Comparison of four commercial devices to measure limb circumference in dogs

Summary

We evaluated four measurement devices for obtaining circumferential measurements at four locations on the canine hindlimb and forelimb. We hypothesised that these devices would be consistent and precise in the hands of veterinary professionals with varying experience levels. Circumferential measurements were made in five dogs with no history or clinical evidence of orthopaedic disease. Measurements were obtained in triplicate by three observers at mid-thigh, tibial tuberosity, hock and carpus bilaterally. Results indicated a significantly larger measurement at the left mid-thigh region than the right, with no significant differences between limbs noted at other sites. Measurements with a tape measure and a retractable tape measure resulted in significantly smaller values at each site than an ergonomic measuring tape and a circumference measuring tape. Interobserver variation was 3.6 times higher than intraob-server variation. These results illustrate the importance of consistency when obtaining these measurements. Sequential circumference measurements should be made by the same individual using the same device to decrease measurement variability. Devices were equally precise for repeat measurements although the absolute measurement varied by device.

Keywords

Muscle mass - limb circumference - physical therapy

• References

• 1 Millis DL, Levine D. The role of exercise and physical modalities in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997; 27: 913-930.
• 2 Millis DL. Assessing and measuring outcomes. In: Millis DL, Levine D, Taylor RA, editors. Canine Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy. St. Louis: Saunders; 2004: gs 211-227.
• 3 Hoelzler MG, Millis DL, Francis DA. et al. Results of arthroscopic versus open arthrotomy for surgical management of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 146-153.
• 4 Monk ML, Preston CA, McGowan CM. Effects of early intensive postoperative physiotherapy on limb function after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with deficiency of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 529-536.
• 5 Doxey GE. The association of anthropometric measurements of thigh size and B-mode ultra-sound scanning of muscle thickness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987; 08: 462-468.
• 6 Harari J, Johnson AL, Stein LE. et al. Evaluation of experimental transaction and partial excision of the caudal cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 151-154.
• 7 Anson LW, DeYoung DJ, Richardson DC. et al. Clinical evaluation of canine acetabular fractures stabilized with an acetabular plate. Vet Surg 1988; 17: 220-225.
• 8 Beckham HP, Smith MM, Kern DA. Use of a modified toggle pin for repair of coxofemoral luxation in dogs with multiple orthopedic injuries: 14 cases (1986–1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 208: 81-84.
• 9 Johnson JM, Johnson AL, Pijanowski GJ. et al. Rehabilitation of dogs with surgically treated cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles by use of electrical stimulation of muscles. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1473-1478.
• 10 Bruce WJ. Multiple ligamentous injuries of the canine stifle joint: a study of 12 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 333-340.
• 11 Jerram RM, Walker AM, Warman CGA. Proximal tibial intraarticular ostectomy for treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament injury. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 196-205.
• 12 Lauer S, Hosgood G, Ramirez S. et al. In vivo comparison of two hinged transarticular external skeletal fixators for multiple ligamentous injuries of the canine stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 25-35.
• 13 Allen MJ, Leone KA, Lamonte K. et al. Cemented total knee replacement in 24 dogs: surgical technique, clinical results, and complications. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 555-567.
• 14 Moeller EM, Allen DA, Wilson ER. et al. Long-term outcomes of thigh circumference, stifle range-of-motion, and lameness after unilateral tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Tramatol 2010; 23: 37-42.
• 15 Rexing J, Dunning D, Siegel AM. et al. Effects of cold compression, bandaging, and microcurrent electrical therapy after cranial cruciate ligament repair in dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 54-58.
• 16 Unis MD, Roush JK, Bilicki KL. et al. Effect of band-aging on postoperative swelling after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 240-244.
• 17 Nicholas JJ, Taylor FH, Buckingham RB. et al. Measurement of circumference of the knee with ordinary tape measure. Ann Rheum Dis 1976; 35: 282-284.
• 18 Ross M, Worrell TW. Thigh and calf girth following knee injury and surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 9-15.
• 19 Bérard A, Kurz X, Zuccarelli F. et al. Reliability study of the Leg-O-Meter, an improved tape measure device, in patients with chronic venous insufficiency of the leg. Angiology 1998; 49: 169-173.
• 20 Järvelä T, Kannus P, Latvala K. et al. Simple measurements in assessing muscle performance after an ACL reconstruction. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23: 196-201.
• 21 Cheong JL, Hunt RW, Anderson PJ. et al. Head growth in preterm infants: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging and neurodevelopmental outcome. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e1534-1540.
• 22 Martin AD, Spenst LF, Drinkwater DT. et al. Anthropometric estimation of muscle mass in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 729-733.
• 23 Soderberg GL, Ballantyne BT, Kestel LL. Reliability of lower extremity girth measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physiother Res Int 1996; 01: 7-16.
• 24 Labs K, Tschoepl M, Gamba G. et al. The reliability of leg circumference assessment: a comparison of spring tape measurements and optoelectronic volumetry. Vasc Med 2000; 5: 69-74.
• 25 Tunc R, Caglayan-Tunc A, Kisakol G. et al. Intraob-server and interobserver agreements of leg circumference measurements by tape measure based on 3 reference points. Angiology 2007; 58: 593-596.
• 26 Geil MD. Consistency and accuracy of measurement of lower-limb amputee anthropometrics. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 131-140.
• 27 Bérard A, Zuccarelli F. Test-retest reliability study of a new improved Leg-O-Meter, the Leg-O-Meter II, in patients suffering from venous insufficiency of the lower limbs. Angiology 2000; 51: 711-717.
• 28 Bérard A, Kurz X, Zuccarelli F. et al. Validity of the Leg-O-Meter, an instrument to measure leg circumference. Angiology 2002; 53: 21-28.
• 29 Wells DL. Lateralised behaviour in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. Behav Processes 2003; 61: 27-35.
• 30 Colborne GR. Are sound dogs mechanically symmetric at trot?. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 294-301.
• 31 Millis DL, Scroggs L, Levine D. Variables affecting thigh circumference measurements in dogs. Proceedings of The First International Symposium on Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. 1999 Jan 1; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. pg. 157.
• 32 Jevens DJ, Hauptman JG, DeCamp CE. et al. Contributions to variance in force-plate analysis of gait in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 612-615.
• 33 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 471-478.
• 34 Bartram JL, Rigby AS, Baxter PS. The “Lasso-o” tape: stretchability and observer variability in head circumference measurement. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 820-821.
• 35 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 08: 135-160.