Total hip replacement in three cats: surgical technique, short-term outcome and comparison to femoral head ostectomy

Summary

Objective: To describe the surgical technique and clinical features of total hip replacement (THR) due to hip trauma in cats.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Sample population: Three client-owned cats that underwent THR to treat capital epiphyseal fractures, and five client-owned cats that underwent femoral head ostectomy (FHO).

Methods: The clinical data included signalment, body weight, body condition score, diagnosis, implant size, surgical technique, intraoperative observations, and postoperative complications. Radiographic evaluation included implant positioning, cement mantle quality, and follow-up examination of the cement-bone interfaces. Orthopaedic examinations and client interviews were used to evaluate limb function.

Results: The three cats that underwent THR had a mean body weight of 5.5 kg, a mean body condition score of 6/9, and a mean age of three years at the time of surgery. The average THR follow-up was 11 months. For the five cats that underwent FHO, the mean body weight was 6.3 kg, mean body score was 7/9, and mean age at the time of FHO was 2.5 years. The average FHO follow-up was 22 months. Hip flexion, hip extension, and thigh girth after THR compared favourably to similar measurements made after FHO. The functional outcomes after THR were excellent. The functional outcomes after FHO ranged from poor to excellent.

Conclusion and clinical relevance: The recovery after THR was excellent based on clinical assessment of muscle mass, hip joint passive range of motion, gait, and owner assessment. Further blinded, randomised, and controlled trials of THR in cats are warranted.

Keywords

Cat - hip joint - total hip replacement - femoral head ostectomy

• References

• 1 Hardie EM, Roe SC, Martin FR. Radiographic evidence of degenerative joint disease in geriatric cats: 100 cases (1994–1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 628-632.
• 2 Fischer HR, Norton J, Kobluk CN. et al Surgical reduction and stabilization for repair of femoral capital phy-seal fractures in cats: 13 cases (1998–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 224: 1478-1482.
• 3 Kawamata T, Niiyama M, Taniyama H. Open reduction and stabilisation of coxofemoral joint luxation in dogs and cats, using a stainless steel rope inserted via a ventral approach to the hip joint. Aust Vet J 1996; 74: 460-464.
• 4 Parton K, Balmer TV, Boyle J. et al The pharmacokinetics and effects of intravenously administered carprofen and salicylate on gastrointestinal mucosa and selected biochemical measurements in healthy cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2000; 23: 73-79.
• 5 Gendreau C, Cawley AJ. Excision of the femoral head and neck: the long term results of 35 operations. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 605-608.
• 6 Eingartner C. Current trends in total hip arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007; 9: 8-14.
• 7 Olmstead ML. Canine cemented total hip replacements: state of the art. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 395-399.
• 8 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung BA, Doyens DH. et al Canine uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty: results of a long-term prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 10-20.
• 9 Anderson I G, Hearn T, Taves C. Force plate gait analysis in normal and dysplastic dogs before and after total hip replacement surgery: an experimental study. Vet Surg 1988; 17: 27
• 10 Dogan S, Manley PA, Vanderby Jr. R. et al Canine inter-segmental hip joint forces and moments before and after cemented total hip replacement. J Biomech 1991; 24: 397-407.
• 11 Budsberg SC, Chambers JN, Lue SL. et al Prospective evaluation of ground reaction forces in dogs undergoing unilateral total hip replacement. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1781-1785.
• 12 Warnock JJ, Dyce J, Pooya H. et al Retrospective analysis of canine miniature total hip prostheses. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 285-291.
• 13 Nunamaker DM. Textbook of small animal orthopaedics In: Newton CD, Nunamaker DM, editors. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company 1985; 555-560.
• 14 Laflamme D. Development and Validation of a Body Condition Score System for Cats: A Clinical Tool. Feline Pract 1997; 25: 13-18.
• 15 Brown SG, Rosen H. Craniolateral approach to the canine hip: a modified Watson-Jones approach. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1971; 159: 1117-1122.
• 16 Olmstead ML. The canine cemented modular total hip prosthesis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1995; 31: 109-124.
• 17 Jaeger GH, Marcellin-Little DJ, Depuy V. et al Validity of goniometric joint measurements in cats. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 822-826.
• 18 Levine D, Millis DL, Marcellin-Little DJ. Introduction to veterinary physical rehabilitation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2005; 35: 1247-1254.
• 19 Dunne NJ, Orr JF. Flow characteristics of curing polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1998; 212: 199-207.
• 20 Cameron HU. Cemented Femoral Fixation: Thin Mantles, The French Paradox. Sem Arthroplasty 2008; 19: 144-147.
• 21 Liska WD. Femur fractures associated with canine total hip replacement. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 164-172.
• 22 Lidgren L, Robertson O. Acrylic bone cements: clinical developments and current status: Scandinavia. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 55-61.
• 23 Lucksanasombool P, Higgs WA, Ignat M. et al Comparison of failure characteristics of a range of cancellous bone-bone cement composites. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 64: 93-104.
• 24 Little JP, Gray HA, Murray DW. et al Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 454-458.
• 25 Massat BJ, Vasseur PB. Clinical and radiographic results of total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 96 cases (1986–1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205: 448-454.
• 26 Andrews CM, Liska WD, Roberts DJ. Sciatic neurapraxia as a complication in 1000 consecutive canine total hip replacements. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 254-262.
• 27 Freeman CB, Adin CA, Lewis DD. et al Intrapelvic granuloma formation six years after total hip arthroplasty in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 1446-1449. 1433
• 28 Edwards MR, Egger EL, Schwarz PD. Aseptic loosening of the femoral implant after cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 11 cases in 10 dogs (1991–1995). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 580-586.
• 29 Frankel DJ, Pluhar GE, Skurla CP. et al Radiographic evaluation of mechanically tested cemented total hip arthroplasty femoral components retrieved postmortem. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 216-224.
• 30 Duff R, Campbell JR. Long term results of excision arthroplasty of the canine hip. Vet Rec 1977; 101: 181-184.
• 31 Smith GK, Langenbach A, Green PA. et al Evaluation of the association between medial patellar luxation and hip dysplasia in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 40-45.
• 32 Duff R, Campbell JR. Effects of experimental excision arthroplasty of the hip joint. Res Vet Sci 1978; 24: 174-181.
• 33 Mann FA, Tangner CH, Wagner-Mann C. et al A comparison of standard femoral head and neck excision and femoral head and neck excision using a biceps femoris muscle flap in the dog. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 223-230.
• 34 Rawson EA, Aronsohn MG, Burk RL. Simultaneous bilateral femoral head and neck ostectomy for the treatment of canine hip dysplasia. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2005; 41: 166-170.
• 35 Lascelles BD, Findley K, Correa M. et al Kinetic evaluation of normal walking and jumping in cats, using a pressure-sensitive walkway. Vet Rec 2007; 160: 512-516.
• 36 Planté J, Dupuis J, Beauregard G. et al Long-term results of conservative treatment, excision arthroplasty and triple pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia in the immature dog. Part 2: Analysis of the ground reaction forces. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 130-135.