Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2016; 44(04): 253-258
DOI: 10.15653/TPG-160312
Übersichtsartikel
Schattauer GmbH

Leistung und Gesundheit von Milchkühen: Bedeutung von Genetik (Ursache) und Management (Wirkung)

Ein Beitrag zur DiskussionProduction and diseases of dairy cows: Viewpoint for discussion regarding the significance of genetics (cause) and management (effect)A contribution to the discussion
Holger Martens
1   Institut für Veterinär-Physiologie der Freien Universität Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 14 March 2016

Accepted after major revision: 12 May 2016

Publication Date:
23 December 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Milchleistung der Kühe hat sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten aufgrund der Selektion auf Milchmenge, entsprechender Fütterung, veterinärmedizinischer Betreuung und erfolgreichen Managements kontinuierlich erhöht und es ist anzunehmen, dass sich dieser Trend fort - setzen wird. Mit der Milchleistung haben jedoch die Erkrankungsrate zu- und die Nutzungsdauer abgenommen. Umfangreiche Untersuchungen der Tierzucht zeigten genetische Korrelationen zwischen Milchleistung und Erkrankungen wie Ketose/Leberverfettung, Mastitis, Klauenerkrankungen, Metritis (alle entzündlichen Formen) und Abnahme der Fruchtbarkeit auf, deren Pathogenese im Wesentlichen durch die negative Energiebilanz als Folge der Selektion auf hohe Milchleistung kausal bestimmt wird. Die genetische Disposition wird in der Praxis durch Managementfaktoren beeinflusst und diese Wechselwirkungen bestimmen die Inzidenz der Erkrankungen und deren hohe Variation. Es muss also bei der Analyse der Erkrankungen unterschieden werden zwischen der genetischen Disposition (Ursache) und Managementfaktoren (Wirkungen). Eine nachhaltige Verbesserung der Situation schließt die Überprüfung der Zuchtwerte und damit der Selektionskriterien ein.

Summary

The milk production of dairy cows has been increased during recent decades through animal-husbandry, improved feeding regime, extensive veterinary service and proper management. It can be assumed that this tendency will be continued in the future. However, the incidence of diseases (production diseases), including ketosis, fat liver, mastitis, lameness, metritis and disturbed fertility, has also increased and exhibits a close genetic correlation with milk yield. The pathoge - nesis of these diseases is – more or less – causally related to the nega - tive energy balance and hence, is a consequence of selection for high milk yield. The genetic disposition and health risks are modulated by the management of dairy cows and both factors contribute to the large variation of diseases in practice. An analysis of production diseases must therefore distinguish between the genetic disposition (cause) and the management (effect). An effective improvement of the complex of production diseases includes the critical discussion of the current breeding index for dairy cows.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 ADR: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Rinderzüchter. Rinderproduktion in Deutschland. 2014.Ausgabe 2015. 1439-8745.
  • 2 Alvåsen K, Mörk M, Sandgren H, Thomsen P, Emanuelson U. Herd-level risk factors associated with cow mortality in Swedish dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 4352-4362.
  • 3 Bauman D, Currie E. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation. J Dairy Sci 2000; 63: 1514-1529.
  • 4 Beilharz R, Luxford B, Wilkinson J. Quantitative genetics and evolution: Is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution?. J Anim Breed Genet 1993; 110: 161-170.
  • 5 Berry D, Bermingham M, Good M, More S. Genetic of animal health and disease in cattle. Irish VetJ 2011; 64: 1-10.
  • 6 Bicalho R, Machado V, Caixata L. Lameness in dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a disease of debilitated cattle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of digital cushion. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 3175-3185.
  • 7 Brade W. Die Energiebilanz hoch leistender Milchkühe aus der Sicht der Züchtung und des Tierschutzes. Prakt Tierarzt 2013; 94: 536-544.
  • 8 Bobe G, Young J, Beitz D. Invited review: Pathology, etiology, prevention, and treatment of fatty liver in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 3105-3124.
  • 9 Butler R. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livestock Prod Sci 2003; 83: 211-218.
  • 10 Deming J, Bergeron R, Leslie K, DeVries T. Associations of housing, management, milking activity, and standing and lying behavior of dairy cows milked in automatic systems. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 344-351.
  • 11 DeVries T, Aarnoudse M, Barkema H, Leslie K, von Keyserlingk M. Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 5730-5739.
  • 12 Drackley J, Dann H. New concepts in nutritional management of dry cows. Advances in Dairy Technology 2005; 17: 11-23.
  • 13 Eckles C. A study of breedings records of dairy herds. Minn Agric Exp Stn Bull. 1929: 258 St. Paul.:
  • 14 Esposito G, Irons P, Webb C, Chapwanya A. Interactions between negative energy balance, metabolic diseases, uterine health and immune response in transition dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2014; 144: 60-71.
  • 15 Farmer A, Kadirkamanathan S, Aziz Q. Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. Br J Hosp Med 2012; 73: 451-456.
  • 16 Fleischer P, Metzner M, Beyerbach M, Hoedemaker M, Klee W. The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 2025-2035.
  • 17 Frigo E, Dechow C, Pedron O, Cassell B. The genetic relationship of body weight and early lactation health disorders in two experimental herds. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 1184-1192.
  • 18 Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (GfE). Empfehlungen zur Energieund Nährstoffversorgung der Milchkühe und Aufzuchtrinder. DLG Verlag Frankfurt. 2001 3-7690-0591-0
  • 19 Gernand E, Rehbein P, von Borstel U, König S. Incidences of and genetic parameters for mastitis, claw disorders, and common health traits recorded in dairy cattle contract herds. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 2144-2156.
  • 20 Goff J. Major advances in our understanding of nutritional influences on bovine health. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1292-1301.
  • 21 Gordon F, Patterson D, Yan T, Porter M, Mayne C, Unsworth E. The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and utilization of energy and nitrogen. Animal Sci 1995; 63: 199-210.
  • 22 Gravert H, Schröder E. Erhebung über tierärztliche Hilfe bei Milchkühen. Züchtungskunde 1972; 44: 75-80.
  • 23 Gröhn Y, Eicker S, Hertl J. The association between previous 305-day milk yield and disease in New York State dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78: 1693-1702.
  • 24 Gross J, Bruckmaier M. Repeatability of metabolic responses to a nutrient deficiency in early and mid lactation and implications for robustness of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 8634-8643.
  • 25 Hansen L. Consequences for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83: 1145-1150.
  • 26 Harworth G, Tranter W, Chuck J, Cheng Z, Wathes D. Relationship between age at first calving and first lactation milk yield, and life time productivity and longevity in dairy cows. Vet Rec 2008; 162: 643-647.
  • 27 Hayirli A. The role of exogenous insulin in the complex of hepatic lipidosis and ketosis associated with insulin resistance phenomenon in postpartum dairy cattle. Vet Res Commun 2006; 30: 749-774.
  • 28 Hellerich B. Zusammenhänge zwischen Fütterung, Haltung sowie Managementaspekten und der Tiergesundheit in Milchviehbetrieben (eine statistische Erhebung in Schleswig-Holstein). Thesis 2008 - Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover:. http://elib.tiho-hannover.de/dissertations/prienk_ss06.html
  • 29 Heringstad B, Klemetsdal G, Steiner T. Selection responses for disease resistance in two selection experiments with Norwegian Red Cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 2419-2426.
  • 30 Herr M, Bostedt H, Falling K. IgG and IgM levels in dairy cows during the periparturient period. Theriogenology 2011; 75: 377-385.
  • 31 Ingvartsen K. Feeding- and management-related diseases in transition cow. Physiological adaptations around calving and strategies to reduce feedingrelated diseases. Animal Feed Sci Technol 2006; 126: 175-213.
  • 32 Jamrozik J, Koeck A, Kistemaker G, Miglior F. Multiple-trait estimates of genetic parameters for metabolic disease traits, fertility disorders, and their predictors in Canadian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 1990-1998.
  • 33 Knaus W. Dairy cows trapped between performance demands and adaptability. J Sci Food Agric 2009; 89: 1107-1114.
  • 34 Koeck A, Loker S, Miglior F, Kelton D, Jamrozik J, Schenkel F. Genetic relationship of clinical mastitis, cystic ovaries, and lameness with milk yield and somatic cell score in first-lactation Canadians Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 5806-5813.
  • 35 König S, Sharifi A, Wentrot H, Landmann D, Eise M, Simianer H. Genetic parameters of claw and foot disorders estimated with logistic models. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 3316-3325.
  • 36 Laben R, Shanks R, Berger P, Freeman A. Factors affecting milk yield and reproductive performance. J Dairy Sci 1982; 65: 1004-1015.
  • 37 Lucy M, Jiang H, Kobayashi Y. Changes in the somatotrophic axis associated with the initiation of lactation. Dairy Sci 2001; 84: E113-E119.
  • 38 Luczak S, Steffl M, Amselgruber W. Einfluss der Milchleistung auf die Inzidenz ausgewählter Erkrankungen bei Hochleistungskühen. Tierärztl Prax 2009; 37(G): 221-228.
  • 39 Martens H. Stoffwechselbelastung und Gesundheitsrisiken der Milchkühe in der frühen Laktation. Tierärztl Umsch 2015; 70: 496-504.
  • 40 Miller R, Kuhn M, Norman H, Wright J. Death losses for lactating cows in herds enrolled in dairy herd improvement test plans. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 3710-3715.
  • 41 Missfeldt F, Missfeldt R, Kuwan K. Ökonomisch optimale Nutzungsdauer von Milchkühen. Züchtungskunde 2015; 87: 120-143.
  • 42 Mömke S, Sickinger M, Lichtner P, Doll K, Rehage J, Distl O. Genome wide association analysis identifies loci for left-sided displacement of the abomasum in German Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 3959-3964.
  • 43 Mulligan F, Doherty M. Production diseases of the transition cow. Vet Rec 2008; 176: 3-9.
  • 44 Pech M, Veerkamp R, Calus M, Zom R, van Knegsel A, Pryce A, De Haas Y. Genetic parameters across lactation for feed intake, fat- and protein-corrected milk, and live weight in first-parity Holstein cattle. Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 5851-5862.
  • 45 Pritchard T, Coffex M, Mrode R, Wall E. Understanding the genetics of survival in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 3296-3309.
  • 46 Pryce I, Veerkamp R, Thompson R, Hill W, Simm G. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Anim Sci 1997; 65: 353-360.
  • 47 Rauw M, Kanis E, Nordhuizen E, Grommers F. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Prod Sci 1998; 56: 15-33.
  • 48 Roland L, Drillich M, Klein-Jöbstl D, Iwersen M. Invited review: Influence of climatic conditions on the development, performance, and health of calves. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99 (04) 2438-2452.
  • 49 Rudolphi B. Beeinflussen Erkrankungen die Milchleistung von Kühen oder umgekehrt?. REKASAN- Journal 2012; 19: 89-97.
  • 50 Shahid M, Reneau J, Chester-Jones H, Chebel R, Endres M. Cow- and herdlevel risk factors for on-farm mortality in Midwest US dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 4401-4413.
  • 51 Simianer H, Solbu H, Schaeffer L. Estimated genetic correlations between disease and yield traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 4358-4365.
  • 52 Sordillo L, Raphael W. Significance of metabolic stress, lipid mobilization, and inflammation on transition cow disorders. Vet Clin Food Anim 2013; 29: 267-278.
  • 53 Strucken E, Bortfeld R, Tetens J, Thaller G, Brockmann G. Genetics effects and correlations between production and fertility traits and their dependency on the lactation-stage in Holstein Friesians. BMC Genetics 2012; 13: 108.
  • 54 Tamminga S, Luteijn A, Meijer G. Changes in composition and energy content of live weight in dairy cows with time after parturition. Livestock Prod Sci 1997; 52: 31-38.
  • 55 Uribe H, Kennedy B, Martin S, Kelton D. Genetic parameters for common health disorders of Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78: 421-430.
  • 56 van Meirhaeghe H, Deprez P, van den Hende C, Muylle E. Plasma glucose clearance and insulin response in cows with abomasal displacement. J Vet Med A 1988; 35: 221-228.
  • 57 Wangler A, Sanftleben P. Behandlungshäufigkeit bei Milchkühen in Praxisbetrieben in Abhängigkeit von der Milchleistung. Tierärztl Prax 2007; 35(G): 408-413.
  • 58 Windig J, Calus M, Beerda B, Veerkamp R. Genetic correlations between milk production and health and fertility depending on herd environment. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1765-1775.
  • 59 Zwald N, Weigel K, Chang Y, Welper R, Clay J. Genetic selection for health traits using producer-recorded data. ii. genetic correlations, disease probabilities, and relationships with existing traits. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 4295-4302.