Download PDF
Phlebologie 2017; 46(01): 13-18
DOI: 10.12687/phleb2327-1-2017
Review
Schattauer GmbH

Treatment of chronic ulcers

A critical short analysisDie Behandlung chronischer Ulzera Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme
Ch. Busch
1   Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Germany
2   Dermateam, Bankstrasse 4, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
,
I. Aschermann
1   Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Germany
,
Ch.D. Mnich
2   Dermateam, Bankstrasse 4, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations Sources of Funding The own works cited were enabled by research grants to CB by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie (DGP).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 08 July 2016

Accepted: 22 December 2016

Publication Date:
05 January 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Chronic ulcers (CUs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality with increasing prevalence, in part due to the ageing population, and an increase of risk factors such as diabetes and obesity. CUs are caused by numerous diseases including venous dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, infections, peripheral neuropathy, pressure, and atherosclerosis. The current standard therapy for CUs includes compression, surgical débridement, infection control, and adequate wound dressings. As a high percentage of CUs do not adequately heal or quickly relapse with standard treatments, additional therapeutic approaches are pursued, termed “advanced wound care therapies”. Here, an overview on commonly applied therapies lacking significant evidence for wound healing is reviewed, followed by therapies with significant evidence supporting the routine use in the treatment of CUs, and a short outlook in a possible future wound treatment landscape.

To give a résumé, the presented literature reveals that most of the commonly applied topical and advanced ulcer treatments largely lack solid scientific evidence for the induction or acceleration of wound healing. Surprisingly only “classical” treatments such as wound cleansing, débridement and compression have significant evidence. Novel approaches such as bilayered skin reconstructs, cell suspensions or extracorporal shock waves seem promising. Considering the increasing number of ulcer patients, there is a strong need for further basic research to fully understand all factors involved in wound development and healing of the various ulcer pathophysiologies, and the urgent need for prospective clinical trials comparing the various treatment options.

Zusammenfassung

Das chronische Ulkus ist eine schwerwiegende Erkrankung mit steigender Inzidenz, was vor allem auf die alternde Gesellschaft und die Zunahme von Risikofaktoren wie Diabetes mellitus und Adipositas zurückzuführen ist. Chronische Ulzera haben vielerlei zugrundeliegende Pathologien wie beispielsweise venöse Dysfunktion, Diabetes mellitus, Infektionen, Neuropathie, Druck und Atherosklerose. Die gegenwärtige Standardbehandlung des chronischen Ulkus beinhaltet Kompression, Débridement, Infektionsprophylaxe sowie der Heilungsphase angepasste Wundauflagen. Da ein grosser Anteil chronischer Wunden unter der Standardbehandlung nicht vollständig abheilt oder rasch rezidiviert, werden häufig moderne Zusatzbehandlungen notwendig. Im vorliegenden Übersichtsartikel wurde mittels Literaturrecherche die aktuelle Datenlage bezüglich Wundbehandlungen untersucht. Insbesondere wurde gezielt danach gefragt, in wie fern sich die jeweiligen Behandlungsmethoden auf wissenschaftliche Evidenz stützen, bzw. für welche Behandlungsmethoden es keine belastbaren wissenschaftlichen Daten gibt. Darüber hinaus wurden neuartige Wundbehandlungen untersucht, welche in Zukunft eine wichtige Rolle in der Wundbehandlung spielen könnten.

Zusammenfassend lässt sich feststellen, dass die meisten der derzeitigen klassischen und modernen Wundbehandlungen auf nur wenig belastbaren wissenschaftlichen Daten beruhen und der Evidenzgrad in Bezug auf Induktion bzw. Beschleunigung der Wundhei-lung sehr niedrig ist. Erstaunlicherweise lassen sich aus den vorliegenden Studiendaten bisher nur klassische Behandlungen wie Wundreinigung, Débridement und Kompression als gesicherte Therapien mit solider Evidenzlage ableiten. Neue Therapieansätze wie zelluläre zweischichtige Hautrekonstrukte, Zellsuspensionen oder extrakorporale Stoß-wellen scheinen wirksam zu sein. In Anbetracht der steigenden Inzidenz des chronischen Ulkus ist weitere Grundlagenforschung dringend notwendig, um die Mechanismen der Wundentstehung und -heilung der verschiedenen zugrundeliegenden Pathophysiologien im Detail zu verstehen. Darüber hinaus besteht eine große Notwendigkeit für klinische Studien, in denen die verschiedenen Behandlungsoptionen prospektiv miteinander verglichen werden.

Keywords

Ulcer - wound healing - wound dressing - therapy

Schlüsselwörter

Ulkus - Wundbehandlung - Wundauflage - Therapie
 

  • References

  • 1 Adams J, Schott S, Bern A. et al. A novel role for relaxin-2 in the pathogenesis of primary varicosis. PLoS One 2012; 7: e39021.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Aschermann A, Noor S, Venturelli S. et al. Extra-corporal shock waves activate migration, proliferation and inflammatory pathways in fibroblasts and keratinocytes, and improve wound healing in an open-label, single-arm study in patients with therapy-refractory chronic leg ulcers. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017 in press.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S. et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV. VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 871-879.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Augustin M. Cumulative life course impairment in chronic wounds. Curr Probl Dermatol 2013; 44: 125-129.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Augustin M, Brocatti LK, Rustenbach SJ, Schäfer I, Herberger K. Cost-of-illness of leg ulcers in the community. Int Wound J 2014; 11: 283-292.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schonbein GW, Smith PD. et al. Chronic venous disease. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 488-498.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Busch C, Schnabl S, Strölin A. Endocrine mechanisms in the pathogenesis of primary varicosis. Phlebologie 2013; 42: 13-18.
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Busch C, Schnabl S. Characteristic skin changes in CVI. Phlebologie 2014; 43: 108-111.
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Caputo WJ, Vaquero C, Monterosa A. et al. A retrospective study of cryopreserved umbilical cord as an adjunctive therapy to promote the healing of chronic, complex foot ulcers with underlying osteomyelitis. Wound Repair Regen 2016; 24: 885-893.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Chen C, Hou WH, Chan ES, Yeh ML, Lo HL. Phototherapy for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD009224.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cruciani M, Lipsky BA, Mengoli C, de Lalla F. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 8: CD006810.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Dat AD, Poon F, Pham KB, Doust J. Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2: CD008762.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Dissemond J, Assenheimer B, Bültemann A. et al. Compression therapy in patients with venous leg ulcers. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2016; 14: 1072-1087.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Dumville JC, Deshpande S, O’Meara S, Speak K. Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6: CD009111.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Dumville JC, Keogh SJ, Liu Z, Stubbs N, Walker RM, Fortnam M. Alginate dressings for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 5: CD011277.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Dumville JC, Land L, Evans D, Peinemann F. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 7: CD011354.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Dumville JC, O’Meara S, Deshpande S, Speak K. Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6: CD009110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Dumville JC, O’Meara S, Deshpande S, Speak K. Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD009101.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Dumville JC, Stubbs N, Keogh SJ, Walker RM, Liu Z. Hydrogel dressings for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2: CD011226.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Fernandez R, Griffiths R. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2: CD003861.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Forster R, Pagnamenta F. Dressings and topical agents for arterial leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 6: CD001836.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Green J, Jester R, McKinley R, Pooler A. The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2014; 23: 601-612.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Heyer K, Protz K, Glaeske G, Augustin M. Epidemiology and use of compression treatment in venous leg ulcers: nationwide claims data analysis in Germany. Int Wound J. 2016 May 19. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12605. [Epub ahead of print].
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Jhamb S, Vangaveti VN, Malabu UH. Genetic and molecular basis of diabetic foot ulcers: Clinical review. J Tissue Viability 2016; 25: 229-236.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Deshpande S, Walker N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 3: CD005083.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Karavan M, Olerud J, Bouldin E, Taylor L, Reiber GE. Evidence-based chronic ulcer care and lower limb outcomes among Pacific Northwest Veterans. Wound Repair Regen 2015; 23: 745-752.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 1431-1437.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Kirsner RS, Marston WA, Snyder RJ. et al. Spray-applied cell therapy with human allogeneic fibrob-lasts and keratinocytes for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: a phase 2, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 977-985.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kirsner RS, Sabolinski ML, Parsons NB, Skornicki M, Marston WA. Comparative effectiveness of a bioengineered living cellular construct vs. a dehydrated human amniotic membrane allograft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in a real world setting. Wound Repair Regen 2015; 23: 737-744.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kranke P, Bennett MH, Martyn-St James M. et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 6: CD004123.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Larking AM, Duport S, Clinton M, Hardy M, Andrews K. Randomized control of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus placebo for chronic decubitus ulceration. Clin Rehabil 2010; 24: 222-229.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Santanna J, Baumgarten M. Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 381-386.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Marston WA, Sabolinski ML, Parsons NB, Kirsner RS. Comparative effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct and a porcine collagen wound dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22: 334-340.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Martinez-Zapata MJ, Martí-Carvajal AJ, Solà I. et al. Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 5: CD006899.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Mensah GA, Brown DW. An overview of cardiovascular disease burden in the United States. Health Aff 2007; 26: 38-48.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Mudge E, Price P, Walkley N, Harding KG. A randomized controlled trial of larval therapy for the debridement of leg ulcers: results of a multicentre, randomized, controlled, open, observer blind, parallel group study. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22: 43-51.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Nelson EA, Adderley U. Venous leg ulcers. BMJ Clin Evid 2016; pii: 1902.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Nicholas MN, Yeung J. Current Status and Future of Skin Substitutes for Chronic Wound Healing. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016 Aug 16. pii: 1203475416664037. [Epub ahead of print].
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Öien RF, Forssell H, Ragnarson Tennvall G. Cost consequences due to reduced ulcer healing times – analyses based on the Swedish Registry of Ulcer Treatment. Int Wound J 2016; 13: 957-962.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 O’Meara S, Al-Kurdi D, Ologun Y. et al. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 1: CD003557.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 41 O’Meara S, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Dumville JC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD000265.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 O’Meara S, Martyn-St James M. Alginate dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4: CD010182.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 O’Meara S, Martyn-St James M. Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD009907.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Raju S, Neglen P. Clinical practice. Chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2319-2327.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Saggini R, Figus A, Troccola A. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for management of chronic ulcers in the lower extremities. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1261-1271.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Schott S, Adams J, Bern A, Garbe C, Busch C. Expression of oxytocin and its receptor in healthy and varicose great saphenous veins. Pathology 2012; 44: 670-673.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Schryvers OI, Stranc MF, Nance PW. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcers: 20-year experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1556-1562.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Management of chronic venous leg ulcers; A national clinical guideline (2010).
  • 49 Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S. et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy: perspective article. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17: 763-771.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Stieger M, Schmid JP, Bajrami S, Hunziker T. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a treatment of a non-healing chronic leg ulcer. Hautarzt 2013; 64: 443-446.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Wilasrusmee C, Marjareonrungrung M, Eamkong S. et al. Maggot therapy for chronic ulcer: a retrospective cohort and a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2014; 37: 138-147.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Wilkinson EA. Oral zinc for arterial and venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 9: CD001273.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 53 Wu L, Norman G, Dumville JC. et al. Dressings for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 7: CD010471.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 54 Wu B, Lu J, Yang M, Xu T. Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 6: CD010694.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 55 Zenilman J, Valle MF, Malas MB. et al. Chronic Venous Ulcers: A Comparative Effectiveness Review of Treatment Modalities [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013. Dec. Report No.: 13(14)-EHC121-EF.
    Search in Google Scholar