Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.15654/TPK-150604
Urinary tract infections in cats
Prevalence of comorbidities and bacterial species, and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility to commonly used antimicrobial agents Article in several languages: deutsch | EnglishPublication History
Received: 27 July 2015
Accepted after major revision: 18 January 2016
Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034911/201604/lookinside/thumbnails/10-15654-tpk-150604_en-1.jpg)
Summary
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of comorbidities (CM) in cats with urinary tract infections (UTIs), as well as the prevalence of bacterial species in cats with different CM and their antimicrobial susceptibility to the commonly used antibacterial agents doxycycline, trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole (TMS), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), cephalothin, and enrofloxacin. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of cats with positive urine cultures in the years 2003 to 2009 was performed. Cats were assigned to one of four groups: cats with systemic comorbidities (sCM), cats with indwelling urinary catheters (iUC), cats with local comorbidities (lCM), or cats without CM. To evaluate the potential effectivity of the antibiotics the antibacterial impact factors were calculated. Results: A total of 194 cats with 219 isolates were included in the study. In 78.4% (152/194) of cats, a CM was identified; 49.5% had a sCM and 28.9% (56/194) had an iUC or a lCM. Cats with sCM were significantly older than cats in all other groups, and the proportion of female animals was higher in cats with sCM than in cats with iUC or lCM. More than half of the cats with sCM did not show clinical signs of lower urinary tract disease. The most commonly isolated bacteria species were Escherichia (E.) coli, Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. with a significantly higher proportion of E. coli isolates in cats with sCM and significantly higher proportions of Streptococcus and Staphylococcus spp. isolates in cats with iUC and other lCM. According to the antimicrobial impact factors bacterial isolates in cats with any CM were most likely susceptible to AMC and TMS. Isolates from cats with iUC and lCM had a lower likelihood to be susceptible to the tested antimicrobials than cats with sCM and cats without CM. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Relevant comorbidities for bacterial urinary tract infection were identified in the majority of cats in the present study. Cats with sCM often do not show clinical signs of lower urinary tract disease. AMC and TMS were the antimicrobial agents with the highest antimicrobial impact factor in this population of cats.
-
Literatur
- 1 Aakra A, Vebo H, Snipen L. et al. Transcriptional response of Enterococcus faecalis V583 of erythromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2246-2259.
- 2 Bailiff NL, Nelson RW, Feldman EC. et al. Frequency and risk factors for urinary tract infection in cats with diabetes mellitus. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 850-855.
- 3 Bailiff NL, Westropp JL, Nelson RW. et al. Evaluation of urine specific gravity and urine sediment as risk factors for urinary tract infections in cats. Vet Clin Pathol 2008; 37: 317-322.
- 4 Ball KR, Rubin JE, Chirino-Trejo M. et al. Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of canine uropathogens at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine Veterinary Teaching Hospital, 2002-2007. Van Vet J 2008; 49: 985-990.
- 5 Barsanti JA, Shotts EB, Crowell WA. et al. Effect of therapy on susceptibility to urinary tract infection in male cats with indwelling urethral catheters. JVet Intern Med 1992; 6: 64-70.
- 6 Barsanti JA. Genitourinary infections. Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat.. Greene CE. St. Louis: Elsevier/Saunders; 2006: 1013-1044.
- 7 Bartges JW, Barsanti JA. Bacterial urinary tract infections in cats. Current Veterinary Therapy XIII.. Bonagura JD. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2000: 880-883.
- 8 Bass M, Howard J, Gerber B. et al. Retrospective study of indications for and outcome of perineal urethrostomy in cats. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 227-231.
- 9 Biering-Sorensen F, Bagi P, Hoiby N. Urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord lesions: treatment and prevention. Drugs 2001; 61: 1275-1287.
- 10 Blondeau JM, Tillotson GS. Formula to help select rational antimicrobial therapy (FRAT): its application to community- and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 12: 145-150.
- 11 Dorsch R, Remer C, Sauter-Louis C. et al. Feline lower urinary tract disease in a German cat population. A retrospective analysis of demographic data, causes and clinical signs. Tierärztl Prax 2014; 42(K): 231-239.
- 12 Dorsch R, Von Vopelius-Feldt C, Wolf G. et al. Feline urinary tract pathogens: prevalence of bacterial species and antimicrobial resistance over a 10-year period. Vet Rec 2015; 176: 201.
- 13 Eisenberg BW, Waldrop JE, Allen SE. et al. Evaluation of risk factors associated with recurrent obstruction in cats treated medically for urethral obstruction. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013; 243: 1140-1146.
- 14 Gerber B, Boretti FS, Kley S. et al. Evaluation of clinical signs and causes of lower urinary tract disease in European cats. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 571-577.
- 15 Griffin DW, Gregory CR. Prevalence of bacterial urinary tract infection after perineal urethrostomy in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992; 200: 681-684.
- 16 Hall JL, Holmes MA, Baines SJ. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of canine urinary tract pathogens. Vet Rec 2013; 173: 549.
- 17 Hernandez J, Bota D, Farbos M. et al. Risk factors for urinary tract infection with multiple drug-resistant Escherichia coli in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 75-81.
- 18 Hugonnard M, Chalvet-Monfray K, Dernis J. et al. Occurrence of bacteriuria in 18 catheterised cats with obstructive lower urinary tract disease: a pilot study. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 843-848.
- 19 Kietzmann M, Niedorf F, Kramer S. et al. Plasma and urine concentrations of marbofloxacin following single subcutaneous administration to cats. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2011; 124: 83-88.
- 20 Labato MA. Uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy XIV. Bonagura JD, Twedt DC. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2009: 918-921.
- 21 Lees GE, Rogers KS. Treatment of urinary tract infections in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 189: 648-652.
- 22 Lekcharoensuk C, Osborne CA, Lulich JP. Epidemiologic study of risk factors for lower urinary tract diseases in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 1429-1435.
- 23 Ling GV, Creighton SR, Ruby AL. Tetracycline for oral treatment of canine urinary tract infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J Am Vet Med Assoc 1981; 179: 578-579.
- 24 Litster A, Moss SM, Honnery M. et al. Prevalence of bacterial species in cats with clinical signs of lower urinary tract disease: recognition of Staphylococcus felis as a possible feline urinary tract pathogen. Vet Microbiol 2007; 121: 182-188.
- 25 Litster A, Moss S, Platell J. et al. Occult bacterial lower urinary tract infections in cats -urinalysis and culture findings. Vet Microbiol 2009; 136: 130-134.
- 26 Martinez-Ruzafa I, Kruger JM, Miller R. et al. Clinical features and risk factors for development of urinary tract infections in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2012; 14: 729-740.
- 27 Mayer-Roenne B, Goldstein RE, Erb HN. Urinary tract infections in cats with hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2007; 9: 124-132.
- 28 Pressler BM, Vaden SL, Lane IF. et al. Candida spp. urinary tract infections in 13 dogs and seven cats: predisposing factors, treatment, and outcome. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 263-270.
- 29 Ronald A. The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Dis Mon 2003; 49: 71-82.
- 30 Saevik BK, Trangerud C, Ottesen N. et al. Causes of lower urinary tract disease in Norwegian cats. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 410-417.
- 31 Weese JS, Blondeau JM, Boothe D. et al. Antimicrobial use guidelines for treatment of urinary tract disease in dogs and cats: antimicrobial guidelines working group of the international society for companion animal infectious diseases. Vet Med Int 2011; 2011: 1-9. 10.4061/2011/263768.
- 32 Werckenthin C, Luhofer G, Bottner A. et al. Layout proposal for a microtitre plate to be used in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from infections of dogs and cats. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2008; 121: 19-26.
- 33 White JD, Stevenson M, Malik R. et al. Urinary tract infections in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 459-465.