Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22(01): 63-65
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-08-01-0002
Case Report
Schattauer GmbH

Surgical removal of a microchip from a puppy’s spinal canal

T. J. Smith
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
N. Fitzpatrick
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Eashing, Surrey, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 January 2008

Accepted: 01 March 2008

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

A 1.6 kg, six-week-old Tibetan Terrier was admitted with a 12-hours history of acute onset of progressive tetraparesis following insertion of a microchip to the dorsal cervical region. Neurological examination indicated a lesion to the Ce1 to Ce5 spinal cord segments. Radiographic examination confirmed the intra-spinal location of a microchip foreign body at the level of the second cervical vertebra. Microchip removal was achieved following dorsal hemi-laminectomy; significant intra-operative haemorrhage was encountered. The puppy was ambulatory at day seven. Follow-up telephone interview 18 months postoperatively confirmed that the patient had made a good recovery although it had a mild residual right- sided torticollis.

Keywords

Microchip - foreign body - spine - cervical - hemi-laminectomy
 

  • References

  • 1 Fooks AR, McElhinney LM, Brookes SM. et al. Rabies antibody testing and the UK pet travel scheme. Vet Rec 2002; 150: 428-430.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Microchip Advisory Group, UK www.bsava store.com. Last accessed 05.06.08
    PubMed
  • 3 Sorensen MA, Buss MS, Tyler JW. Accuracy of microchip identification in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 766-767.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Platt S, Wieczorek L, Dennis R. et al. Spinal cord injury from incorrect microchip placement in a cat. J Fel Med Surg 2007; 9: 157-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Funkquist B. Decompression laminectomy for cervical disk protrusion in the dog. Acta Vet Scand 1962; 3: 88-101.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Elcock LE, Stuart BP, Wahle BS. et al. Tumours in long-term rat studies associated with microchip animal identification devices. Exp Toxicol Path-ol 2001; 52: 483-491.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tillmann T, Kamino K, Dasenbrock C. et al. Sub-cutaneous soft tissue tumours at the site of the implanted microchips in mice. Exp Toxicol Path-ol 1997; 49: 197-200.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Blanchard KT, Barthel C, French JE. et al. Transponder-induced sarcoma in the heterozygous p53 +/- mouse. Toxicol Pathol 1999; 27: 519-527.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vascellari M, Mutinelli F, Cossettini R. et al. Liposarcoma at the site of an implanted microchip in a dog. Vet J 2004; 168: 188-190.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Trees AJ. Death from a Grass Seed. Vet Rec 1970; October 450
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brockman DJ, Trout NJ. Epidural migration of a suspected pharyngeal foreign body in a dog. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 210-211.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rayward RM. Acute onset quadriparesis as a sequela to an oropharyngeal stick injury. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 295-298.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Leskovar A, Coates JR, Russell KE. et al. Surgical removal of an intramedullary spinal cord foreign body granuloma in a dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 306-310.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Young B, Klopp L, Albrecht M. et al. Imaging diagnosis: Magnetic resonance imaging of a cervical wooden foreign body in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004; 45: 538-541.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van der Burgt G, Dowles H. Microchip insertion in alpacas. Vet Rec 2007; 10: 204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar