Power through standards: The Federal Conference for Outcome Measurement and Benefit Assessment of Chronic Wounds

Summary

Background When concerning documentation and follow up measurement for chronic wounds, uniform standards are a vital precondition for further development of care in Germany. The Federal Consensus Conference “Outcome Measurement and Benefit Assessment for Chronic Wounds” has taken action and has approved systematic recommendations including small data records since 2013.

Aim In the following review rationales, objectives, methods and action outcomes of the Federal Consensus Conference are summarized.

Results Experts from more than 25 different scientific expert associations, professional associations, organizations specialized in care, representatives of statutory health insurance companies as well as the Federal Ministry of Health participated in the consensus formation. From 2013–2015 a total of eight consensus meetings as well as six online consensus enquiries were agreed upon. These entailed a) the relevant subject areas for consensus formation, b) the necessary standards for wound documentation, c) recommendations concerning the enquiries on quality of life for people with chronic wounds, d) recommendations for minimal clinically relevant differences, e) standards on utilization of secondary data and f) recommendations for health-economic analytics of ulcus cruris. The first four publications concerning this topic were finalized.

Conclusions The combination of personal attendance meetings and online enquiries with a broad panel of experts has proved to be an efficient tool for consensus formation regarding the documentation criteria and outcome criteria for chronic wounds using the example of ulcus cruris. The present results are subject of an active implementation in 2016/2017 and at the same time provide a chance for an improved process- and result quality concerning nationwide care.

Keywords

Outcome measurement - benefit assessment - chronic wounds - standard guidelines

• References

• 1 Augustin M, Debus ES. (Hrsg.). Moderne Wundversorgung – im Spannungsfeld zwischen Qualitätsanspruch, Zuständigkeiten und Sparzwang. [Modern wound care in the stress field of quality, responsibilities and economics]. Bonn: Beta Verlag; 2011
• 2 European Wound Management Association (EWMA): Position Document: Hard-to-Heal Wounds: a Holistic Approach. London: MEP; 2008 http://ewma.org/fileadmin/user_upload/EWMA/pdf/Position_Documents/2008/English_EWMA_Hard2Heal_2008.pdf
• 3 Augustin M, Mayer G, Wild T. [Challenges of aging skin: Care and therapy using the example of venous ulcers]. Hautarzt. 2016 [Epub ahead of print]..
• 4 Augustin M, Debus ES. (Hrsg.). Moderne Wundversorgung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Qualitätsanspruch, Zuständigkeiten und Sparzwang. Wiesbaden: mhp Verlag; 2009
• 5 Goepel L, Heyer K, Herberger K, Stuppardt R. et al. Selektivverträge zu chronischen Wunden – aktueller Stand in Deutschland. Gefässchirurgie 2015; 20: 18-24.
• 6 Goepel L, Herberger K, Debus ES, Diener H. et al. Wundnetze in Deutschland: Struktur, Funktionen und Ziele 2014 [Wound Networks in Germany: Structure, Functions and Objectives 2014]. Haut -arzt 2014; 65 (11) 960-966.
• 7 Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P. Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management. European Wound Management association Patient Outcome Group. J Wound Care 2010; 19: 237-268.
• 8 Heyer K, Augustin M, Protz K, Herberger K. et al. Effectiveness of Advanced versus Conventional Wound Dressings on Healing of Chronic Wounds – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dermatology 2013; 226 (02) 172-184.
• 9 Purwins S, Herberger K, Debus ES, Rustenbach SJ. et al. Cost-of-illness of chronic leg ulcers in Germany. Int Wound J 2010; 07: 7-102.
• 10 Augustin M, Brocatti LK, Rustenbach SJ, Schaefer I, Herberger K. Cost-of-Illness of Leg Ulcers in the Community. Int Wound J 2014; 11 (03) 283-292.
• 11 Blome C, Baade K, Debus ES, Price P, Augustin M. The “Wound-QoL”: A Short Questionnaire Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Wounds Based on Three Established Disease-Specific Instruments. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22 (04) 504-514.
• 12 Augustin M, Mayer A, Goepel LM, Baade K. et al. Cumulative Life Course Impairment (CLCI): a new concept to characterize persistent patient burden in chronic wounds. Wound Medicine 2013; 01: 2-6.
• 13 Heyer K, Augustin M. Therapie chronischer Wunden – Schwerpunkt Ulcus cruris. In: Sauer K, Rothgang H, Glaeske G. Barmer GEK Heil- und Hilfsmittelreport 2014. Berlin: Asgard 1. Verlags-service GmbH; 2014
• 14 Augustin M, Rustenbach SJ, Debus S, Grams L. et al. Quality of Care in Chronic Leg Ulcer in the Community: Introduction of Quality Indicators and a Scoring System. Dermatology 2011; 222 (04) 321-329.
• 15 European Wound Management Association (EWMA): Position Document: Hard-to-Heal Wounds: a Holistic Approach. London: MEP; 2008 http://ewma.org/fileadmin/user_upload/EWMA/pdf/Position_Documents/2008/English_EWMA_Hard2Heal_2008.pdf