Changes in Two Point Discrimination and the law of mobility in Diabetes Mellitus patients^[*]

Abstract

Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Two-point discrimination (TPD) is one method of quantitatively testing for loss of nerve function. The law of mobility for TPD is known for normal subjects in earlier studies but has not been studied for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for TPD among DM subjects.

Methods The Semmes Weinstein monofilament (SWMF) was used to measure the loss of protective sensation. An Aesthesiometer was used to find the TPD of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. All the subjects were screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above).

Results TPD of normal and diabetic subjects for different areas of hands and legs from proximal to distal is evaluated for 18 subjects. TPD values decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt’s law of mobility for TPD holds good for normal subjects in the hand and foot areas. The law of mobility for TPD in DM subjects holds well in the hand but doesn’t hold well in foot areas with or without sensation.

Conclusion TPD is a quantitative and direct measure of sensory loss. The TPD value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not hold well for Diabetic subjects in foot areas. The significance of this result is that the TPD of the diabetic subjects could provide direct, cost effective and quantitative measure of neuropathy.

^*This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

• References

• 1 Cavanagh PR, Simoneau GG, Ulbrecht JS. Ulceration, unsteadiness, and uncertainty: the biomechanical consequences of diabetes mellitus. J Biomechanics 1993; 26: 23-40 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90077-R
• 2 Delbridge L, Ctercteko G, Fowler C, Reeve TS, Lequesne LP. The Aetiology of diabetic neuropathic ulceration of the foot. British Journal of Surgery 1985; 72: 1-6 10.1002/bjs.1800720102 3881153
• 3 Bell-Krotoski JS, Weinstein S, Weinstein C. Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two point discrimination, point localization and vibration. J Hand Ther 1993; 6: 114 8393725
• 4 Dellon AL. Computer-assisted sensibility evaluation and surgical treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Adv Podiatry 1996; 2: 17-40
• 5 Urbancic-Rovan V, Stefanovska A, Bernjak A, Katja Azman-Juvan, Andreja Kocijancic. Skin blood flow in the upper and lower extremities of diabetic patients with and without autonomic neuropathy. J Vasc Res 2004; 41 (6) 535-45 Epub 2004 Oct 28 10.1159/000081810 15528936
• 6 Vierodt KH. Abhängigkeit der Ausbildung des Raumsinnes der Haut von der Beweglichkeit der Körpertheile. (Dependence of the development of the skin’s spatial sense on the flexibility of parts of the body). Zeitschrift für Biologie 1870; 6: 53-72
• 7 Weber EH. De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. In: Ross HE, Murray DJ. E.H. Weber, on the tactile senses. Taylor & Francis; Hove (UK): 1834
• 8 Wilska A. On the vibrational sensitivity in different regions of the body surface. Acta Physiol Scand 1954; 31: 284-289 13197098
• 9 Weinstein S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body-part, sex and laterality. In: Kenshalo DR. The Skin Senses. C.C. Thomas; Springfield: 1968: 195-218
• 10 Ferreira MarcusCastro, Leandro Rodriguez, Klaus Fels. New method for evaluation of cutaneous sensibility in diabetic feet: preliminary report. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2004; 59: 286-290 15543401
• 11 Finnell JT, Knopp R, Johnson P, Holland PC, Schubert W. A calibrated paper clip is a reliable measure of two-point discrimination. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 710-714 15175216
• 12 Dellon ES, Keller KM, Moratz V, Dellon AL. Validation of cutaneous pressure threshold measurements for the evaluation of hand function. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 485-92 10.1097/00000637-199705000-00008 9160130
• 13 Craig JamesC, Kisner JayneM. Factors affecting tactile spatial acuity. Journal Somatosensory and Motor Research 1998; 15 (1) 29-45 10.1080/08990229870934
• 14 Patil KM, Babu M, Oommen PK, Malaviya GN. On-line system of measurement and analysis of standing and walking foot pressures in normal and patients with neuropathic feet. Innov Technol Biol Med, France 1996; 17 (5) 401-8
• 15 Rendell M, Bergman T, O’Donnell G, Drobny E, Borgos J, Bonner RF. Micro vascular blood flow, volume, and velocity measured by laser Doppler techniques in IDDM. Diabetes 1989; 38: 819-824 10.2337/diabetes.38.7.819 2737363
• 16 Stevens JC, Alvarez-Reeves M, Dipietro L, Mack GW, Green BG. Decline of tactile acuity in aging: a study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity. Somato sensory and Motor Research 2003; 20 (3 & 4) 271-279 10.1080/08990220310001622997
• 17 Boring EdwinG. The two point limens and the error of localization. The American journal of physiology 1930; 42 (3) 446-449