PDA Usage by Japanese Resident Physicians Is Low

Summary

Objectives: Personal digital assistants (PDAs) are in widespread use by resident physicians in many countries, reaching as high as 95% in some reports. Uses are varied and include clinical decision support and support of evidence-based practice. Utilization by resident doctors in Japan has not been characterized. This study was conducted to determine practice patterns of PDA use by Japanese resident physicians.

Methods: A nationwide cohort survey study was distributed to all 1070 residency teaching programs in Japan. The survey included questions pertaining to use of PDAs in clinical practice.

Results: 1124 surveys were returned (response rate of approximately 75%). 297 (30.7%) respondents reported currently using PDAs, while 971 (86.4%) reported having used a PDA in the past. PDA users were more likely to be male (p < 0.05), but no other significant differences were found when examining the following variables: age, training site (university hospital versus community teaching hospital), satisfaction with existing information technology access.

Conclusions: Use of PDAs among Japanese resident physicians is much lower than their counterparts in other countries. In light of this, further research on patient outcomes in Japan and the impact of PDA usage on patient outcomes is urgently needed. If demonstrated to improve outcomes, barriers to adoption need to be identified and overcome.

Keywords

Personal digital assistant - clinical decision support systems - Japan - resident physician

• References

• 1 Fischer S, Stewart TE, Mehta S. et al. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 139-149.
• 2 Berner ES, Houston TK, Ray MN. et al. Improving ambulatory prescribing safety with a handheld decision support system: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (02) 171-179.
• 3 Kho A, Henderson LE, Dressler DD. et al. Use of Handheld Computers in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 531-537.
• 4 OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development).. OECD key ICT indicators. Available at: www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3343.en_2825_495656_33987543_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 4/24/08. Last updated 4/11/06.
• 5 Morris CG, Church L, Vincent C, Rao A. PDA Usage and Training: Targeting Curriculum for Residents and Faculty. Fam Med 2007; 39 (06) 419-424.
• 6 Garritty C, El Emam K. Who’s Using PDAs? Estimates of PDA Use by Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review of Surveys. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8 (02) e7.
• 7 Zaroukian M, Sousa A. Handheld computing in resident education: benefits, barriers, and considerations. Seminars in Medical Practice 2002; 5 (04) 33-44.
• 8 Rudkin SE, Langdorf MI, Macias D, Oman JA, Kazzi AA. Personal digital assistants change management more often than paper texts and foster patient confidence. Eur J Emerg Med 2006; 13 (02) 92-96.
• 9 Patel PD, Greenberg RB, Miller KH, Carter MB, Ziegler CH. Assessing medical students’, residents’ and the public’s perception of the use of personal digital assistants. Med Educ Online (serial online) 2008; 13: 9. doi: 10.3885/meo.2008. Res00258. Available from http://www.med-ed-online.org.
• 10 Johnston JM, Leung GM, Tin KYK. et al. Evaluation of a handheld clinical decision support tool for evidence-based learning and practice in medical undergraduates. Med Educ 2004; 38: 628-637.
• 11 Leung GM, Johnston JM, Tin KYK. et al. Randomised controlled trial of clinical decision support tools to improve learning of evidence based medicine in medical students. BMJ 2003; 327: 1090-1096.
• 12 OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.) OECD Stat Extracts: OECD Health Data 2007.. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/default.aspx?DatasetCode=HEALTH. Accessed 4/24/08.
• 13 Jotkowitz A, Oh J, Tu C. et al. The use of personal digital assistants among medical residents. Med Teach 2006; 28 (04) 382-384.
• 14 Koide D, Peskin E. New uses for computer in medical education, clinical practice, and patient safety in the US and Japan. Progress in Informatics 2005; 2: 3-15.