Dowel pinning for metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs

Summary

Objective: To evaluate a dowel pinning technique for metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. Material and methods: Medical records of 13 dogs with complete clinical and radiographic follow-up exami nations after a median observation time of 5 months were evaluated retrospectively. Assessment included fracture data, number of stabilized bones versus number of fractured bones and parameters of internal fixation including postoperative axial alignment and position of implants assessed on serial radiographs. Complications during the healing period and the final radiographic and functional outcome were analysed in relation to the details of fracture fixation. Results: Most dogs in this study (mean age: 2.9 years, mean weight: 9.9 kg) had fractures of three or four bones, and fractures were closed in all but one dog. All fractures involved the metacarpal/metatarsal body, and all but five were transverse. The size of Kirschner wires used for dowel pinning ranged from 0.8 to 2.0 mm, and the length in relation to bone length ranged from 39 to 91%. Axial alignment of internal fixa tion was and remained anatomically correct and the dowel pins remained in place in all but one dog. This dog had open metatarsal fractures and dowel pinning was contraindicated. Additionally, the Kirschner wires perforated the cortex of the proximal segments, which resulted in implant migration, malunion and residual lameness. The other dogs achieved complete functional union even though seven of 13 dogs developed radiographic signs of synostosis. Clinical significance: Although the number of dogs in this study was small, dowel pinning was shown to be technically straightforward, inexpensive and effective for surgical repair of canine metacarpal and metatarsal bone fractures. Further studies should focus on the need for and duration of additional external coaptation.

Keywords

Dog - fracture - metacarpus - metatarsus - osteosynthesis

• Literatur

• 1 Anderson MA, Payne JT, Constantinescu GM. Managing fractures and related injuries of the distal extremities in dogs and cats. Vet Med 1993; 88: 957-968.
• 2 Benedetti LT, Berry K, Bloomberg M. A technique for intramedullary pinning of metatarsals and metacarpals in cats and dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 149-152.
• 3 Dee JF. Fractures of the metacarpal and metatarsal bones. In: AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. 1st ed.. Johnson AL, Houlton JEF, Vannini R. eds. New York: Thieme; 2005: 360-368.
• 4 Degasperi B, Gradner G, Dupré G. Intramedullary pinning of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in cats using a simple distraction technique. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 382-388.
• 5 De La Puerta B, Emmerson T, Moores AP. et al. Epoxy putty external skeletal fixation for fractures of the four main metacarpal and metatarsal bones in cats and dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 451-458.
• 6 Fitzpatrick N, Riordan JO, Smith TJ. et al. Combined intramedullary and external skeletal fixation of metatarsal and metacarpal fractures in 12 dogs and 19 cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 1015-1022.
• 7 Kapatkin A, Howe-Smith R, Shofer F. Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13: 123-127.
• 8 Kornmayer M, Failing K, Matis U. Long-term prognosis of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 45-53.
• 9 Lösslein LK. Metakarpal- und Metatarsalfrakturen bei Hund und Katze. Behandlung und Ergebnisse in den Jahren 1975–1981. Dissertation Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; 1982
• 10 Manley PA. Distal extremity fractures in small animals. J Vet Orthop 1981; 2: 38-48.
• 11 Muir P, Norris JL. Metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1997; 38: 344-348.
• 12 Ness MG, Abercromby RH, May C. et al. A survey of orthopaedic conditions in small animal veterinary practice in Britain. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 9: 43-52.
• 13 Okumura M, Watanabe K, Kadosawa T. et al. Surgical salvage from comminuted metatarsal fracture using a weight-bearing pin-putty apparatus in a dog. Aust Vet J 2000; 78: 95-98.
• 14 Phillips IR. A survey of bone fractures in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1979; 20: 661-674.
• 15 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Fractures and other orthopedic conditions of the carpus, metacarpus, and phalanges. In: Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4th ed.. Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. eds. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006: 412-420.
• 16 Risselada M, Verleyen P, van Bree H. et al. The use of an external skeletal traction device for distal fractures in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 131-135.
• 17 Seibert RL, Lewis DD, Coomer AR. et al. Stabilisation of metacarpal or metatarsal fractures in three dogs, using circular external fixation. N Z Vet J 2011; 59: 96-103.
• 18 Zahn K, Kornmayer M, Matis U. Dowel pinning for feline metacarpal and metatarsal fractures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 256-263.