Thromb Haemost 2018; 118(02): 381-387
DOI: 10.1160/TH17-08-0568
New Technologies, Diagnostic Tools and Drugs
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Activated Factor X-Based versus Thrombin-Based Antithrombin Testing in Thrombophilia Workup in the DOAC Era

Heiko Rühl
*   Both authors contributed equally to the study.
,
Sara Reda
*   Both authors contributed equally to the study.
,
Jens Müller
,
Johannes Oldenburg
,
Bernd Pötzsch
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 August 2017

20 November 2017

Publication Date:
29 January 2018 (online)

Abstract

Antithrombin (AT) activity tests are used for diagnosing hereditary AT deficiency, a main genetic determinant of thrombophilia. They are either based on inhibition of thrombin (FIIa) or activated factor X (FXa). FXa-based assays have been suggested to be preferable to FIIa-based assays due to their higher sensitivity for certain AT deficiency causing mutations. To assess the performance of these two methods in a real-world scenario, 745 consecutively collected samples from patients referred to our institute during a 3-month period for thrombophilia testing were analysed. In samples from patients not receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants or heparins (n = 485), both methods showed good agreement (r = 0.874, Bland–Altman limits of agreement 6.57%, −15.76%). While similar results were obtained in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, n = 76, r = 0.891, 4.09%, −14.35%), the agreement was lower in patients receiving rivaroxaban (n = 86, r = 0.570, 5.97%, −49.43%) and apixaban (n = 72, r = 0.735, 3.77%, −42.45%). Direct FXa inhibitors but not LMWH increased FXa-based assay results in a dose-dependent manner, while the FIIa-based test was unaffected. Both assay types were equally successful in detecting hereditary AT deficiency in our study population, as samples from 9 out of 10 patients with AT deficiency causing mutations were detected by each method. These data suggest that FXa-based AT testing can be preferred over FIIa-based methods only in the absence of direct FXa inhibitors. In patients receiving direct FXa inhibitors, AT activity testing should be performed using FIIa-based assays.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Huntington JA. Natural inhibitors of thrombin. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111 (04) 583-589
  • 2 Rühl H, Müller J, Harbrecht U. , et al. Thrombin inhibition profiles in healthy individuals and thrombophilic patients. Thromb Haemost 2012; 107 (05) 848-853
  • 3 Rau JC, Beaulieu LM, Huntington JA, Church FC. Serpins in thrombosis, hemostasis and fibrinolysis. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5 (Suppl. 01) 102-115
  • 4 Patnaik MM, Moll S. Inherited antithrombin deficiency: a review. Haemophilia 2008; 14 (06) 1229-1239
  • 5 Bauer KA, Nguyen-Cao TM, Spears JB. Issues in the diagnosis and management of hereditary antithrombin deficiency. Ann Pharmacother 2016; 50 (09) 758-767
  • 6 Luxembourg B, Lindhoff-Last E. Genomic diagnosis of thrombophilia in women: clinical relevance [in German]. Hamostaseologie 2007; 27 (01) 22-31
  • 7 Javela K, Engelbarth S, Hiltunen L, Mustonen P, Puurunen M. Great discrepancy in antithrombin activity measured using five commercially available functional assays. Thromb Res 2013; 132 (01) 132-137
  • 8 Beeck H, Nagel D, Pindur G. , et al. Measurement of antithrombin activity by thrombin-based and by factor Xa-based chromogenic substrate assays. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2000; 11 (02) 127-135
  • 9 Khor B, Van Cott EM. Laboratory tests for antithrombin deficiency. Am J Hematol 2010; 85 (12) 947-950
  • 10 Mackie I, Cooper P, Lawrie A, Kitchen S, Gray E, Laffan M. ; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the laboratory aspects of assays used in haemostasis and thrombosis. Int J Lab Hematol 2013; 35 (01) 1-13
  • 11 Zeng W, Tang L, Jian XR. , et al. Genetic analysis should be included in clinical practice when screening for antithrombin deficiency. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113 (02) 262-271
  • 12 Corral J, Vicente V. Puzzling questions on antithrombin: diagnostic limitations and real incidence in venous and arterial thrombosis. Thromb Res 2015; 135 (06) 1047-1048
  • 13 Merz M, Böhm-Weigert M, Braun S. , et al. Clinical multicenter evaluation of a new FXa-based antithrombin assay. Int J Lab Hematol 2011; 33 (05) 498-506
  • 14 Ungerstedt JS, Schulman S, Egberg N, Antovic J, Blombäck N. Discrepancy between antithrombin activity methods revealed in Antithrombin Stockholm: do factor Xa-based methods overestimate antithrombin activity in some patients?. Blood 2002; 99 (06) 2271-2272
  • 15 Bohner J, von Pape KW, Blaurock M. Thrombin-based antithrombin assays show overestimation of antithrombin III activity in patients on heparin therapy due to heparin cofactor II influence. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71 (03) 280-283
  • 16 Tran TH, Duckert F. Influence of heparin cofactor II (HCII) on the determination of antithrombin III (AT). Thromb Res 1985; 40 (04) 571-576
  • 17 Mackie I, Cooper P, Kitchen S. Quality assurance issues and interpretation of assays. Semin Hematol 2007; 44 (02) 114-125
  • 18 Lindahl TL, Baghaei F, Blixter IF. , et al; Expert Group on Coagulation of the External Quality Assurance in Laboratory Medicine in Sweden. Effects of the oral, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran on five common coagulation assays. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105 (02) 371-378
  • 19 Adcock DM, Gosselin R. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the laboratory: 2015 review. Thromb Res 2015; 136 (01) 7-12
  • 20 Kitchen S, Gray E, Mackie I, Baglin T, Makris M. ; BCSH Committee. Measurement of non-coumarin anticoagulants and their effects on tests of haemostasis: guidance from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol 2014; 166 (06) 830-841
  • 21 Hillarp A, Gustafsson KM, Faxälv L. , et al. Effects of the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban on routine coagulation assays and anti-FXa assays. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12 (09) 1545-1553
  • 22 Sanfelippo MJ, Engel JM, Onitilo AA. Antithrombin levels are unaffected by warfarin use. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138 (07) 967-968
  • 23 Mani H, Hesse C, Stratmann G, Lindhoff-Last E. Rivaroxaban differentially influences ex vivo global coagulation assays based on the administration time. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106 (01) 156-164
  • 24 Hillarp A, Baghaei F, Fagerberg Blixter I. , et al. Effects of the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban on commonly used coagulation assays. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9 (01) 133-139
  • 25 Douxfils J, Mullier F, Loosen C, Chatelain C, Chatelain B, Dogné JM. Assessment of the impact of rivaroxaban on coagulation assays: laboratory recommendations for the monitoring of rivaroxaban and review of the literature. Thromb Res 2012; 130 (06) 956-966
  • 26 Gosselin R, Grant RP, Adcock DM. Comparison of the effect of the anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban on coagulation assays. Int J Lab Hematol 2016; 38 (05) 505-513
  • 27 Douxfils J, Mullier F, Robert S, Chatelain C, Chatelain B, Dogné JM. Impact of dabigatran on a large panel of routine or specific coagulation assays. Laboratory recommendations for monitoring of dabigatran etexilate. Thromb Haemost 2012; 107 (05) 985-997
  • 28 Corral J, Hernandez-Espinosa D, Soria JM. , et al. Antithrombin Cambridge II (A384S): an underestimated genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis. Blood 2007; 109 (10) 4258-4263
  • 29 Orlando C, Heylen O, Lissens W, Jochmans K. Antithrombin heparin binding site deficiency: A challenging diagnosis of a not so benign thrombophilia. Thromb Res 2015; 135 (06) 1179-1185
  • 30 Kottke-Marchant K, Duncan A. Antithrombin deficiency: issues in laboratory diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126 (11) 1326-1336
  • 31 Marlar RA, Gausman JN. Laboratory testing issues for protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Int J Lab Hematol 2014; 36 (03) 289-295