Evaluation of intra-articular and subcutaneous administration of meloxicam for postoperative analgesia following stifle surgery in dogs

Summary

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of meloxicam when given by intra-articular (IA) and subcutaneous (SC) routes of administration for postoperative analgesia versus a placebo for dogs undergoing stifle surgery. Twenty-five dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups, each with nine dogs, before surgical repair of twenty-seven stifles using a modified lateral retinacular imbrication technique. Group 1 dogs received IA administration of meloxicam and SC placebo. Group 2 dogs received IA placebo and SC meloxicam. Group 3 dogs received IA and SC administration of placebo. Dogs were assessed for pain by blinded observers using a visual analog scale (VAS), a numerical pain scoring system (NPS), and measurement of pain threshold using an algometer applied to the affected stifle. Assessments were made prior to pre-medication, postoperatively at the time of extubation, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours following extubation. The results did not identify any significant effect of treatment between groups on the VAS data, algometer readings, or NPS data. Significantly increased VAS scores and decreased algometer readings were noted from preoperative to postoperative times. No differences were noted in early postoperative pain between dogs treated with IA meloxicam, SC meloxicam, or placebo.

While intra-articular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration has shown efficacy in joint surgery for people, we did not find any evidence to support its use in dogs undergoing repair of CCLR.

Keywords

Meloxicam - intra-articular - NSAID - nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs - analgesia

• References

• 1 Hansen B. Acute pain management. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30: 899-916.
• 2 Lemke KA. Understanding the pathophysiology of perioperative pain. Can Vet J 2004; 45: 405-413.
• 3 Romsing J, Moiniche S, Ostergaard D. et al. Local infiltration with NSAIDs for postoperative analgesia: Evidence for a peripheral analgesic action. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 672-83.
• 4 Unlu Z, Ay K, Tuzun C. Comparison of intra-articular tenoxicam and oral tenoxicam for pain and physical functioning in osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Rheumatol 2006; 25: 54-61.
• 5 Sammarco JL, Conzemius MG, Perkowski SZ. et al. Postoperative analgesia for stifle surgery: A comparison of intra-articular bupivacaine, morphine, or saline. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 59-69.
• 6 Day TK, Pepper WT, Tobias TA. et al. Comparison of intra-articular and epidural morphine for analgesia following stifle arthrotomy in dogs. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 522-530.
• 7 Suominen MM, Tulamo RM, Anttila MO. et al. Effects of intra-articular injections of bufexamac suspension in healthy horses. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1629-1635.
• 8 Alagol A, Calpur OU, Usar PS. et al. Intraarticular analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery: Comparison of neostigmine, clonidine, tenoxicam, morphine and bupivacaine. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13: 658-663.
• 9 Colbert ST, Curran E, O'Hanlon DM. et al. Intra-articular tenoxicam improves postoperative analgesia in knee arthroscopy. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 653-657.
• 10 Guler G, Karaoglu S, Velibasoglu H. et al. Comparison of analgesic effects of intra-articular tenoxicam and morphine in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002; 10: 229-232.
• 11 Izdes S, Orhun S, Turanli S. et al. The effects of preoperative inflammation on the analgesic efficacy of intraarticular piroxicam for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1016-1019.
• 12 Gogny M. Pharmacological profile and therapeutic value of meloxicam. In: Bennett D. editor Recent Advances in Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Small Animals Paris: Paris. BoehringerIngelheim; 1999: 35-40.
• 13 Curry SL, Cogar SM, Cook JL. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2005; 41: 298-309.
• 14 Mathews KA, Pettifer G, Foster R. et al. Safety and efficacy of preoperative administration of meloxicam, compared with that of ketoprofen and butorphanol in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 882-888.
• 15 Budsberg SC, Cross AR, Quandt JE. et al. Evaluation of intravenous administration of meloxicam for perioperative pain management following stifle joint surgery in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 1557-1563.
• 16 Laredo FG, Belda E, Murciano J. et al. Comparison of the analgesic effects of meloxicam and carprofen administered preoperatively to dogs undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Vet Rec 2004; 155: 667-671.
• 17 Van Bree H, Justus C, Quirke JF. Preliminary observations on the effects of meloxicam in a new model for acute intra-articular inflammation in dogs. Vet Res Commun 1994; 18: 217-224.
• 18 Littell RC, Milliken GE, Stroup WW. et al. Ch. 3: Analysis of repeated measures data. In: SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1996: 87-134.
• 19 Pascoe PJ. Opioid analgesics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30: 757-772.
• 20 Firth AM, Haldane SL. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 651-659.
• 21 Holton LL, Scott EM, Nolan AM. et al. Comparison of three methods used for assessment of pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212: 61-66.
• 22 Fowler D, Isakow K, Caulkett N. et al. An evaluation of the analgesic effects of meloxicam in addition to epidural morphine/mepivacaine in dogs undergoing cranial cruciate ligament repair. Can Vet J 2003; 44: 643-648.
• 23 Mathews KA. Pain assessment and general approach to management. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30: 729-755.
• 24 Lemke KA, Runyon CL, Horney BS. Effects of preoperative administration of ketoprofen on anesthetic requirements and signs of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1268-1275.
• 25 Holton LL, Scott EM, Nolan AM. et al. Relationship between physiological factors and clinical pain in dogs scored using a numerical rating scale. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 469-474.
• 26 Brandt KD. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and articular cartilage. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 132-133.
• 27 Rainsford KD, Skerry TM, Chindemi P. et al. Effects of the NSAIDs meloxicam and indomethacin on cartilage proteoglycan synthesis and joint responses to calcium pyrophosphate crystals in dogs. Vet Res Commun 1999; 23: 101-113.
• 28 Elhakim M, Fathy A, Elkott M. et al. Intra-articular tenoxicam relieves post-arthroscopy pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 1223-1226.