A Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Kinesthetic and Visual Motor Imagery Questionnaire

Alan Demanboro; Annette Sterr; Sarah Monteiro dos Anjos; Adriana Bastos Conforto

doi:10.1590/0004-282X20170181

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2018; 76(01): 26-31
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20170181

ARTICLE

A Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Kinesthetic and Visual Motor Imagery Questionnaire

Versão brasileira do Questionário de Imagética Motora Cinestésica e Visual

Alan Demanboro

¹Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas, São Paulo SP, Brasil;

,

Annette Sterr

¹Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas, São Paulo SP, Brasil;

²University of Surrey, School of Psychology, UK;

,

Sarah Monteiro dos Anjos

¹Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas, São Paulo SP, Brasil;

³University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Health Professions, Departments of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Birmingham, AL;

,

Adriana Bastos Conforto

¹Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas, São Paulo SP, Brasil;

⁴Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo SP, Brasil.

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Motor imagery has emerged as a potential rehabilitation tool in stroke. The goals of this study were: 1) to develop a translated and culturally-adapted Brazilian-Portugese version of the Kinesthetic and Visual Motor Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ20-P); 2) to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the scale in a group of patients with stroke and in an age-matched control group; 3) to compare the KVIQ20 performance between the two groups.

Methods Test-retest, inter-rater reliabilities, and internal consistencies were evaluated in 40 patients with stroke and 31 healthy participants.

Results In the stroke group, ICC confidence intervals showed excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities. Cronbach’s alpha also indicated excellent internal consistency. Results for controls were comparable to those obtained in persons with stroke.

Conclusions The excellent psychometric properties of the KVIQ20-P should be considered during the design of studies of motor imagery interventions for stroke rehabilitation.

RESUMO

A Imagética Mental é uma ferramenta em potencial para a reabilitação de indivíduos com doenças cerebrovasculares. Os objetivos desse estudo foram: 1) Desenvolver uma versão traduzida e adaptada culturalmente do Questionário de Imagética Motora Cinestésica e Visual (KVIQ20-P); 2) Avaliar as características psicométricas da escala nesse grupo e em controles; 3) Comparar o desempenho na escala entre os dois grupos.

Métodos Confiabilidades teste-reteste, interexaminador, assim como consistências internas da KVIQ20-P foram avaliadas em 40 indivíduos com AVC e em 31 controles.

Resultados No grupo de pacientes, os intervalos de confiança mostraram excelentes confiabilidades teste-reteste e interexaminador. O alfa de Cronbach indicou uma excelente consistência interna. Os resultados no grupo controle foram comparáveis aos obtidos nos pacientes.

Conclusões As excelentes propriedades psicométricas da KVIQ20-P devem ser consideradas durante o desenho de estudos de Imagética Mental para a reabilitação de indivíduos com doenças cerebrovasculares.

rehabilitation - paresis - stroke - reproducibility of results

reabilitação - paresia - acidente vascular cerebral - reprodutibilidade dos testes

Full Text

References

References
1 Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Durand A, Doyon J. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(1):20-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPT.0000260567.24122.64
2 Sterr A, Conforto AB. Plasticity of adult sensorimotor system in severe brain infarcts: challenges and opportunities. Neural Plast. 2012;2012:970136. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/970136
3 Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(6):842-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.034
4 Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2007;114(10):1265-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z
5 Szameitat AJ1. Shen S, Sterr A. Motor imagery of complex everyday movements. An fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2007;15(34):702-13.
6 Hanakawa T, Dimyan MA, Hallett M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(12):2775-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn036
7 Ueno T, Inoue M, Matsuoka T, Abe T, Maeda H, Morita K. Comparison between a real sequential finger and imagery movements: an FMRI study revisited. Brain Imaging Behav. 2010;4(1):80-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-009-9087-y
8 Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A, Doyon J. Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(4):330-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307313499
9 Randhawa B, Harris S, Boyd LA. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is a reliable tool for individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010;34(3):161-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181e1aa71
10 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Pesquisa nacional por amostras de domicílio contínua. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2015 [cited jan 2015]. Available at: https://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/pesquisas/pesquisa_resultados.php?id_pesquisa=149
11 Almeida OP. [The mini-mental state examination and the diagnosis of dementia in Brazil]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1998;56(3B):605-12. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X1998000400014
12 Groot MH, van Campen JP, Moek MA, Tulner LR, Beijnen JH, Lamoth CJ. The effects of fall-risk-increasing drugs on postural control: a literature review. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(11):901-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0113-9
13 Dulin D, Hatwell Y, Pylyshyn Z, Chokron S. Effects of peripheral and central visual impairment on mental imagery capacity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(8):1396-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.007
14 American Psychiatry Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. DSM - 5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatry Association; 2013.
15 Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 1997;77(8):812-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.8.812
16 Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(1 Suppl 1):S124-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
17 Orfale AG, Araújo PM, Ferraz MB, Natour J. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38(2):293-302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2005000200018
18 Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for participants-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
19 Cha ES, Kim KH, Erlen JA. Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(4):386-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
20 Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
21 Fleiss JL. The Design and analysis of clinical experiments. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37:92-101.
22 Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):309-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
23 Tabrizi YM, Zangiabadi N, Mazhari S, Zolala F. The reliability and validity study of the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(6):588-92. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000124
24 Schuster C, Lussi A, Wirth B, Ettlin T. Two assessments to evaluate imagery ability: translation, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the German KVIQ and Imaprax. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-127
25 Jensen EA, Panitch H, Feng R, Moore PE, Schmidt B. Interobserver reliability of the respiratory physical examination in premature infants: a multicenter study. J Pediatr. 2016;S0022-3476:30641-2.
26 Yang Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Chen C, Xing D. Reliability of functional gait assessment in patients with Parkinson disease: interrater and intrarater reliability and internal consistency. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(34):e4545. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.20170181201701814545
27 Silva, Larissa Rebola Volpi da et al. [Trainability for imagery capacity in individuals post stroke]. Rev Educ Fis UEM. 2012;23:389-98. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v23i3.16747
28 Dickstein R, Deutsch JE. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2007;87(7):942-53. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060331
29 Braun S, Kleynen M, Schols J, Schack T, Beurskens A, Wade D. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(7):579-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508090066
30 Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A, Doyon J. Added value of mental practice combined with a small amount of physical practice on the relearning of rising and sitting post-stroke: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33(4):195-202. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181c2112b