Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2022-S112
It is time anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies be considered first-line prophylaxis for migraine
Já é tempo de os anticorpos monoclonais anti-CGRP serem reconhecidos como profilaxia de primeira linha para a migrâneaABSTRACT
The result of more than thirty years of research, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are currently the state of the art for migraine preventive therapy. Their efficacy and safety, supported by an already large and growing body of evidence, are added by many other advantages: an early onset of action, favorable posology, negligible pharmacological interaction, and a broad-reaching efficacy in many challenging clinical contexts. When compared to standard prophylactics, these novel medications seem at least as efficacious, clearly more tolerable and, consequently, with a superior adherence profile. Furthermore, recently published analyses indicate that they are cost-effective, especially among those with chronic migraine. Yet, current guidelines endorse their use only after multiple other preventives have failed or have been deemed not tolerable. Although this recommendation may have been sensible at first, the now available data strongly point that time has come for anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies to be acknowledged as first-line treatments for migraine patients with severe disability. For these individuals, delaying treatment until several other alternatives have failed incurs in significant losses, both economically and to many relevant aspects of their lives.
RESUMO
Frutos de mais de 30 anos de pesquisa, os anticorpos monoclonais anti-CGRP são atualmente o que há de mais moderno no tratamento preventivo da migrânea. À sua eficácia e segurança, já bem estabelecidos por um grande corpo de evidências, acrescentam-se outras vantagens: um início precoce de ação, posologia favorável, mínima interação farmacológica, e eficácia comprovada em uma variedade de contextos clínicos frequentemente desafiadores. Quando comparados a outros profiláticos, estas medicações aparentam ser ao menos tão eficazes, evidentemente mais toleráveis e, portanto, com melhor perfil de adesão. Ademais, estudos recentemente publicados indicam que elas são custo-efetivas, especialmente entre pacientes com migrânea crônica. Ainda assim, as diretrizes atuais orientam o seu uso apenas caso haja refratariedade ou intolerância a múltiplos outros preventivos. Apesar de esta recomendação poder ter sido sensata a priori, os dados disponíveis atualmente corroboram que já é tempo de estes anticorpos monoclonais serem reconhecidos como tratamentos de primeira linha para a migrânea associada à incapacidade grave. Para estes pacientes, demorar a oferecer este tratamento até que outras múltiplas alternativas tenham falhado, leva a perdas significativas, tanto economicamente quanto em múltiplos outros aspectos relevantes das suas vidas.
Keywords:
Migraine Disorders - Antibodies, Monoclonal - Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists - Cost-Benefit AnalysisPalavras-chave:
Transtornos de Enxaqueca - Anticorpos Monoclonais - Antagonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo Relacionado ao Gene de Calcitonina - Análise Custo-BenefícioAuthors contributions:
GTK: was responsible for the literature review, writing and reviewing of the manuscript.
Publication History
Received: 18 March 2022
Accepted: 29 April 2022
Article published online:
06 February 2023
© 2022. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Tepper SJ. History and review of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) therapies: from translational research to treatment. Headache 2018; 58 (Suppl. 03) 238-275 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13379
- 2 Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol 2018; 14 (06) 338-350 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1
- 3 Hargreaves R, Olesen J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulators - the history and renaissance of a new migraine drug class. Headache 2019; 59 (06) 951-970 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13510
- 4 Ban TA. The role of serendipity in drug discovery. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2006; 8 (03) 335-344 https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.3/tban
- 5 Vandervorst F, Deun LV, Dycke AV, Paemeleire K, Reuter U, Schoenen J. et al. CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: an efficacy and tolerability comparison with standard prophylactic drugs. J Headache Pain 2021; 22 (01) 128 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01335-2
- 6 Overeem LH, Raffaelli B, Mecklenburg J, Kelderman T, Neeb L, Reuter U. Indirect comparison of topiramate and monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or its receptor for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine: a systematic review with meta-analysis. CNS Drugs 2021; 35 (08) 805-820 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-021-00834-9
- 7 Detke HC, Millen BA, Zhang Q, Samaan K, Ailani J, Dodick DW. et al. Rapid onset of effect of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: analysis of the EVOLVE studies. Headache 2020; 60 (02) 348-359 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13691
- 8 Takeshima T, Nakai M, Shibasaki Y, Ishida M, Kim B-K, Ning X. et al. Early onset of efficacy with fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine: subanalysis of two phase 2b/3 trials in Japanese and Korean patients. J Headache Pain 2022; 23 (01) 24-24 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01393-0
- 9 Schwedt T, Reuter U, Tepper S, Ashina M, Kudrow D, Broessner G. et al. Early onset of efficacy with erenumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2018; 19 (01) 92-92 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0923-6
- 10 Szkutnik-Fiedler D. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug-drug interactions of new anti-migraine drugs-lasmiditan, gepants, and Calcitonin-Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibodies. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12 (12) 1180-1180 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12121180
- 11 Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine with medication overuse: real-life effectiveness and predictors of response at 6 months. J Headache Pain 2021; 22 (01) 120-120 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01328-1
- 12 Pavlovic JM, Paemeleire K, Göbel H, Bonner J, Rapoport A, Kagan R. et al. Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine. J Headache Pain 2020; 21 (01) 95-95 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01167-6
- 13 Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet 2018; 392 10161 P2280-P2287 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0
- 14 Okonkwo R, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Stroud C, Paget M-A, Matharu MS, Tassorelli C. Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with migraine and history of failure to 3-4 preventive medication categories: subgroup analysis from CONQUER study. J Headache Pain 2021; 22 (01) 113-113 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01322-7
- 15 Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, Reuter U, Terwindt G, Mitsikostas D-D. et al. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain 2019; 20 (01) 58-58 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0972-5
- 16 Burch RC, Ailani J, Robbins MS. The American Headache Society consensus statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache 2022; 62 (01) 111-112 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14245
- 17 Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M. et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ 2016; 353: i2089-i2089 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2089
- 18 Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J. et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64 (04) 401-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
- 19 Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M, Osipova V. et al. ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 2018; 38 (06) 1026-1037 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102418759786
- 20 Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F. et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (22) 2123-2132 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705848
- 21 Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S. et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16 (06) P425-P434 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2
- 22 Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T. et al. Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 319 (19) 1999-2008 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.4853
- 23 Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T. et al. Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (22) 2113-2122 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709038
- 24 Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: The EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2018; 75 (09) 1080-1088 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212
- 25 Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim B-K, Yang JY. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia 2018; 38 (08) 1442-1454 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102418779543
- 26 Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology 2018; 91 (24) e2211-e2221 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.2022s1122022s1126640
- 27 Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J. et al. Eptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1). Cephalalgia 2020; 40 (03) 241-254 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420905132
- 28 Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J. et al. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020. 94. 13 e1365-e1377 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.2022s1122022s1129169
- 29 Buse DC, Gandhi SK, Cohen JM, Ramirez-Campos V, Cloud B, Yang R. et al. Improvements across a range of patient-reported domains with fremanezumab treatment: results from a patient survey study. J Headache Pain 2020; 21 (01) 109-109 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01177-4
- 30 Ford J, Tassorelli C, Leroux E, Wang S, Ayer D, Nichols R. et al. Changes in patient functioning and disability: results from a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating galcanezumab for chronic migraine prevention (REGAIN). Qual Life Res 2021; 30 (01) 105-115 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02623-1
- 31 Ailani J, Andrews JS, Rettiganti M, Nicholson RA. Impact of galcanezumab on total pain burden: findings from phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic or chronic migraine (EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN trials). J Headache Pain 2020; 21 (01) 123-123 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01190-7
- 32 Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick DW, Xue F. et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol 2021; 28 (05) 1716-1725 https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14715
- 33 Hirata K, Takeshima T, Sakai F, Tatsuoka Y, Suzuki N, Igarashi H. et al. A long-term open-label safety study of galcanezumab in Japanese patients with migraine. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20 (06) 721-733 https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2021.1866536
- 34 Camporeale A, Kudrow D, Sides R, Wang S, Van Dycke A, Selzler KJ. et al. A phase 3, long-term, open-label safety study of galcanezumab in patients with migraine. BMC Neurol 2018; 18 (01) 188-188 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1193-2
- 35 Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Yeung PP, Cohen JM, Ning X, Yang R. et al. Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fremanezumab in migraine: a randomized study. Neurology 2020; 95 (18) e2487-e2499 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.2022s1120000010600
- 36 Tepper SJ, Diener H-C, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U. et al. Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology 2019; 92 (20) e2309-e2320 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.2022s1122022s1127497
- 37 Dodick DW, Doty EG, Aurora SK, Ruff DD, Stauffer VL, Jedynak J. et al. Medication overuse in a subgroup analysis of phase 3 placebo-controlled studies of galcanezumab in the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2021; 41 (03) 340-352 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420966658
- 38 Silberstein SD, Cohen JM, Seminerio MJ, Yang R, Ashina S, Katsarava Z. The impact of fremanezumab on medication overuse in patients with chronic migraine: subgroup analysis of the HALO CM study. J Headache Pain 2020; 21 (01) 114-114 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01173-8
- 39 Diener H-C, Marmura MJ, Tepper SJ, Cowan R, Starling AJ, Diamond ML. et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of eptinezumab in patients with a dual diagnosis of chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache: subgroup analysis of PROMISE-2. Headache 2021; 61 (01) 125-136 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14036
- 40 Mulleners WM, Kim B-K, Láinez MJA, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang S. et al. Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19 (10) 814-825 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9
- 41 Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, Galic M, Cohen JM, Yang R. et al. Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet 2019; 394 10203 1030-1040 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31946-4
- 42 Cision. Lundbeck reports positive results for Vyepti[®] (eptinezumab) from the DELIVER study in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures [Internet]. News Powered by Cision. 2021 Nov 1 [cited 2022 Mar 13]. Available from: https://news.cision.com/h--lundbeck-a-s/r/lundbeck-reports-positive-results-for-vyepti---eptinezumab--from-the-deliver-study-in-patients-with-,c3443462
- 43 Alpuente A, Gallardo VJ, Caronna E, Torres-Ferrús M, Pozo-Rosich P. Partial and nonresponders to OnabotulinumtoxinA can benefit from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies preventive treatment: a real-world evidence study. Eur J Neurol 2021; 28 (07) 2378-2382 https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14828
- 44 Ailani J, Pearlman E, Zhang Q, Nagy AJ, Schuh K, Aurora SK. Positive response to galcanezumab following treatment failure to OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with migraine: post hoc analyses of three randomized double-blind studies. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27 (03) 542-549 https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14102
- 45 Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 2014; 20 (01) 22-33 https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22
- 46 Winner PK, Spierings ELH, Yeung PP, Aycardi E, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M. et al. Early onset of efficacy with fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Headache 2019; 59 (10) 1743-1752 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13654
- 47 Winner PK, McAllister P, Chakhava G, Ailani J, Ettrup A, Josiassen MK. et al. Effects of intravenous eptinezumab vs placebo on headache pain and most bothersome symptom when initiated during a migraine attack: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021; 325 (23) 2348-2356 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7665
- 48 Russell FA, King R, Smillie S-J, Kodji X, Brain SD. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 2014; 94 (04) 1099-1142 https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2013
- 49 Mullin K, Kudrow D, Croop R, Lovegren M, Conway CM, Coric V. et al. Potential for treatment benefit of small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist plus monoclonal antibody in migraine therapy. Neurology 2020; 94 (20) e2121-e2125 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.2022s1122022s1128944
- 50 Deng H, Li G-G, Nie H, Feng Y-Y, Guo G-Y, Guo W-L. et al. Efficacy and safety of calcitonin-gene-related peptide binding monoclonal antibodies for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 2020; 20 (01) 57-57 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01633-3
- 51 Stauffer VL, Wang S, Bonner J, Kim B, Bhandari R, Day KA. et al. Evaluation of injection-site-related adverse events with galcanezumab: a post hoc analysis of phase 3 studies in participants with migraine. BMC Neurol 2020; 20 (01) 194-194 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01775-4
- 52 Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ. et al. Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: a pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia 2019; 39 (14) 1798-1808 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419888222
- 53 Sun H, Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Ashina M. et al. Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (04) 382-390 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00019-3
- 54 Baker B, Schaeffler B, Hirman J, Hompesch M, Pederson S, Smith J. Tolerability of eptinezumab in overweight, obese or type 1 diabetes patients. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2021; 4 (02) e00217 https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.217
- 55 Saely S, Croteau D, Jawidzik L, Brinker A, Kortepeter C. Hypertension: a new safety risk for patients treated with erenumab. Headache 2021; 61 (01) 202-208 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14051
- 56 Kudrow D, Pascual J, Winner PK, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Reuter U. et al. Vascular safety of erenumab for migraine prevention. Neurology 2020; 94 (05) e497-510
- 57 Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Ailani J, Pannacciulli N, Navetta MS, Loop B. et al. Risk of hypertension in erenumab-treated patients with migraine: analyses of clinical trial and postmarketing data. Headache 2021; 61 (09) 1411-1420 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14208
- 58 Reuter U, Ehrlich M, Gendolla A, Heinze A, Klatt J, Wen S. et al. Erenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine - a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trial. Cephalalgia 2022; 42 (02) 108-118 https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211053571
- 59 Kowacs F, Roesler CAP, Piovesan ÉJ, Sarmento EM, Campos HC, Maciel Jr JA. et al. Consensus of the Brazilian Headache Society on the treatment of chronic migraine. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2019; 77 (07) 509-520 https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20190078
- 60 Agostoni EC, Barbanti P, Calabresi P, Colombo B, Cortelli P, Frediani F. et al. Current and emerging evidence-based treatment options in chronic migraine: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2019; 20 (01) 92-92 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1038-4
- 61 Lu J, Zhang Q, Guo X, Liu W, Xu C, Hu X. et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody versus botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: evidence from indirect treatment comparison. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12: 631204-631204 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.631204
- 62 Herd CP, Tomlinson CL, Rick C, Scotton WJ, Edwards J, Ives NJ. et al. Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of botulinum toxin for the prevention of migraine. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (07) e027953 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027953
- 63 Pijpers JA, Kies DA, Louter MA, van Zwet EW, Ferrari MD, Terwindt GM. Acute withdrawal and botulinum toxin A in chronic migraine with medication overuse: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Brain 2019; 142 (05) 1203-1214 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz052
- 64 Ali A. Delay in OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic-perspectives from a virus hotspot. Headache 2020; 60 (06) 1183-1186 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13830
- 65 Gonzalez-Martinez A, Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Guerrero ÁL, García-Azorín D, Santos-Lasaosa S, Navarro-Pérez MP. et al. Effects of the OnabotulinumtoxinA follow-up delay in migraine course during the COVID-19 lockdown. Neurol Sci 2021; 42 (12) 5087-5092 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05180-8
- 66 GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17 (11) P954-P976 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3
- 67 GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392 10159 P1789-P1858 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7
- 68 Bonafede M, Sapra S, Shah N, Tepper S, Cappell K, Desai P. Direct and indirect healthcare resource utilization and costs among migraine patients in the United States. Headache 2018; 58 (05) 700-714 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13275
- 69 Diener H-C, Holle D, Solbach K, Gaul C. Medication-overuse headache: risk factors, pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12 (10) 575-583 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.124
- 70 Raggi A, Leonardi M, Sansone E, Curone M, Grazzi L, D’Amico D. The cost and the value of treatment of medication overuse headache in Italy: a longitudinal study based on patient-derived data. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27 (01) 62-e1 https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14034
- 71 Stewart WF, Wood GC, Manack A, Varon SF, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Employment and work impact of chronic migraine and episodic migraine. J Occup Environ Med 2010; 52 (01) 8-14 https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181c1dc56
- 72 Shimizu T, Sakai F, Miyake H, Sone T, Sato M, Tanabe S. et al. Disability, quality of life, productivity impairment and employer costs of migraine in the workplace. J Headache Pain 2021; 22 (01) 29-29 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01243-5
- 73 Seddik AH, Schiener C, Ostwald DA, Schramm S, Huels J, Katsarava Z. Social impact of prophylactic migraine treatments in Germany: a state-transition and open cohort approach. Value Health 2021; 24 (10) 1446-1453 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1281
- 74 Oliveira AB, Queiroz LP, Rocha-Filho PS, Sarmento EM, Peres MF. Annual indirect costs secondary to headache disability in Brazil. Cephalalgia 2020; 40 (06) 597-605 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419889357
- 75 Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Murray S, Dumas PK, Adams AM. et al. Life with migraine: effects on relationships, career, and finances from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache 2019; 59 (08) 1286-1299 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13613
- 76 Martelletti P, Schwedt TJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Quintana R, Carboni V, Diener H-C. et al. My Migraine Voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed. J Headache Pain 2018; 19 (01) 115-115 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0946-z
- 77 Buse DC, Scher AI, Dodick DW, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Adams AM. et al. Impact of migraine on the family: perspectives of people with migraine and their spouse/domestic partner in the CaMEO study. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; S0025-6196 (16) 00126-00129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.013
- 78 Buse DC, Powers SW, Gelfand AA, VanderPluym JH, Fanning KM, Reed ML. et al. Adolescent perspectives on the burden of a parent’s migraine: results from the CaMEO study. Headache 2018; 58 (04) 512-524 https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13254
- 79 Sussman M, Benner J, Neumann P, Menzin J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of erenumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: results from the US societal and payer perspectives. Cephalalgia 2018; 38 (10) 1644-1657 https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102418796842
- 80 Mahon R, Lang A, Vo P, Huels J, Cooney P, Danyliv A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine in patients with prior treatment failures in Sweden. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39 (03) 357-372 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00996-2