Comparison of four techniques for synoviocentesis of the equine digital flexor tendon sheath: A cadaveric study

Summary

Objective: To compare four different techniques for synoviocentesis of the equine digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS).

Methods: Fifteen inexperienced operators performed each of the following injection techniques on two cadaveric limbs: Proximal (at the proximal recess of the DFTS), Axial (axial to the proximal sesamoid bone), Base (at the base of the proximal sesamoid bone), and Distal (at the pastern). The number of attempts needed before the needle was assumed to be correctly positioned into the DFTS was recorded and 10 ml of methylene blue was injected. The limbs were dissected to determine the presence of methylene blue in the DFTS, the distance between the needle entrance point and the lateral palmar or plantar (digital) nerve, the degree of subcutaneous leakage and the distance between the border of the leakage zone and the lateral digital nerve.

Results: The Axial (29/30) and Distal (25/30) approaches had the highest numbers of successful injections. The median number of attempts was highest for the Axial approach. The distances from the injection point and from the border of the leakage zone to the lateral digital nerve were longer for Distal and Axial approaches.

Clinical relevance: In the hands of inexperienced operators, the Axial approach was the most successful technique for injection of the equine DFTS. Sparse subcutaneous leakage and larger distance to the nerve when using this technique might decrease the risk of inadvertent palmar or plantar digital nerve desensitisation when performing DFTS analgesia.

Keywords

Digital flexor tendon sheath - synoviocentesis - horse - palmar digital nerve - plantar digital nerve - anaesthesia

• References

• 1 Jackman BR, Baxter GM, Parks AH. et al. The use of indwelling drains in the treatment of septic tenosynovitis. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Convention of American Association of Equine Practitioners. 1989. Dec. 3-6 Boston, Massachusetts, USA: pgs. 251-258.
• 2 Honnas CM, Schumacher J, Cohen ND. et al. Septic tenosynovitis in horses: 25 cases (1983-1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 199: 1616-1622.
• 3 Stashak TS. Examination for lameness. In: Adams' Lameness in Horses. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. pgs. 113-183.
• 4 Bassage LH, Ross MW. Diagnostic analgesia. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ. editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. St Louis: Elsiever Science; 2003. pgs. 93-124.
• 5 Hassel DM, Stover SM, Yarbrough TB. Palmar-plantar axial sesamoidean approach to the digital flexor tendon sheath in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 1343-1347.
• 6 Wright IM, McMahon PJ. Tenosynovitis associated with longitudinal tears of the digital flexor tendons in horses: a report of 20 cases. Equine Vet J 1999; 31: 12-18.
• 7 Dik KJ, Van den Belt AJM, Keg PR. Ultrasonographic evaluation of fetlock annular ligament constriction in the horse. Equine Vet J 1991; 23: 285-288.
• 8 McIlwraith CW. Diseases of joints, tendons, ligaments and related structures. In: Stashak TS. editor. Adams' Lameness in Horses. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. pgs. 459-644.
• 9 Barr ARS, Dyson SJ, Barr FJ. et al. Tendonitis of the deep digital flexor tendon in the distal metacarpal/metatarsal region associated with tenosynovitis of the digital sheath in the horse. Equine Vet J 1995; 27: 348-355.
• 10 Dyson SJ, Denoix JM. Tendon, tendon sheath and ligament injuries in the pastern. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1995; 11: 217-233.
• 11 Gerring EL, Webbon PM. Fetlock annular ligament desmotomy: a report of 24 cases. Equine Vet J 1984; 16: 113-116.
• 12 Schneider RK, Gavin PR, Tucker RL. What magnetic resonance imaging is teaching us about navicular disease. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of American Association of Equine Practitioners. 2003. Nov 21-25 New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: pgs. 210-219.
• 13 Harper J, Schumacher J, DeGraves F. et al. Effects of analgesia of the digital flexor tendon sheath on pain originating in the sole, distal interphalangeal joint or navicular bursa of horses. Equine Vet J 2007; 39: 535-539.
• 14 Misheff MM, Stover SM. A comparison of two techniques for arthocentesis of the equine metacarpo-phalangeal joint. Equine Vet J 1991; 23: 273-276.