PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2016; 74(09): 745-749
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20160078
VIEWS AND REVIEWS

Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?

Deslocamentos facetários cervicais traumáticos: abordagem anterior, posterior ou combinada?
Catarina C. Lins
1   Hospital Municipal Dr. Mário Gatti, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, Campinas SP, Brasil;
,
Diego T. Prado
2   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
,
Andrei F. Joaquim
1   Hospital Municipal Dr. Mário Gatti, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, Campinas SP, Brasil;
3   Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brasil.
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Surgical treatment is well accepted for patients with traumatic cervical facet joint dislocations (CFD), but there is uncertainty over which approach is better: anterior, posterior or combined. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the indications for anterior and posterior approaches in the management of CFD. Anterior approaches can restore cervical lordosis, and cause less postoperative pain and less wound problems. Posterior approaches are useful for direct reduction of locked facet joints and provide stronger fixation from a biomechanical point of view. Combined approaches can be used in more complex cases. Although both anterior and posterior approaches can be used interchangeably, there are some patients who may benefit from one of them over the other, as discussed in this review. Surgeons who treat cervical spine trauma should be able to perform both procedures as well as combined approaches to adequately manage CFD and improve patients’ final outcomes.

RESUMO

O tratamento dos deslocamentos facetários cervicais traumáticos (DFC) é preferencialmente cirúrgico, conforme a literatura pertinente, mas há dúvidas quanto a melhor forma de abordagem da coluna: anterior, posterior ou combinada. Realizamos revisão sistemática para avaliar as indicações da abordagem anterior e da posterior nos DFC. A abordagem anterior permite restaurar a lordose cervical, com menor dor no pós-operatório e menos problemas relacionados a ferida cirúrgica. A abordagem posterior permite redução direta dos deslocamentos, bem como pode resultar em uma fixação biomecanicamente mais robusta. Acessos combinados são usados em casos complexos. Embora ambas possam ser usadas, há alguns pacientes que possivelmente se beneficiem preferencialmente de uma abordagem ao invés da outra, como discutido no presente manuscrito. Cirurgiões de coluna devem ser habilitados a realizar ambos os procedimentos para melhor os resultados do tratamento dos DFC.

spine - dislocations - bones fractures - surgery
coluna vertebral - luxações - fraturas ósseas - cirurgia


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 27. Januar 2016

Angenommen: 18. April 2016

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. September 2023

© 2023. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • References

  • 1 Joaquim AF, Patel AA. Subaxial cervical spine trauma: evaluation and surgical decision-making. Global Spine J. 2013;4(1):63-70. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356764
  • 2 Torretti JA, Sengupta DK. Cervical spine trauma. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41(4):255-67. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.36985
  • 3 Joaquim AF, Lawrence B, Daubs M, Brodke D, Patel AA. Evaluation of the subaxial injury classification system. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011;2(2):67-72. doi:10.4103/0974-8237.100057
  • 4 Andreshak JL, Dekutoski MB. Management of unilateral facet dislocations: a review of the literature. Orthopedics. 1996;20(10):917-26.
  • 5 Bartels RH, Donk R. Delayed management of traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation: surgical strategy: report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(3):362-5. doi:10.3171/spi.2002.97.3.0362
  • 6 Ordonez BJ, Benzel EC, Naderi S, Weller, SJ. Cervical facet dislocation: techniques for ventral reduction and stabilization. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(1):18-23. doi:10.3171/spi.2000.92.1.0018
  • 7 An HS. Cervical spine trauma. Spine. 1998;23(24):2713-29. doi:10.1097/00007632-199812150-00011
  • 8 Brodke DS, Anderson PA, Newell DW, Grady MS, Chapman JR. Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches in cervical spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(3):229-35. doi:10.1097/00024720-200306000-00001
  • 9 Kwon BK, Fisher CG, Boyd, MC, Cobb J, Jebson H, Noonan V et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of anterior compared with posterior stabilization for unilateral facet injuries of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007;7(1):1-12. doi:10.3171/SPI-07/07/001
  • 10 Cruz HY, Joaquim AF, Tedeschi H, Patel AA. Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015;73(5):445-9. doi:10.1590/0004-282X20150022
  • 11 Joaquim AF, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H, Cruz HY, Patel AA. Clinical results of patients with subaxial cervical spine trauma treated according to the SLIC score. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37(4):420-4. doi:10.1179/2045772313Y.201600780143
  • 12 Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM levels of evidence: introductory document. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011.
  • 13 Tchorz KM. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1363-6. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b82f5
  • 14 Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032037
  • 15 Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, Rampersaud YR, Oner FC, Aarabi B et al. The surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries: an evidence-based algorithm based on the SLIC classification system. Spine. 2007;32(23):2620-9. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158ce16
  • 16 Hadley MN, Fitzpatrick BC, Sonntag VK, Browner CM. Facet fracture-dislocation injuries of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery. 1992;30(5):661-6. doi:10.1227/00006123-199205000-00001
  • 17 Bucholz RD, Cheung KC. Halo vest versus spinal fusion for cervical injury: evidence from an outcome study. J Neurosurg. 1989;70(6):884-92. doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.6.0884
  • 18 Halliday AL, Henderson BR, Hart BL, Benzel EC. The management of unilateral lateral mass/facet fractures of the subaxial cervical spine: the use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict instability. Spine. 1997;22(22):2614-21. doi:10.1097/00007632-199711150-00007
  • 19 Rorabeck CH, Rock MG, Hawkins RJ, Bourne RB. Unilateral facet dislocation of the cervical spine: an analysis of the results of treatment in 26 patients. Spine. 1987;12(1):23-7. doi:10.1097/00007632-198701000-00004
  • 20 Sears W, Fazl M. Prediction of stability of cervical spine fracture managed in the halo vest and indications for surgical intervention. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(3):426-32. doi:10.3171/jns.1990.72.3.0426
  • 21 Duggal N, Chamberlain RH, Park SC, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR. Unilateral cervical facet dislocation: biomechanics of fixation. Spine. 2005;30(7):E164-8. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000157418.20900.a1
  • 22 Aebi M. Surgical treatment of upper, middle and lower cervical injuries and non-unions by anterior procedures. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(Suppl 1):S33-9. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1120-8
  • 23 Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Zahlawy H, Kato F. Posterior approach for cervical fracture-dislocations with traumatic disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):387-94. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1589-1
  • 24 Johnson MG, Fisher CG, Boyd M, Pitzen T, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF. The radiographic failure of single segment anterior cervical plate fixation in traumatic cervical flexion distraction injuries. Spine. 2004;29(24):2815-20. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000151088.80797.bd
  • 25 Joaquim AF, Murar J, Savage JW, Patel AA. Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of potential preventative measures. Spine J. 2014,14(9):2246-60. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.030
  • 26 Radcliff KE, Koyonos L, Clyde C, Sidhu GS, Fickes M, Hilibrand AS et al. What is the incidence of dysphagia after posterior cervical surgery? Spine. 2013;38(13):1082-8. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318287ec9f
  • 27 Abumi K, Shono Y, Kotani Y, Kaneda K. Indirect posterior reduction and fusion of the traumatic herniated disc by using a cervical pedicle screw system. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(1):30-7.
  • 28 Song KJ, Lee KB. Anterior versus combined anterior and posterior fixation/fusion in the treatment of distraction-flexion injury in the lower cervical spine. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15(1):36-42. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.010