Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20160094
Cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument: MNSI-Brazil
Adaptação transcultural para o português brasileiro do Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument: MNSI-Brasil Support: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás e Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (FAPEG/CAPES). Grant: Programa Pesquisador Visitante Especial (PVE) da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Processo: 88881.068134/2014-01, Proposta: 300665.ABSTRACT
Since 1994, the University of Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center proposed an instrument to measure neuropathies not yet adapted to use in Brazil. Then, this study aimed to adapt cross-culturally the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) into Brazilian Portuguese, verifying its reliability. Thirty diabetic patients were initially evaluated with the adapted version after completed the essential steps to accomplish the cross-cultural adaptation. Twenty-two of them completed the procedures to repeat the measured scores after day 1 (trial 0). The repeated measurements were tested at days 2 or 3 (trial 1) by another rater (inter-rater reliability) and retested at day 20 (trial 2) by one of the attended raters (inter-test reliability). There were not great semantics, linguistics or cultural differences between two versions and excellent reliability was confirmed by intra-class correlation coefficient above 0.840. It was concluded that MNSI in the Brazilian version is reliable and it is ready to use.
RESUMO
Desde 1994, o Centro de Treinamento e Pesquisa em Diabetes da Universidade de Michigan propçs um instrumento não ainda adaptado para uso no Brasil para mensurar neuropatias. O objetivo deste estudo foi adaptar transculturalmente o Mi chigan Neuropathy Sc reening Instrument (MNSI) para o Português brasileiro, verificando sua confiabilidade. Trinta pacientes diabéticos foram inicialmente avaliados pela versão adaptada depois de completados os passos essenciais para finalizar a adaptação transcultural. Vinte e dois deles completaram os procedimentos para repetir os escores medidos depois do dia 1 (ensaio 0). As medidas repetidas foram testadas nos dias 2 ou 3 (ensaio 1) por outro examinador (confiabilidade interexaminador) e retestadas no dia 20 (ensaio 2) por um dos examinadores participantes (confiabilidade interteste). Não existiam diferenças semânticas, linguísticas ou culturais entre as duas versões e excelente confiabilidade foi confirmada pelo coeficiente de correlação intra-classe acima de 0,840. Conclui-se que o MNSI na versão brasileira é confiável e está pronto para uso.
Support:
Support: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás e Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (FAPEG/CAPES). Grant: Programa Pesquisador Visitante Especial (PVE) da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Processo: 88881.068134/2014-01, Proposta: 300665.
Publication History
Received: 31 October 2015
Accepted: 16 May 2016
Article published online:
06 September 2023
© 2023. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Boulton AJ, Malik RA, Arezzo JC, Sosenko JM. Diabetic somatic neuropathies. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(6):1458-86. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1458
- 2 Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, Freeman R et al. Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(4):956-62. doi:10.2337/diacare.28.4.956
- 3 Tsapas A, Liakos A, Paschos P, Karagiannis T, Bekiari E, Tentolouris N et al. A simple plaster for screening for diabetic neuropathy: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2014;63(4):584-92. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2013.11.019
- 4 Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Wilson DM, Service FJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O’Brien PC. Risk factors for severity of diabetic polyneuropathy: intensive longitudinal assessment of the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(9):1479-86. doi:10.2337/diacare.22.9.1479
- 5 Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE, Ward JD, Manes C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C et al. Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(4):341-50. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032782
- 6 Rubio JA, Aragón-Sánchez J, Jiménez S, Guadalix G, Albarracín A, Salido C et al. Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team for the diabetic foot. Int J Low Extrem Wounds., 2014;13(1):22-6. doi:10.1177/1534734614521234
- 7 Kasznicki J. Advances in the diagnosis and management of diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10(2):345-54. doi:10.5114/aoms.2014.42588
- 8 American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35 Suppl 1:S11-63. doi:10.2337/dc12-s011
- 9 Moghtaderi A, Bakhshipour A, Rashidi H. Validation of Michigan neuropathy screening instrument for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006;108(5):477-81. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.08.003
- 10 Feldman EL, Stevens MJ, Thomas PK, Brown MB, Canal N, Greene DA. A practical two-step quantitative clinical and electrophysiological assessment for the diagnosis and staging of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(11):1281-9. doi:10.2337/diacare.17.11.1281
- 11 Lunetta M, Le Moli R, Grasso G, Sangiorgio L. A simplified diagnostic test for ambulatory screening of peripheral diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998;39(3):165-72. doi:10.1016/S0168-8227(98)00005-9
- 12 Carvalho AB, Garcia JBS, Silva TKm, Ribeiro JVF. [Translation and transcultural adaptation of Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) to Brazilian version]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016;66(1):94-104. Portuguese. doi:10.1016/j.bjan.2013.10.016
- 13 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
- 14 Folstein MF. Mini-mental state examination: clinical guide. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2001.
- 15 Bertolucci PH, Brucki SM, Campacci SR, Juliano Y. [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52(1):1-7. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S0004-282X1994000100001
- 16 Callaghan BC, Cheng HT, Stables CL, Smith AL, Feldman EL. Diabetic neuropathy: clinical manifestations and current treatments. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(6):521-34. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70065-0
- 17 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-40. doi:10.1519/15184.1
- 18 Cunha RA, Costa LO, Hespanhol Junior LC, Pires RS, Kujala UM, Lopes AD. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and clinimetric testing of instruments used to assess patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in the Brazilian population. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(5):332-9. doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.4228
- 19 Mete T, Aydin Y, Saka M, Yavuz HC, Bilen S, Yalcin Y et al. Comparison of efficiencies of michigan neuropathy screening instrument, neurothesiometer, and electromyography for diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:821745. doi:10.1155/2013/821745
- 20 Herman WH, Pop-Busui R, Braffett BH, Martin CL, Cleary PA, Albers JW et al. Use of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument as a measure of distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy in Type 1 diabetes: results from the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):937-44. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03644.x
- 21 George DM. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference: 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
- 22 Boyd LA, Vidoni ED, Wessel BD. Motor learning after stroke: is skill acquisition a prerequisite for contralesional neuroplastic change? Neurosci Lett. 2010;482(1):p. 21-5. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.082
- 23 Zhang Y, Ting RZ, Lam MH, Lam SP, Yeung RO, Nan H et al. Measuring depression with CES-D in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: the validity and its comparison to PHQ-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1):198. doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0580-0