Synthesis Pengo System plates for the treatment of long-bone diaphyseal fractures in dogs

C. Rahal; C. C. Otoni; O .C. M. Pereira-Júnior; A. L. L. Blum; L. C. Vulcano

doi:10.3415/VCOT-07-05-0049

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21(01): 59-63
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-07-05-0049

Clinical Communication

Schattauer GmbH

Synthesis Pengo System plates for the treatment of long-bone diaphyseal fractures in dogs

C. Rahal

¹School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

,

C. C. Otoni

¹School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

,

O .C. M. Pereira-Júnior

¹School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

,

A. L. L. Blum

²Faculty of Biologic Science and Health, Iguaçu University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

,

L. C. Vulcano

¹School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

A Brazilian orthopaedic company designed a stainless steel plate called Synthesis Pengo System (S.P.S.), which has one fixed and one changeable extremity. According to the assembly of the changeable extremity, it is possible to obtain dynamization or neutralization of the fracture site. Since the S.P.S. plate was developed for use in human patients, the aim of this study was to evaluate this system in long-bone diaphyseal fractures in dogs. Eight dogs with closed diaphyseal fractures of the femur (n= 1), radius and ulna (n=5), and tibia (n=2) were used. Patients were aged seven months to three years and weighed 18 to 31.2 kg. The S.P.S. plate was assembled with one fixed extremity and one changeable extremity in dynamization mode. The trail bar was positioned for synthesis modules with holes for cortical screws. The modules were positioned close to one another in two fractures and far away from the fracture site in the others. The bone healing occurred by external callus. Since motion at the fracture site determines the amount of callus required, the secondary bone healing that was observed in all of the cases indicated less rigid fixation of this system. A potential benefit of this system was a lesser interface contact with the bone since it was only done by trail bar. The major disadvantage was the prominence of the implant. It was possible to conclude that the S.P.S. plate appears to be a suitable method for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures in dogs.

Keywords

Fracture - treatment - plate - dogs - S.P.S.

Full Text

References

References
1 Roe S. Internal fracture fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. (ed). Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Company; 2003: 1798-1818.
2 Stiffer KS. Internal fracture fixation. Clin Tech Small AnimPract 2004; 19: 105-113.
3 Piermattei Piermattei, Flo GL. Fractures: classification, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds). Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Company; 1997: 24-146.
4 Johnson Johnson, Hulse DA. Fundamentals of orthopedic surgery and fracture management. In: Small Animal Surgery. Fossum T. (ed). St. Louis: Mosby; 2002: 821-900.
5 Braden Braden, Prieur WD. New plate for acetabular fractures: technique of application and long-term follow-up evaluation. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 10: 1183-1186.
6 Montavon PM, Pohler OEM, Olmstead ML. et al. The mini instrument and implant set and its clinical application. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1988; 1: 44-51.
7 Bruse Bruse, Prieur WD. The use ofveterinarycuttable plate (VCP) in 160 cases. Tierarztl Prax 1996; 24: 581-589.
8 Li A, Gibson N, Carmichael S. et al. Thirteen pancarpal arthrodeses using 2.7/3.5 mm hybrid dynamic compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 102-107.
9 Graehler RA, Weigle JP, Pardo AD. The effect of plate type, angle of ilial osteotomy, and degree of axial rotation on the structural anatomy of the pelvis. VetSurg 1994; 23: 13-20.
10 Perren SM, Klaue K, Pohler O. et al. The limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109: 304-310.
11 Taljanovic MS, Jones MD, Ruth JT. et al. Fracture fixation. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 1569-1590.
12 Sistema Pengo de Síntese Jaú: Biomecanica; 2005. [accessed March 10,2005]. Available from: http://www.biomecanica.com.br
13 Piermattei Piermattei, Johnson KA. An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. PA: WB. Saunders Company; 2004: 400.
14 Fox SM, Bray JC, Guerin SR. et al. Antebrachial deformities in the dog: Treatment with external fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 315-320.
15 Augat P, Simon U, Liedert A. et al Mechanics and mechano-biology of fracture healing in normal and osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: S36-S43.
16 Larsson S, Kim W, Caja VL. et al. Effect of early axial dynamization on tibial bone healing: a study in dogs. Clin Orthop 2001; 388: 240-251.
17 Panagiotopoulos E, Fortis AP, Lambiris E. et al. Rigid or sliding plate: A mechanical evaluation of osteotomy fixation in sheep. Clin Orthop 1999; 358: 244-249.
18 Yoneda A. Mechanical properties of an osteosynthesis system with relative stability. [Dissertation]. Ribeirão Preto (SP); School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil: 2006
19 McKee MD, Seiler JG, Jupiter JB. The application of the limited contact dynamic compression plate in the upper extremity: an analysis of 114 consecutive cases. Injury 1995; 10: 661-666.
20 Leung F, Chow SP. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the limited contact dynamic compression plate with the point contact fixator for forearm fractures. JBone Joint SurgAm 2003; 85: 2343-2348.
21 Emmerson Emmerson, Muir P. Bone plate removal in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 74-77.