Delayed spinal cord injury following microchip placement in a dog

Summary

A three-year-old female, entire Yorkshire Terrier dog was examined because it had progressive non-weight-bearing left forelimb lameness and tetraparesis of two weeks duration. Clinical signs were first observed following mating. Examination confirmed non-weight-bearing left forelimb lameness and tetraparesis. Left forelimb muscle atrophy was also noticed. Survey radiography revealed a metallic foreign body consistent with a microchip in close proximity to the left articular facets between the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae. Computed tomography identified the exact location of the foreign body encroaching on the left dorsolateral vertebral canal, and osteolysis of the lamina of the sixth cervical vertebra. Surgical removal of the foreign body was performed via a dorsal approach to the caudal cervical vertebral column. Two weeks following surgery the dog showed return of left forelimb function and resolving tetraparesis. Microchip implantation had been performed three years previously.

Keywords

Microchip - spinal cord - aseptic - osteolysis - computed tomography

• References

• 1 Sorensen MA, Buss MS, Tyler JW. Accuracy of microchip identification in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 766-767.
• 2 ICAR: International Committee for Animal Recording. List of manufacture codes. International Committee for Animal Recording [document on internet]. [Updated 2009 August 6; Cited on 2009 September 14.] Available from: http://www.ser vice-icar.com/manufacturer_codes/Manufacturers_DB/manufacturer_codes_main.asp.
• 3 Murasugi E, Koie H, Okano M. et al. Histological reactions to microchip implants in dogs. Vet Rec 2003; 153: 328-330.
• 4 Swift S. Microchip adverse reactions. J Small Anim Prac 2000; 41: 232
• 5 Vascellari M, Mutinelli F, Cossettini R. et al. Liposarcoma at the site of an implanted microchip in a dog. Vet J 2004; 168: 188-190.
• 6 Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Mutinelli F. Fibrosarcoma with typical features of postinjection sarcoma at site of microchip implant in a dog: histologic and immunohistochemical study. Vet Pathol 2006; 43: 545-548.
• 7 Platt S, Wieczorek L, Dennis R. et al. Spinal cord injury resulting from incorrect microchip placement in a cat. J Feline Med Surg 2007; 9: 157-160.
• 8 Daly MK, Saba CF, Crochik SS. et al. Fibrosarcoma adjacent to the site of microchip implantation in a cat. J Feline Med Surg 2008; 10: 202-205.
• 9 Hicks DG, Bagley RS. Imaging diagnosis – spinal injury following aberrant microchip implantation. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008; 49: 152-153.
• 10 Smith TJ, Fitzpatrick N. Surgical removal of a microchip from a puppy's spinal canal. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 63-65.
• 11 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. editors, An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat Saunders; Philadelphia: 2004
• 12 Nind F. Microchip Report 2004. Microchip Advisory Group: British Small Animal Veterinary Association. [cited 2009 September 25] Available from: http://www.noble-leon.com/documents/BSAVA-2004MicrochipReport.pdf.
• 13 Jansen JA, van der Waerden JPCM, Gwalter RH. et al. Biological and migrational characteristics of transponders implanted into beagle dogs. Vet Rec 1999; 145: 329-333.
• 14 Kalender W, Khadivi KO. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Weinheim, Germany; 2006; 33: 3076
• 15 Frendin J, Funkquist B, Hansson K. et al. Diagnostic imaging of foreign body reactions in dogs with diffuse back pain. J Small Anim Prac 1999; 40: 278-285.
• 16 Naughton JF, Tucker RL, Bagley RS. Radiographic diagnosis: Paraspinal abscess in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46: 23-26.
• 17 Stefani AD, Garosi LS, McConnell FJ. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of spinal epidural empyema in five dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008; 49: 135-140.
• 18 Zhang HY, Blunt L, Jiang XQ. et al. Femoral stem wear in cemented total hip replacement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine (ISSN 0954-4119) 2008; 222: 583-592.
• 19 Amstutz HC, Campbell P, Kossovsky N. et al. Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 276: 7-18.
• 20 Microchip Advisory Group. Microchip Implant Manual, Cats / Dogs, Spring 2006 [document on internet]. British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2006 [cited 2009 September 14] Available from: http://www.bsava.com/Advice/MicrochipAdvice/tabid/154/Default.aspx