Social support network and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients

David Castro Costa; Maria José Sá; José Manuel Calheiros

doi:10.1590/0004-282X20170036

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2017; 75(05): 267-271
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20170036

ARTICLES

Social support network and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients

Rede de apoio social e qualidade de vida de pacientes com esclerose múltipla

David Castro Costa

¹Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Neurologia, Porto, Portugal;

,

Maria José Sá

¹Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Neurologia, Porto, Portugal;

²Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Porto, Portugal;

,

José Manuel Calheiros

³Universidade Beira Interior, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Covilhã, Portugal.

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective

To analyse the relationship between the social support network (SSN) and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods

The sample comprised 150 consecutive MS patients attending our MS clinic. To assess the socio-demographic data, a specifically designed questionnaire was applied. The HRQOL dimensions were measured with the Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire-SF36 and the SSN with the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. Spearman’s correlation was used to compare the magnitude of the relationship between the SSN and HRQOL.

Results

The mean patient age was 41.7 years (± 10.4; range: 18–70 yr); the mean Expanded Disability Status Score was 2.5 (±2.4; range: 0–9). There was a statistically significant correlation between the structure of the SSN and the HRQOL.

Conclusion

The composition of the SSN, social group membership and participation in voluntary work have an important role in the HRQOL of patients with MS.

RESUMO

Objetivo

Analisar a relação entre a rede de apoio social (RAS) e a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde (QVRS) em pacientes com esclerose múltipla (EM).

Métodos

Foram avaliados consecutivamente 150 pacientes na consulta de esclerose múltipla. As dimensões da QVRS foram medidas com Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire-SF36 e a RAS com o Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. A correlação de Spearman foi utilizada para comparar a magnitude da relação entre a RAS e a QVRS.

Resultados

A idade média dos pacientes foi 41,7 anos (± 10,4; intervalo: 18–70 anos); a média da EDSS foi 2,5 (± 2,4; intervalo: 0–9). Foi encontrada uma correlação estatisticamente significativa entre a estrutura da RAS e a QVRS.

Conclusão

A composição da RAS, a pertença a um grupo social e a participação em trabalho voluntário têm um papel importante na QVRS dos pacientes com MS.

multiple sclerosis - social networking - quality of life

esclerose múltipla - rede social - qualidade de vida

Full Text

References

References
1 Tortorella P, Lagana MM, Saresella M, Tavazzi E, Preti MG, Ricci C et al. Determinants of disability in multiple sclerosis: an immunological and MRI study. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:ID875768. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/875768
2 Tesar N, Baumhackl U, Kopp M, Günther V. Effects of psychological group therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107(6):394-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00077.x
3 Costa DC, Sá MJ, Calheiros JM. The effect of social support on the quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70(2):108-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2012000200007
4 McCabew MP, De Judicibus M. The effects of economic disadvantage on psychological well-being and quality of life among people with multiple sclerosis. J Health Psychol. 2005;10(1):163-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305048562
5 Costa DC, Sá MJAM, Calheiros JM. Social characteristics and quality of life of multiple sclerosis Portuguese patients. Neurol Ther. 2013;2(1):43-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-013-0011-4
6 Pack TG, Szirony GM, Kushner JD, Bellaw JR. Quality of life and employment in persons with multiple sclerosis. Work. 2014;49(2):281-7. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131711
7 Moore P, Harding KE, Clarkson H, Pickersgill TP, Wardle M, Robertson NP. Demographic and clinical factors associated with changes in employment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2013;19(12):1647-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513481396
8 Aljumah M, Alroughani R, Alsharoqi I, Bohlega SA, Dahdaleh M, Deleu D et al. Future of management of multiple sclerosis in the middle East: a consensus view from specialists in ten countries. Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:ID952321. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/952321
9 Garnock-Jones KP. Alemtuzumab: a review of its use in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Drugs. 2014;74(4):489-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-014-0195-7
10 Sá MJ. Exercise therapy and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2014;261(9):1651-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7183-9
11 Ploughman M, Austin MW, Murdoch M, Kearney A, Godwin M, Stefanelli M. The path to self-management: a qualitative study involving older people with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Can. 2012;64(1):6-17. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2010-42
12 Cosio D, Jin L, Siddique J, Mohr DC. The effect of telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy on quality of life among patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):227-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9236-y
13 Costa D, Sá MJ, Calheiros JM. [The effect of social support on the symptoms of depression experienced by Portuguese patients with multiple sclerosis]. Rev Neurol. 2011;53(8):457-62. Spanish.
14 Kohlmann T, Wang C, Lipinski J, Hadker N, Caffrey E, Epstein M et al. The impact of a patient support program for multiple sclerosis on patient satisfaction and subjective health status. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013;45(3):E3-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0b013e31828a4161
15 Finlayson ML, Cho CC. A profile of support group use and need among middle-aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011;54(5):475-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2011.575446
16 Schwartz C, Frohner R. Contribution of demographic, medical, and social support variables in predicting the mental health dimension of quality of life among people with multiple sclerosis. Health Soc Work. 2005;30(3):203-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/30.3.203
17 Rodrigues JS, Ferreira NM. Estrutura e funcionalidade da rede de apoio social do adulto com câncer. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012;25(5):781-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002012000500021
18 Griep RH, Chor D, Faerstein E, Werneck GL, Lopes CS. [Construct validity of the Medical Outcomes Study’s social support scale adapted to Portuguese in the Pro-Saude Study]. Cad Saúde Pública. 2005;21(3):703-14. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000300004 PMID:15868028
19 Forouzan AS, Shushtari JZ, Sajjadi H, Salimi Y, Dejman M. Social Support network among people living with HIV/AIDS in Iran. AIDS Res Treat. 2013;2013:ID715381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715381
20 Aboim S, Vasconcelos P, Wall K. Support, social networks and the family in Portugal: two decades of research. Int Rev Sociol. 2013;23(1):47-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2013.771050
21 Wakefield JR, Bickley S, Sani F. The effects of identification with a support group on the mental health of people with multiple sclerosis. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74(5):420-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.02.002
22 Guilcher SJ, Casciaro T, Lemieux-Charles L, Craven C, McColl MA, Jaglal SB. Social networks and secondary health conditions: the critical secondary team for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(5):330-42. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772312Y.201700360035
23 Soares A, Biasoli I, Scheliga A, Baptista RL, Brabo EP, Morais JC et al. Association of social network and social support with health-related quality of life and fatigue in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(8):2153-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1775-x
24 Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366
25 Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444-52. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
26 Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
27 Ferreira PL. [Development of the Portuguese version of MOS SF-36. Part II: Validation tests]. Acta Med Port. 2000;13(3):119-27. Portuguese.
28 McKeown LP, Porter-Armstrong AP, Baxter GD. Caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis: experiences of support. Mult Scler. 2004;10(2):219-30. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458504ms1008oa
29 Hlebec V, Mrzel M, Kogovsek T. Social support network and received suport at stressful events. Metodoloski zvezki. 2009;6(2):155-71.