Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2022-S129
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: what have we learned?
Inibidores de checkpoint imunológico para glioblastoma: o que aprendemos?ABSTRACT
Background: Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor, remains a lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their role in glioblastoma is uncertain. Objective: To review the state of immunotherapies in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on recently published ICPi clinical trials. Methods: In this editorial/opinion article, we critically review results of the first generation of trials of ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in glioblastoma, as well as future directions. Results: Expression of PD-L1 is frequent in glioblastoma, ranging from 60-70% of patients. Phase 1 studies of nivolumab with and without ipilimumab, as well as pembrolizumab, showed no new safety concerns in brain tumors, and no neurotoxicity. However, randomized phase 3 trials of nivolumab showed no survival improvements over bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma; no role in newly diagnosed disease as a replacement for temozolomide in unmethylated MGMT promoter tumors; and no benefit as an addition to temozolomide in methylated MGMT tumors. However, studies examining post treatment tumor samples have shown signs of increased immunologic response, and occasional long lasting radiographic responses have been seen. A small study of pembrolizumab suggested a potential role as a “neoadjuvant” treatment in resectable recurrent glioblastoma, while other studies are investigating selection of patients with higher mutational burden and novel agents and combinatorial strategies. Conclusion: Despite initial negative trials, immunotherapy remains of high interest in glioblastoma, and many trials are still ongoing. Improving our mechanistic understanding of the immunosuppression and T cell dysfunction induced by both tumor and the CNS microenvironment remains however crucial for the development of successful immunotherapeutic approaches in this disease.
RESUMO
Antecedentes: Glioblastoma é o tumor cerebral primário maligno mais comum e continua sendo uma doença letal com poucas opções terapêuticas. As imunoterapias, em especial, os inibidores de checkpoint imunológico (ICPi), revolucionaram o tratamento do câncer, mas seu papel no glioblastoma é incerto. Objetivo: Revisar o estado atual do papel das imunoterapias no glioblastoma, com ênfase nos ensaios clínicos ICPi publicados recentemente. Métodos: Neste artigo de revisão, analisamos criticamente os resultados da primeira geração de estudos de ipilimumab, nivolumab e pembrolizumab em glioblastoma, bem como as perspectivas futuras. Resultados: A expressão de PD-L1 é frequente no glioblastoma, variando de 60-70% dos pacientes. Estudos de fase 1 de nivolumab com e sem ipilimumab, bem como pembrolizumab, não revelaram novas questões de tolerabilidade nem neurotoxicidade. No entanto, ensaios randomizados de fase 3 de nivolumab não apontaram melhorias na sobrevida em relação ao bevacizumab em glioblastoma recorrente, nenhum papel na doença recém-diagnosticada como substituto da temozolomida em tumores promotores de MGMT não metilados e nenhum benefício como adição à temozolomida em tumores MGMT metilados. No entanto, estudos que examinaram amostras de tumores pós-tratamento mostraram sinais de aumento da resposta imunológica, e respostas radiográficas ocasionais de longa duração foram observadas. Um pequeno estudo de pembrolizumab sugeriu um papel potencial como tratamento “neoadjuvante” no glioblastoma recorrente ressecável, ao passo que outros estudos estão investigando a seleção de pacientes com maior carga mutacional e novos agentes e estratégias combinatórias. Conclusão: Apesar dos ensaios iniciais negativos, a imunoterapia continua sendo de grande interesse no glioblastoma, e muitos ensaios ainda estão em andamento. No entanto, melhorar a nossa compreensão dos mecanismos de imunossupressão e disfunção das células T induzidas tanto pelo tumor quanto pelo microambiente do SNC continua sendo crucial para o desenvolvimento de abordagens imunoterapêuticas bem-sucedidas nesta doença.
Palavras-chave:
Glioblastoma - Imunoterapia - Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico - Nivolumabe - PembrolizumabePublication History
Received: 28 March 2022
Accepted: 29 April 2022
Article published online:
06 February 2023
© 2022. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Suarez-Almazor ME, Kim ST, Abdel-Wahab N, Diab A. Review: immune-related adverse events with use of checkpoint inhibitors for immunotherapy of cancer. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017; 69 (04) 687-699 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40043
- 2 Lucca LE, Hafler DA. Co-inhibitory blockade while preserving tolerance: checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma. Immunol Rev 2017; 276 (01) 9-25 https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12529
- 3 Omuro A, DeAngelis LM. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. JAMA 2013; 310 (17) 1842-1850 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280319
- 4 Geraldo LH, Xu Y, Jacob L, Pibouin-Fragner L, Rao R, Maissa N. et al. SLIT2/ROBO signaling in tumor-associated microglia and macrophages drives glioblastoma immunosuppression and vascular dysmorphia. J Clin Invest 2021; 131 (16) e141083 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI141083
- 5 Jansen JA, Omuro A, Lucca LE. T cell dysfunction in glioblastoma: a barrier and an opportunity for the development of successful immunotherapies. Curr Opin Neurol 2021; 34 (06) 827-833 https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.2022s1292022s1290988
- 6 Omuro A, Vlahovic G, Lim M, Sahebjam S, Baehring J, Cloughesy T. et al. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20 (05) 674-686 https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox208
- 7 Reardon DA, Brandes AA, Omuro A, Mulholland P, Lim M, Wick A. et al. Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: the checkmate 143 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6 (07) 1003-1010 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024
- 8 Omuro A, Reardon DA, Sampson JH, Baehring J, Sahebjam S, Cloughesy TF. et al. Nivolumab plus radiotherapy with or without temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4 (01) vdac025 https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac025
- 9 Reardon DA, Kim TM, Frenel J-S, Simonelli M, Lopez J, Subramaniam DS. et al. Treatment with pembrolizumab in programmed death ligand 1-positive recurrent glioblastoma: results from the multicohort phase 1 KEYNOTE-028 trial. Cancer 2021; 127 (10) 1620-1629 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33378
- 10 Nayak L, Molinaro AM, Peters K, Clarke JL, Jordan JT, Groot J. et al. Randomized Phase II and biomarker study of pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab versus pembrolizumab alone for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27 (04) 1048-1057 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2500
- 11 Sahebjam S, Forsyth PA, Tran ND, Arrington JA, Macaulay R, Etame AB. et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: results from a phase I study. Neuro Oncol 2020; 23 (04) 677-686 https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa260
- 12 Cloughesy TF, Mochizuki AY, Orpilla JR, Hugo W, Lee AH, Davidson TB. et al. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat Med 2019; 25 (03) 477-486 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7
- 13 Schalper KA, Rodriguez-Ruiz ME, Diez-Valle R, López-Janeiro A, Porciuncula A, Idoate MA. et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab modifies the tumor immune microenvironment in resectable glioblastoma. Nat Med 2019; 25 (03) 470-476 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0339-5
- 14 Groot J, Penas-Prado M, Alfaro-Munoz K, Hunter K, Pei BL, O'Brien B. et al. Window-of-opportunity clinical trial of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma reveals predominance of immune-suppressive macrophages. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22 (04) 539-549 https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz185
- 15 Lukas RV, Rodon J, Becker K, Wong ET, Shih K, Touat M. et al. Clinical activity and safety of atezolizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2018; 140 (02) 317-328 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2955-9
- 16 Zhao J, Chen AX, Gartrell RD, Silverman AM, Aparicio L, Chu T. et al. Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Nat Med 2019; 25 (03) 462-469 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0349-y
- 17 Song E, Mao T, Dong H, Boisserand LSB, Antila S, Bosenberg M. et al. VEGF-C-driven lymphatic drainage enables immunosurveillance of brain tumours. Nature 2020; 577 7792 689-694 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1912-x
- 18 Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, Yuan J, Zaretsky JM, Desrichard A. et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (23) 2189-2199 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1406498