CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2021; 79(01): 51-55
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X-anp-2020-0115
ARTICLE

Trigeminal neuralgia recurrence: a comparison of microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression: a five years follow-up study

Neuralgia do trigêmeo recorrente: uma comparação entre descompressão microvascular e compressão percutânea por balão: um estudo de acompanhamento de cinco anos
1   Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
,
1   Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
,
1   Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
,
2   Universidade Positivo, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
,
2   Universidade Positivo, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
› Author Affiliations

ABSTRACT

Background: About 50% of patients that suffer from trigeminal neuralgia do not experience sustained benefit from the use of oral medication. For their adequate management, a few surgical procedures are available. Of these, percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) and microvascular decompression (MD) are two of the most performed worldwide. In this retrospective study, we present the outcomes of these techniques through estimation of initial pain relief and subsequent recurrence rate. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with medically refractory trigeminal pain surgically treated at Hospital Cajuru, Curitiba, Brazil, with PBC, MD or both between 2013 and 2018 were enrolled into this retrospective study. The post-procedural rate for pain relief and recurrence and associations between patient demographics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: MD had an earlier recurrence time than balloon compression. Of the 37 patients, the mean age was 61.6 years, approximately one third were male and most had type I neuralgia. The most affected branch was the maxillary (V2). The time for recurrence after surgery was on average 11.8 months for PBC and 9.0 months for MD. Complications were seen only with microsurgery. Conclusions: MD presented with a more precocious recurrence of pain than PBC in this article. Moreover, it had a higher recurrence rate than described in the literature as well, which is possibly explained by the type of graft (muscle) that was used to separate the neurovascular structures.

RESUMO

Introdução: Cerca de 50% dos pacientes com neuralgia do trigêmeo não apresenta benefícios a longo prazo com o uso de medicação oral. Para a manutenção do tratamento, algumas opções cirúrgicas estão disponíveis, sendo a compressão percutânea por balão (CPB) e a descompressão microvascular (DM) algumas das modalidades mais realizadas em todo o mundo. Neste estudo retrospectivo, apresentamos os desfechos dessas técnicas por meio de estimativa da melhora inicial da dor e da taxa de recorrência subsequente. Métodos: Trinta e sete pacientes com dor trigeminal refratária ao tratamento medicamentoso tratados cirurgicamente no Hospital Cajuru, Curitiba, Brasil, com CPB, DM ou ambos entre 2013 e 2018 foram incluídos neste estudo retrospectivo. A taxa pós-procedimento para alívio e recorrência da dor e suas associações com a demografia e desfechos dos pacientes foram analisadas. Resultados: A DM foi associada a menor recorrência que a compressão por balão. Entre os 37 pacientes, a idade média foi de 61,6 anos, aproximadamente um terço eram do sexo masculino e a maioria apresentava neuralgia do tipo I. O ramo mais afetado foi o maxilar (V2). O tempo de recorrência após a cirurgia foi em média de 11,8 meses para CPB e 9,0 meses para DM. Foram vistas complicações apenas na microcirurgia. Conclusões: A DM apresentou recidiva mais precoce da dor em comparação à CPB. Além disso, apresentou uma taxa de recorrência mais alta do que a descrita na literatura, o que é possivelmente explicado pelo tipo de enxerto (músculo) usado para separar as estruturas neurovasculares.

Authors’ contributions:

JPGC: investigation, methodology, supervision, validation, writing-original draft and writing-review & editing. TVHFO: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing-original draft and writing-review & editing. AFN: conceptualization, investigation, project administration and supervision. MOT: investigation, methodology and writing-original draft. NVPC: funding acquisition, investigation, methodology and writing-original draft.




Publication History

Received: 24 March 2020

Accepted: 15 June 2020

Article published online:
01 June 2023

© 2021. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Frizzo HM, Veronese RM. Trigeminal neuralgia: an analytic review of the literature. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2004;4(4):212-7.
  • 2 Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413485658
  • 3 van Kleef M, van Genderen WE, Narouze S, Nurmikko TJ, van Zundert J, Geurts JW, et al. 1. Trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Pract. Jul-Aug 2009;9(4):252-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00298.x
  • 4 Cheshire Jr WP. Cranial neuralgias. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015 Aug;21(4 Headache):1072-85. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.20200115202001150194
  • 5 Posso IP, Palmeira CCA, Vieira EBM. Epidemiologia da dor neuropática. Rev Dor. 2016;17(Suppl 1):11-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-0013.20160039
  • 6 Burchiel KJ, Totah A, Zachariah SB. Trigeminal neuralgia surgery. Available from: <http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/248933-overview#a3>
  • 7 Zeme S. The surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Pain Relief. 2016;(4):6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.S4-006
  • 8 Montano N, Conforti G, Bonaventura R, Meglio M, Fernandez E, Papacci F. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:289-99. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S37592
  • 9 Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Brainin M, Burchiel K, Nurmikko T, et al. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Neurology. 2008 Oct;71(15):1183-90. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000326598.83183.04
  • 10 Obermann, M. Treatment options in trigeminal neuralgia. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2010 Mar;3(2):107-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285609359317
  • 11 Xu W, Jiang C, Yu C, Liang W. Percutaneous balloon compression for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression: personal experience of 28 patients. Acta Neurol Belg. 2018 Dec;118(4):561-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-017-0858-8
  • 12 Ying X, Wang H, Deng S, Chen Y, Zhang J, Yu W. Long-term outcome of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia patients older than 80 years: A STROBE-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8199. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.20200115202001158199
  • 13 Inoue T, Goto Y, Prasetya M, Fukushima T. Resection of the suprameatal tubercle in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 May;162(5):1089-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04242-8
  • 14 Sarsam Z, Garcia-Fiñana M, Nurmikko TJ, Varma TR, Eldridge P. The longterm outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;24(1):18-25. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688690903370289
  • 15 Bick SKB, Eskandar EN. Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;28(3):429-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.009
  • 16 Kouzounias K, Schechtmann G, Lind G, Winter J, Linderoth B. Factors that influence outcome of percutaneous balloon compression in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery. 2010 Oct;67(4):925-34; discussion 934. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181eb5230
  • 17 Mendelson ZS, Velagala JR, Kohli G, Heir GM, Mammis A, Liu JK. Pain free outcomes and durability of surgical intervention for trigeminal neuralgia: a comparison of gamma knife and microvascular descompression. World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e732-e746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.141
  • 18 Wang DD, Raygor KP, Cage TA, Ward MM, Westcott S, Barbaro NM, et al. Prospective comparison of long-term pain relief rates after first-time microvascular decompression and stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2018; 128(1): 68-77.
  • 19 Chen JN, Yu WH, Du HG, Jiang L, Dong XQ, Cao J. Prospective comparison of redo microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression as primary surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Nov;61(6):747-52. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0196
  • 20 Yang XS, Li ST, Zhong J, Zhu J, Du Q, Zhou QMJ, et al. Microvascular decompression on patients with trigeminal neuralgia caused by ectatic vertebrobasilar artery complex: technique notes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 May;154(5):793-7; discussion 797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1320-6
  • 21 Sarsam Z, Garcia-Finana M, Nurmikko TJ, Varma TR, Eldridge P. The longterm outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;24(1):18-25. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688690903370289