Variation of tibial plateau geometry and cruciate ligament coordinates in six breeds of dogs

Summary

Objectives: The first aim of this study was to examine whether or not variations concerning the conformational characteristics of the proximal surface of the tibial plateau exist among six different dog breeds as well as within the same breed. The second aim of this study was to determine the coordinates of the cruciate ligaments.

Methods: One hundred and four tibias of 52 mature dogs from six different breeds were used. Photographs of the proximal surface of tibial plateau were taken, and measurements for the length, width and area of the tibial plateau, and the lateral and medial condyles were taken. In addition, the intercondylar width, height of Gerdy's tubercle, popliteal notch depth, and extensor groove depth were measured and recorded. The quotients from these measurements were calculated and compared amongst the dog breeds. The coordinates of the cruciate ligaments, according to the centre of tibial plateau, were also determined.

Results: Based on the calculated quotients, variations in the geometry of the tibial plateau geometry were common among the breeds. Within the same breed, on the other hand, length and width measurements of the tibial plateau were the least variable parameters among the other parameters examined. The cranial cruciate ligament was located in front of the surface centre of tibial plateau in all breeds. The position of cranial cruciate ligament was more variable in the craniocaudal direction than that observed in the mediolateral direction; this was the exact opposite of caudal cruciate ligament.

Clinical significance: The inter-breed variations of the quotients determined in the present study may facilitate attempts aimed to assess the risk factors of stifle joint injury and to design total knee prostheses.

Keywords

Cruciate ligament coordinates - dog - tibial plateau - variation

• References

• 1 Struben PJ. The tibial plateau. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64: 336-339.
• 2 Singleton WB. Stifle joint surgery in the dog. Can Vet J 1963; 4: 142-150.
• 3 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Proximodistal alignment of the canine patella: Radiographic evaluation and association with medial and lateral patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 201-211.
• 4 Barrett E, Barr F, Owen M. et al. A retrospective study of the MRI findings in 18 dogs with stifle injuries. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 448-455.
• 5 Moles AD, Hill TP, Glyde M. Triple tibial osteotomy for treatment of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint. Surgical findings and postoperative complications in 97 stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 473-478.
• 6 Hulse D, Hyman W, Beale B. et al. Determination of isometric points for placement of a lateral suture in treatment of the cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 163-167.
• 7 Ertelt J, Fehr M. Cranial cruciate ligament repair in dogs with and without meniscal lesions treated by different minimally invasive methods. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 121-126.
• 8 Chase D, Farrell M. Fracture of the lateral trochlear ridge after surgical stabilization of medial patellar luxation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 203-208.
• 9 Woodbridge N, Corr SA, Grierson J. et al. A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy stabilisation using three different plate types. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 445-449.
• 10 Wallace AM, Addison ES, Smith BA. et al. Modification of the cranial closing wedge ostectomy technique for the treatment of canine cruciate disease. Description and comparison with standard technique. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 457-462.
• 11 Gatineau M, Dupuis J, Plante J. et al. Retrospective study of 476 tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures. Rate of subsequent ‘pivot shift’, meniscal tear and other complications. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 333-341.
• 12 Shahar R, Banks-Sills L. Biomechanical analysis of the canine hind limb: calculation of forces during three-legged stance. Vet J 2002; 163: 240-250.
• 13 Rayward RM, Thomson DG, Davis JV. et al. Progression of osteoarthritis following TPLO surgery: A prospective radiographic study of 40 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 92-97.
• 14 Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T. et al. Force plate gait analysis to asses limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 243-249.
• 15 Selmi AL, Padilha Filho JG. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament associated with deformity of the proximal tibia in five dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42: 390-393.
• 16 Reif U, Dejardin LM, Probst CW. et al. Influence of limb positioning and measurement method on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 368-375.
• 17 Osmond CS, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OL. et al. Morphometric assessment of the proximal portion of the tibia in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 136-141.
• 18 Talaat MB, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Combination tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cranial closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles with excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 729-739.
• 19 Inauen R, Koch D, Bass M. et al. Tibial tuberosity conformation as a risk factor for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 16-20.
• 20 Renwick AI, McKee WM, Emmerson TD. et al. Preliminary experiences of the triple tibial osteotomy procedure: Tibial morphology and complications. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 212-221.
• 21 Fitzpatrick N, Johnson J, Hayashi K. et al. Tibial plateau leveling and medial opening crescentic osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs with tibia vara. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 444-453.
• 22 Griffon DJ. A review of the pathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease as a basis for future preventive strategies. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 399-409.
• 23 Bound N, Zakai D, Butterworth SJ. et al. The prevalence of canine patellar luxation in three centres. Clinical features and radiographic evidence of limb deviation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 32-37.
• 24 Boudrieau RJ. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement?. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 1-22.
• 25 Cardoso HFV, Severino RSS. The chronology of epiphyseal union in the hand and foot from dry bone observations. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2010; 20: 737-746.
• 26 Weiss E, DeSilva J, Zipfel B. Radiographic study of metatarsal one basal epiphyseal fusion: A note of caution on age determination. Am J Phys Anthropol 2012; 147: 489-492.
• 27 O’Connor JE, Bogue C, Spence LD, Last J. A method to establish the relationship between chronological age and stage of union from radiographic assessment of epiphyseal fusion at the knee: An Irish population study. J Anat 2008; 212: 198-209.
• 28 Vezzoni A, Bohorquez Vanelli A, Modenato M. et al. Proximal tibial epiphysiodesis to reduce tibial plateau slope in young dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 343-348.
• 29 Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and Clinical Biostatics. Norwalk: AppletonLange; 1994. pg. 48.
• 30 Palmer RH, Ikuta CL, Cadmus JM. Comparison of femoral angulation measurement between radiographs and anatomic specimens across a broad range of varus conformations. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 1023-1028.
• 31 Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: An in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286.
• 32 Vasseur PB, Arnoczky SP. Collateral ligaments of the canine stifle joint: Anatomic and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res 1981; 42: 1133-1137.
• 33 De Rooster H, De Bruin T, Van Bree H. Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 769-780.
• 34 Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B. et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2724-2734.
• 35 Katsuhara T, Sakaguchi J, Hirokawa S. A 3D Model Analysis for Developing Multifunctional Knee Prosthesis. IFMBE Proceedings 2007; 14: 3177-3181.
• 36 Allen MJ, Leone KA, Lamonte K. et al. Cemented total knee replacement in 24 dogs: Surgical technique, clinical results and complications. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 555-567.
• 37 Reif U, Hulse DA, Hauptman JG. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on stability of the canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joint. An in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 147-154.
• 38 Kim SE, Pozzi A, Banks SA. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on femorotibial contact mechanics and stifle kinematics. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 23-32.
• 39 Kim SE, Pozzi A, Banks SA. et al. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on femorotibial contact mechanics and stifle kinematics. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 33-39.
• 40 Weigel JP, Arnold G, Hicks DA. et al. Biomechanics of rehabilitation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2005; 35: 1255-1285.
• 41 Guerrero TG, Geyer H, Hassig M. et al. Effect of conformation of the distal portion of the femur and proximal portion of the tibia on the pathogenesis of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 1332-1337.
• 42 Burns CG, Boudrieau RJ. Modified tibial tuberosity advancement procedure with tuberosity advancement in excess of 12 mm in four large breed dogs with cranial cruciate-deficient joints. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 250-255.
• 43 Kipfer NM, Tepic S, Damur DM. et al. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on femorotibial shear in cranial cruciate-deficient stifles. An in vitro study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 385-390.
• 44 Kergosien DH, Barnhart MD, Kees CE. et al. Radiographic and clinical changes of the tibial tuberosity after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 468-474.
• 45 Shaibani A, Workman R, Rothschild BM. The significance of enthesopathy as a skeletal phenomenon. Clinical Exp Rheumatol 1993; 11: 399-403.
• 46 Uhorchak JM, Scoville CR, Williams GN. et al. Risk factors associated with noncontact injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective four-year evaluation of 859 West Point cadets. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 831-842.
• 47 Kaplan EB. The iliotibial tract: Clinical and morphological significance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40: 817-832.
• 48 Birnbaum K, Siebert CH, Pandorf T. et al. Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract. Surg Radiol Anat 2004; 26: 433-446.
• 49 Stijak L, Sladojevic M, Nikolic V. et al. Topographic localization of insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament. Acta Chir Jugosl 2010; 57: 121-124.
• 50 Imran A, O’Connor JJ. Theoretical estimates of cruciate ligament forces: Effects of tibial surface geometry and ligament orientation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1997; 211: 425-439.
• 51 Liu W, Maitland ME. Influence of anthropometric and mechanical variations on functional instability in the ACL-deficient knee. Ann Biomed Eng 2003; 31: 1153-1161.
• 52 Winkels P, Werner H, Grevel V. et al. Development and in situ application of an adjustable aiming device to guide extra- to intraarticular tibial tunnel drilling for the insertion of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 324-333.
• 53 Liska WD, Doyle ND. Canine total knee replacement: Surgical technique and one-year outcome. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 568-582.