Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(05): 399-407
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-05-0063
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Feline pantarsal arthrodesis using pre-contoured dorsal plates applied according to the principles of percutaneous plate arthrodesis

N. Fitzpatrick
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK
,
D. Sajik
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK
,
M. Farrell
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 14 May 2012

Accepted 11 March 2013

Publication Date:
23 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To describe the surgical technique for pantarsal arthrodesis (PTA) in cats according to the principles of percutaneous plate arthrodesis with application of a pre-contoured dorsal plate, without external coaptation and to report the long-term clinical outcome.

Materials and methods: Retrospective review was performed of all cats treated by percutaneous plate application using a new pre-contoured dorsal plate for PTA between 2008 and 2011. Inclusion criteria were clinical and radiographic records plus clinical follow-up to at least six weeks. Data recorded included signalment, indication for surgery, postoperative care, and complications encountered. Radiographs were assessed for arthrodesis progression and complications. Outcome was assessed using an owner questionnaire.

Results: Eleven cats were treated for tarsal injuries and met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 86 ± 45 months, weight 4.50 ± 0.92 kg. The only major short-term complication encountered was wound dehiscence requiring sedation and re-suturing. In the medium-term (23.3 months ± 11.6 months) eight out of nine cats returned to normal activity and one cat showed intermittent lameness. Long-term (34.3 months ±17.5 months) radiographic evaluation was performed in seven out of nine cats; six manifested complete arthrodesis and one sustained plate breakage. Based on owner questionnaire, all nine cats returned to normal activity in the long-term, even the case with plate breakage.

Conclusion: Based on our results, PTA using a custom pre-contoured dorsal plate is a suitable salvage surgery for treatment of severe tarsal injuries in cats.

Keywords

Feline - pantarsal arthrodesis - percutaneous - dorsal plate

 

  • References

  • 1 Hunter K, Schawalder P, Schmökel HG. Talocalcaneal luxation combined with lateral instability of the talocrural joint in a dog and a cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 53-56.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Corr S. Management of distal limb shearing injuries in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 747-757.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Diamond D, Besso J, Boudrieau R. Evaluation of joint stabilisation for treatment of shearing injures of the tarsus in 20 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 147-153.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Beardsley SL, Schrader SC. Treatment of dogs with shearing wounds of the limbs caused by shearing forces: 98 cases (1975-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 1071-1075.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schmökel HG, Hartmeier GE, Kaser-Hotz B. et al. Tarsal injuries in the cat: A retrospective study of 21 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1994; 35: 156-162.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schmökel HG, Ehrismann G. The surgical treatment of talocrural luxation in nine cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001; 14: 46-50.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Matthiesen DT. Tarsal injuries in the dog and cat. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1983; 5: 548-555.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Theoret MC, Moens NM. The use of veterinary cuttable plates for carpal and tarsal arthrodesis in small dogs and cats. Can Vet J 2007; 48: 165-168.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 DeCamp CE, Martinez SA, Johnston SA. Pantarsal arthrodesis in dogs and a cat: 11 cases (1983-1991). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 1705-1707.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dyce J. Arthrodesis in the dog. In Practice 1996; 18: 267-274.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kirsch JA, Déjardin LM, DeCamp CE. In vitro mechanical evaluation on the use of an intramedullary pin-plate combination for pantarsal arthrodesis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 125-131.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lesser AS, Soliman SS. Experimental evaluation of tendon transfer for the treatment of sciatic nerve paralysis in the dog. Vet Surg 1980; 9: 72-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Miller A, Hulse D. Chapter 23 - The Tarsus. In: BSAVA manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal Disorders. Houlton J, Cook J, Innes J, Langley-Hobbs S. editors. Gloucester: BSAVA; 2006. p. 2006-396.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Fractures and Other Orthopaedic Injuries of the Tarsus, Metatarsus and Phalanges. In: Brinker, Piermattei and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Repair. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006. p. 2006-661.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. The hindlimb. In: An Atlas of surgical approaches to the bones and joints of the dog and cat. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 2004-376.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Schulz K. Diseases of Joints: Tarsus. In: Small Animal Surgery. Fossum TW. editor. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 2007-1301.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 McKee WM, May C, Macias C. et al. Pantarsal arthrodesis with a customised medial or lateral bone plate in 13 dogs. Vet Rec 2004; 154: 165-170.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Klause SE, Piermattei DL, Schwarz PD. Tarso-crural arthrodesis: complications and recommendations. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1989; 3: 119-124.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Guillou RP, Frank JD, Sinnott MT. et al. In vitro evaluation of medial plating for pantarsal arthrodesis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2008; 69: 1406-1412.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lewis DD, Radasch RM, Beale BS. et al. Initial clinical experience with the IMEX™ circular external skeletal fixation system. Part I: use in fractures and arthrodeses. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 108-117.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dyce J, Whitelock RG, Robinson KV. et al. Arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joint using a laterally applied plate in 10 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 19-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Meeson RL, Davidson C, Arthurs GI. Soft-tissue injuries associated with cast application for distal limb orthopaedic conditions. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 126-131.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hudson CC, Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 175-182.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Surgical approaches for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 316-320.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Schmökel HG, Stein S, Radke H. et al. Treatment of tibial fractures with plates using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 157-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Arens S, Kraft C, Schlegel U. et al. Susceptibility to local infection in biological internal fixation. Experimental study of open vs minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in rabbits. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119: 82-85.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Eugster S, Schwalder P, Gaschen F. et al. A prospective study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 542-550.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pozzi A, Lewis DD, Hudson CC. et al. Percutaneous plate arthrodesis in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 1079-1096.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Michal U, Flückiger M, Schmökel H. Healing of dorsal pancarpal arthrodesis in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2003; 44: 109-112.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Willer RL, Johnson KA, Turner TM. et al. Partial carpal arthrodesis for third degree carpal sprains a review of 45 carpi. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 334-340.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. General considerations. In: An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 2004-2.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Millis DL, Martinez SA. Bone Grafts. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2003. p. 2003-1876.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome and complications for clinical orthopaedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 905-908.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Calvo I, Farrell M, Chase D. et al. Carpal arthrodesis in cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 498-504.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Welch JA, Lesser AS. The Tarsus and Metatarsus & Arthrodesis. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2003. p. 2003-2158.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Roch SP, Clements DN, Mitchell RA. et al. Complications following tarsal arthrodesis using bone plate fixation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49: 117-126.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Johnson KA. A radiographic study of the effects of autologous cancellous bone grafts on bone healing after carpal arthrodesis in the dog. Vet Radiol 1981; 22: 177-183.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gorse MJ, Earley TD, Aron DN. Tarsocrural arthrodesis: long-term functional results. J Am Anim Hosp Asocc 1991; 27: 231-235.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Nunamaker DM. Methods of internal fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Nunamaker DM. editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1985. p. 1985-261.
    Google Scholar