RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.12687/phleb2225-5-2014
Measuring diameters of great saphenous vein and common femoral vein using duplex ultrasound
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutschPublikationsverlauf
Received:
28. Juli 2014
Accepted:
01. August 2014
Publikationsdatum:
04. Januar 2018 (online)
Summary
For years, measurement of the diameter of the great saphenous vein and, occasionally, the common femoral vein has been a component of many clinical studies on varicose vein treatment. There is consensus that the measurements should be conducted with the patient in the standing position and with a transverse view through the vein, but no standardised site of measurement of the venous diameter has yet been established. The shape of the great saphenous vein varies greatly at the saphenofemoral junction. Due to the curvature of the great saphenous vein, it is difficult to find a point at which the transverse view measured is at right angles to the course of the vein. According to the available data, the optimal site for measuring the great saphenous vein diameter is the proximal thigh. When measuring the common femoral vein, a transverse view immediately distal to the junction of the great saphenous vein is suggested and studies have also confirmed this.
-
References
- 1 Coleridge-Smith P, Labropoulos N, Partsch H, Myers K, Nicolaides A, Cavezzi A. Duplex-Ultraschalluntersuchung der Venen der unteren Extremitäten bei chronischer Veneninsuffizienz* – UIP Konsensusdokument Teil I: Grundlagen. Phlebologie 2006; 35 (05) 256-263.
- 2 Mendoza E, Blättler W, Amsler F. Great Saphenous Vein Diameter at the Saphenofemoral Junction and Proximal Thigh as Parameters of Venous Disease Class. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2013; 45 (01) 76-83.
- 3 Mendoza E, Berger V, Zollmann C, Bomhoff M, Amsler F. Kaliberreduktion der V. saphena magna und der V. femoralis communis nach CHIVA. Phlebologie 2011; 40 (02) 73-78.
- 4 Mendoza E. Kaliberreduktion der V. saphena magna und der V. femoralis communis nach CHIVA – Langzeitergebnisse. Phlebologie 2013; 42: 65-69.