Nuklearmedizin 2016; 55(04): 155-157
DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0743-15-05
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Superiority of SPECT/CT over planar 123I-mIBG images in neuroblastoma patients with impact on Curie and SIOPEN score values

Überlegenheit der SPECT/CT gegenüber planaren 123I-MIBG-Aufnahmen bei Neuroblastom-Patienten mit Auswirkungen auf die Curie- und SIOPENScores
Igor Černý
1   Clinic of Nuclear medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University – Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
,
Jiri Prášek
1   Clinic of Nuclear medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University – Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
,
Helena Kašpárková
1   Clinic of Nuclear medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University – Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received: 21. Mai 2015

accepted in revised form: 11. März 2016

Publikationsdatum:
06. März 2018 (online)

Summary

Objective: The existing most common semi-quantitative systems used for neuroblastoma diagnosis include Curie and SIOPEN scores, which are based on 123I-MIBG planar scans. The purpose of our study was to find out whether a statistically significant difference exists in evaluation based on planar and SPECT/CT scans. We also compared the Curie and SIOPEN methods in terms of their use in regular practice. Patients; method: 45 patients aged 0-10 years; 213 assessments were done in total, and the Curie and SIOPEN scores were determined in each case based on planar and SPECT/CT scans. Student’s T-test and the Bland-Altman plot were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Both methods demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between planar and SPECT/CT evaluation. In the group of 35 patients with neuroblastoma in clinical stages 3 and 4, in 54% of the patients SPECT/CT detected a lesion that was not visible in the planar scan. In 89% of cases, the lesion was confirmed by another imaging method (CT, MRI). In the group of 10 patients in the clinical stage 1, a difference between planar and SPECT/CT scanning was found only in one patient (10%). In the whole set, 25% patients showed a pathological finding only in soft tissues. Conclusion: We recommend to perform semiquantitative evaluation of neuroblastoma based on SPECT/CT scans, particularly in patients in clinical stages 3 and 4. It is advisable to include soft tissues in the score assessment, as well, given that only soft tissues may be involved in up to 25%

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Zu den für die Diagnose des Neuroblastoms am häufigsten verwendeten semiquantitativen Systemen zählen die Curie- und SIOPEN-Scores basierend auf planaren 123I-MIBG-Scans. Mit unserer Studie wollten wir herausfinden, ob bei der Bewertung anhand von planaren vs. SPECT/CT-Aufnahmen statistisch signifikante Unterschiede bestehen. Außerdem haben wir die Curie- und SIOPEN- Methode bezüglich ihrer praktischen Anwendung verglichen. Patienten; Methode: 45 Patienten, Alter 0–10 Jahre; insgesamt 213 Untersuchungen, für jeden Fall wurden anhand der planaren und der SPECT/CT Aufnahmen die Curie- und SIOPEN-Scores ermittelt. Die statistische Auswertung erfolgte mittels t-Test und Bland-Altman-Diagramm. Ergebnisse: Mit beiden Methoden ergaben sich statistisch signifikante Unterschiede (p < 0,0001) zwischen der planaren und der SPECT/CT Beurteilung. In der Gruppe der 35 Neuroblastom-Patienten im klinischen Stadium 3 und 4 deckte die SPECT/CT bei 54% der Fälle eine Läsion auf, die im planaren Scan nicht sichtbar war. In 89% der Fälle wurde die Läsion mit anderen bildgebenden Verfahren (CT, MRT) bestätigt. Bei den 10 Patienten im Stadium 1 fanden wir nur bei einem Patienten (10%) einen Unterschied zwischen planarer und SPEDT/CT-Aufnahme. Im Gesamtkollektiv wiesen 25% der Patienten nur im Weichteilgewebe pathologische Befunde auf. Schlussfolgerung: Wir empfehlen die semiquantitative Beurteilung des Neuroblastoms anhand von SPECT/CT-Scans, besonders bei Patienten im klinischen Stadium 3 und 4. Es empfiehlt sich, auch das Weichteilgewebe in das Scoring einzubeziehen, da in bis zu 25% der Fälle ausschließlich dieses betroffen ist.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ady N, Zucker J-M, Asselain B. et al. A new 123I-MIBG whole body scan scoring method – Application to the prediction of the response of metastases to induction chemotherapy in stage IV neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31: 256-261.
  • 2 Brodeur GM. Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nature Rev Cancer 2003; 3: 203-216.
  • 3 Decarolis B, Schneider C, Hero B. et al Iodine-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy scoring allows prediction of outcome in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: Results of the Cologne Interscore Comparison Study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 944-951.
  • 4 DuBois SG, Kalika Y, Lukens JN. et al. Metastatic sites in stage IV and IVS neuroblastoma correlate with age, tumor biology, and survival. J Pediat Hematol Oncol 1999; 21: 181-189.
  • 5 Frappaz D, Bonneu A, Chauvot Pc. et al Metaiodobenzylguanidine assessment of metastatic neuroblastoma: Observer dependency and chemosensitivity evaluation. Med Pediat Oncol 2000; 34: 237-241.
  • 6 Fukuoka M, Taki J, Mochizuki T, Kinuya S. Comparison of diagnostic value of I-123 MIBG and high-dose I-131 MIBG scintigraphy including incremental value of SPECT/CT over planar image in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma/ paraganglioma and neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med 2011; 36: 1-7.
  • 7 Gelfand MJ, Elgazzar AH, Kriss VM. et al. Iodine-123-MIBG SPECT versus planar imaging in children with neural crest tumors. J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 1753-1757.
  • 8 Katzenstein HM, Cohn SL, Shore RM. et al. Scintigraphic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan correlates with event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 3909-3915.
  • 9 Kushner BH, Yeh SDJ, Kramer K. et al. Impact of metaiodobenzylguanidinescintigraphy on assessing response of high-risk neuroblastoma to dose-intensive induction chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1082-1086.
  • 10 Lewington V, Bar Sever Z, Giammarile F. et al. Development of a semi-quantitative I-123 mIBG reporting method in high risk neuroblastoma. Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts 2009; 50 (Suppl. 02) 1379.
  • 11 Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL. Neuroblastoma. Lancet 2007; 369: 2106-2120.
  • 12 Matthay KK, Edeline V, Lumbroso J. et al. Correlation of early metastatic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy with overall response and event-free survival in stage IV neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2486-2491.
  • 13 Matthay KK, Shulkin B, Ladenstein R. et al. Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: a report for the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force. Br J Cancer 2010; 102: 1319-1326.
  • 14 Mazánek P, Bajčiová V, Štěrba J. et al. Advances in neuroblastoma diagnostics and treatment. Onkológia 2008; 4: 257-261.
  • 15 Messina JA, Cheng S-C, Franc BL. et al. Evaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma. Pediat Blood Cancer 2006; 47: 865-874.
  • 16 Mhiri A, Slim I, Elbez I. et al. The role of MIBG SPECT/CT in children with neuroblastoma compared to planar images. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40: S310.
  • 17 Nakajo M, Shapiro B, Copp J. et al. The normal and abnormal distribution of the adrenomedullary imaging agent m-[I-131]iodobenzylguanidine (I-131 MIBG) in man: Evaluation by scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 1983; 24: 672-682.
  • 18 Naranjo A, Parisi MT, Shulkin BL. et al. Comparison of 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and 131I-MIBG semi-quantitative scores in predicting survival in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 56: 1041-1045.
  • 19 Perel YMD, Conway JMD, Kletzel MMD. et al. Clinical impact and prognostic value of metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging in children with metastatic neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol 1999; 21: 13-18.
  • 20 Philip T, Helson L, Bernard J-L. et al Definition of response and remission in children over one year of age with advanced neuroblastoma: Proposition for a scoring system. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1987; 4: 25-31.
  • 21 Rufini V, Giordano A, Di Giuda D. et al. [123I]MIBG scintigraphy in neuroblastoma: a comparison between planar and SPECT imaging. Q J Nucl Med 1995; 39 (04) (Suppl. 01) 25-28.
  • 22 Sano Y, Okuyama C, Iehara T. et al. New semi-quantitative super123I-MIBG estimation method compared with scoring system in follow-up of advanced neuroblastoma: utility of total MIBG retention ratio versus scoring method. Ann Nucl Med 2012; 26: 462-470.
  • 23 Suc A, Lumbroso J, Rubie H. et al. Metastatic neuroblastoma in children older than one year: prognostic significance of the initial metaiodobenzylguanidine scan and proposal for a scoring system. Cancer 1996; 77: 805-811.
  • 24 Tang HR, Silva AJD, Matthay KK. et al. Neuroblastoma imaging using a combined CT scanner-scintillation camera and 131I-MIBG. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 237-247.
  • 25 Vik TA, Pfluger T, Kadota R. et al. 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in patients with known or suspected neuroblastoma: Results from a prospective multicenter trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009; 52: 784-790.
  • 26 Wartski M, Jehanno N, Petras S. et al. 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT for a higher interpretation confidence in neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40: S382.
  • 27 Yanik GA, Naranjo A, Parisi MT. et al. Validation of postinduction Curie scores in high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (Suppl) 5s (abstr 10031).
  • 28 Yanik GA, Parisi MT, Shulkin BL. et al. Semi-quantitative mIBG scoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Nucl Med 2013; 54: 541-548.