas S. et al. Safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (XALIA): an international, prospective, non-interventional study. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3: e12-21.
- 14 Dault R, Vanasse A, Blais L. et al. Patterns and Predictors of Use of Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Following Approval of Rivaroxaban. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015 Epub ahead of print.
- 15 Geldhof V, Vandenbriele C, Verhamme P. et al. Venous thromboembolism in the elderly: efficacy and safety of non-VKA oral anticoagulants. Thromb J. 2014 Epub ahead of print.
- 16 Carrier M, Cameron C, Delluc A. et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of acute cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2014; 134: 1214-1219.
- 17 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2016; 149: 315-352.