Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25(03): 250-261
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-06-0082
Reprinted Publication
Schattauer GmbH

Computerized measurements of radiographic anatomical parameters of the elbow joint in Bernese Mountain Dogs

S. Stein
1   Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK
,
H. G. Schmoekel
2   Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
H. Waibl
3   Department of Anatomy, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany
,
L. Brunnberg
4   Small Animal Hospital of the Free University Berlin, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 05 June 2011

Accepted 11 March 2011

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: Comparison of two methods for evaluation of anatomical parameters of elbow joints in Bernese Mountain Dogs.

Study design: Radiographic analysis.

Animals: Nine hundred and thirty-one radiographs of elbow joints from 305 Bernese Mountain Dogs.

Material and methods: The angles OL, PA, RA and UL were measured according to the Mues method and the Radius of the humeral condyle, Opening angle beta, Quotient Q and Ae, Area X, Step 1 and Step 2 according to the Viehmann method. The radiographs were divided according to their angle of flexion into five groups: 0–30°, 31–60°, 61–90°, 91–120° and >120°. The difference and the correlation between measured values and the elbow dysplasia (ED) score was calculated and compared.

Results: The average values of angle OL, PA and RA, Area X, Step 1 and Step 2 were significantly different within the different elbow flexion angle groups. The values of Opening angle beta, Quotients Q and Ae as well as Radius of the humeral condyle varied independently from the degree of the elbow flexion on the radiograph. The angles OL, PA and RA and the Radius of the humeral condyle, the Opening angle beta, the Quotients Q and Ae, Step 1 and Step 2 correlated with the ED score.

Conclusion: In contrast to the method of Mues, the majority of the measured parameters of the method of Viehmann were not influenced by the degree of flexion of the elbow joint and correlated with the ED score. Clinical relevance: The method of Viehmann warrants consideration for the evaluation of radiographs of elbow joints in the Bernese Mountain Dog for ED.

This article is based on a study first reported in S. Stein's doctoral thesis, which was presented on 08.05.2007 and published thereafter in full by Mensch & Buch Verlag. This abridged and translated version is now being published with the kind permission of Mensch & Buch Verlag.

Keywords

Elbow dysplasia - radiographs - Bernese Mountain Dog - breeding selection
 

  • References

  • 1 Audell L. Incidence of elbow arthrosis in dogs in Sweden. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual meeting of the International Elbow Working Group. 1990. March 29 San Francisco, California, USA.:
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Guthrie S, Pidduck HG. Heritability of elbow osteochondrosis within a closed population of dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31: 93-96.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Swenson L, Audell L, Hedhammar A. Prevalence and inheritance of and selection for elbow arthrosis in Bernese Moutain Dogs and Rottweilers in Sweden and benefit: Cost analysis of a screening and control program. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 210: 215-221.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wind AP, Packard ME. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: Part 1. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 712-724.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wind AP, Packard ME. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: Part 2. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 725-730.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Janutta V, Distl O. Review on canine elbow dysplasia: pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevalence and genetic aspects. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2008; 115: 172-181.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schleich S. Ellenbogengelenk. Teil 1: Fragmentierter Processus coronoideus medialis ulnae [Elbow joint. Part I: Fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna]. Kleintier Konkret 1998; 6: 21-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schleich S. Ellenbogengelenk. Teil 2: Fragmentierter Processus coronoideus medialis ulnae: Primäre röntgenologische Veränderungen [Elbow joint. Part II: Fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna: Primary radiographic changes]. Kleintier Konkret 1998; 2: 34-38.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zontine WJ, Weitkamp RA, Lippincott L. Redefined type of elbow dysplasia involving calcified flexor tendons attached to the medial humeral epicondyle in three dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1082-1085.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Marcellin-Little DJ. Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in dogs. In: Bonagura JD, Kirk RW. editors. Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XIII. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1999. pg. 1000-1004.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Carrera I, Hammond GJ, Sullivan M. Computed tomographic features of incomplete ossification of the canine humeral condyle. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 226-231.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 IEWG: The International Elbow Working Group. 2001 International Elbow protocol (Vancouver). Homepage: www.iewg-vet.org und www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/iewg.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mues C. Charakterisierung und Vererbung des Arthroserisikos der Ellenbogen-gelenksdysplasie (ED) beim Hund [Characterization and inheritance of osteoarthritis in the elbow - elbow dysplasia in dogs]. Vet Med [dissertation]. Gießen: Justus Liebig University Giessen, Department of Veterinary Medicine; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Brunnberg L, Viehmann B, Waibl H. Computergestützte Auswertung von Röntgenbildern zur Erfassung von Parametern der Ellenbogengelenksdysplasie - Teil 1: Incisura trochlearis ulnae [Computer-assisted analysis of radiographs to collect parameters for elbow dysplasia - Part I: Trochlear notch of the ulna]. Kleintierpraxis 1999; 44: 595-606.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brunnberg L, Viehmann B, Waibl H. Computergestützte Auswertung von Röntgenbildern zur Erfassung von Parametern der Ellenbogengelenksdysplasie - Teil 2: Stufenbildungen im Gelenk [Computer-assisted analysis of radiographs to collect parameters for elbow dysplasia - Part II: Step build-up in the joint]. Kleintierpraxis 1999; 44: 637-646.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bennett D, Duff SR, Kene RO. et al. Osteochondritis dissecans and fragmentation of the coronoid process in the elbow joint of the dog. Vet Rec 1981; 109: 329-336.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cook CR, Cook JL. Diagnostic imaging of canine elbow dysplasia: a review. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 144-153.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lappalainen AK, Molsa S, Liman A. et al. Radiographic and computed tomography findings in Belgian Shepherd Dogs with mild elbow dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 364-369.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Berzon JL, Quick CB. Fragmented coronoid process: Anatomical, clinical, and radiographic considerations with case analysis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1980; 16: 241-251.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Carpenter LG, Schwarz PD, Lowry JE. et al. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 78-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schwarz T, Johnson VS, Voute L. Bone scintigraphy in the investigation of occult lameness in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 232-237.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Genmill TJ, Mellor DJ, Clements DN. et al. Evaluation of elbow incongruency using reconstructed CT in dogs suffering fragmented coronoid process. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 327-333.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Holsworth IG, Wisner ER, Scherrer WE. et al. Accuracy of computerized tomographic evaluation of canine radio-ulnar incongruence in vitro. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 108-113.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moores AP, Benigni L, Lamb CR. Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 390-398.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Snaps FR, Saunders JH, Park RD. Comparison of spin echo, gradient echo and fat saturation magnetic resonance imaging sequences for imaging the canine elbow. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998; 39: 518-523.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Janach KJ, Breit SM, Kuenzel WW. Assessment of the geometry of the cubital (elbow) joint of dogs by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 211-218.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Probst A, Modler F, Kunzel W. et al. Demonstration of the articular cartilage of the canine ulnar trochlear notch using high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Vet J 2008; 177: 63-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Snaps FR, Balligand MH, Saunders JH. Comparison of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in dogs with elbow dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1367-1370.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mason DR, Schulz KS, Samii VF. et al. Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 125-132.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Murphy ST, Lewis DD, Shiroma JT. et al. Effect of radiographic positioning on interpretation of cubital joint incongruity in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1998; 59: 1351-1357.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wagner K, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. Radiographic, computed tomographic, and arthroscopic evaluation of experimental radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 691-698.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Draffan D, Carrera I, Carmichael S. et al. Radiographic analysis of trochlear notch sclerosis in the diagnosis of osetoarthritis secondary to medial coronoid disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 7-15.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Smith TJ, Fitzpatrick N, Evans RB. et al. Measurement of subtrochlear sclerosis using percentage scale in Labrador Retrievers with minimal radiographic signs of periarticular osteophytosis. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 199-208.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Janutta V, Hamann H, Klein S. et al. Genetic evaluation of elbow angles as predictors of elbow dysplasia in German Shepherd Dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 52: 254-261.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Janutta V, Hamann H, Klein S. et al. Genetic classification of three different classification protocols for the evaluation of elbow dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 75-82.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Grøndalen J, Grøndalen T. Arthrosis in the elbow joints of young rapidly growing dogs. V. A pathoanatomical investigation. Nord Vet Med 1981; 33: 1-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schwencke M. Van den Brom WE, Hazewinkel HAW. Morphological measurements for arthrosis risk in elbow dysplasia: A new method?. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 225-231.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Samoy Y, Van Ryssen B, Gielen I. et al. Review of the literature: elbow incongruity in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 1-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kramer AI, Holsworth IG, Wisner ER. et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of canine radioulnar incongruence in vivo. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 24-29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 House MR, Marino DJ, Lesser ML. Effect of limb position on elbow congruity with CT evaluation. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 154-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Boettcher P, Werner H, Ludewig E. et al. Visual estimation of radioulnar incongruence in dogs using three-dimensional image rendering: an in vitro study based on computed tomographic imaging. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 161-168.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tietz E. Über die frühzeitige Erkennung der Coronoidfraktur beim Berner Sennenhund und beim Großen Schweizer Sennenhund. Vet Med [dissertation]. Berlin: Free University of Berlin, Small Animal Hospital; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Morgan JP, Wind A, Davison AP. Hereditarybone and joint diseases in the dog. Hannover: Schlütersche GmbH & Co.KG, Verlag und Druckerei; 2000
    Google Scholar