An in vitro biomechanical investigation of an interlocking nail system developed for buffalo tibia

Summary

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the mechanical properties of a customized buffalo interlocking nail (BIN), intact buffalo tibia, and ostectomized tibia stabilized with BIN in different configurations, as well as to assess the convenience of interlocking nailing in buffalo tibia.

Methods: The BIN (316L stainless steel, 12 mm diameter, 250 mm long, nine-hole solid nails with 10° proximal bend) alone was loaded in compression and three-point bending (n = 4 each); intact tibiae and ostectomized tibiae (of buffaloes aged 5–8 years, weighing 300–350 kg) stabilized with BIN using 4.9 mm standard or modified locking bolts (4 or 8) in different configurations were subjected to axial compression, cranio-caudal three-point bending and torsion (n = 4 each) using a universal testing machine. Mechanical parameters were determined from load-displacement curves and compared using Kruskal-Wallis test (p <0.05).

Results: Intact tibiae were significantly stronger than BIN and bone-BIN constructs in all testing modes. The strength of fixation constructs with eight locking bolts was significantly more than with four bolts. Overall strength of fixation with modified locking bolts was better than standard bolts. Based on technical ease and biomechanical properties, cranio-caudal insertion of bolts into the bone was found better than medio-lateral insertion.

Clinical significance: The eight bolt BINbone constructs could be useful to treat tibial fractures in large ruminants, especially buffaloes.

Keywords

Biomechanical study - interlocking nail - buffalo tibia

• References

• 1 Martens A, Steenhaut M, Gasthuys F. et al. Conservative and surgical treatment of tibial fractures in cattle. Vet Rec 1998; 143: 12-16.
• 2 Aithal HP, Amarpal Kinjavdekar P. et al. Management of tibial fractures using a circular external fixator in two calves. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 621-626.
• 3 St-Jean G, Clem MF, DeBowes RM. Transfixation pinning and casting of tibial fractures in calves: Five cases (1985-1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 198: 139-143.
• 4 Aithal HP, Amarpal Kinjavdekar P. et al. Management of fractures near the carpal joint of two calves by transarticular fixation with a circular external fixator. Vet Rec 2007; 161: 193-198.
• 5 Yardimci C, Ozak A, Nisbet HO. Treatment of unilateral congenital flexural and torsional limb deformities with circular external skeletal fixation system in two calves. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 151-156.
• 6 Yardimci C, Ozak A, Nisbet HO. Correction of severe congenital flexural carpal deformities with semicircular external skeletal fixation system in calves. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 518-523.
• 7 Aithal HP, Singh GR, Hoque M. et al. The use of circular external skeletal fixation device for the management of long bone osteotomies in large ruminants: An experimental study. J Vet Med 2004; A51: 284-293.
• 8 Nicholas S, Anderson DE, Miesner MD. et al. Femoral diaphysis fractures in cattle: 26 cases (1994-2005). Aust Vet J 2010; 88: 39-44.
• 9 Stick JA, Derksen FJ. Intramedullary pinning of a fractured femur in a foal. J Am Med Assoc 1980; 176: 627-629.
• 10 Tee SY, Dowling BA, Dart AJ. Treatment of long bone fractures in South American camelids: 5 cases. Aust Vet J 2005; 83: 418-420.
• 11 Bernarde A, Diop A, Maurel N. et al. An in vitro biomechanical study of bone plate and interlocking nail in a canine diaphyseal femoral fracture model. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 397-408.
• 12 Moses PA, Lewis DD. Lanz et al. Intramedullary interlocking nail stabilization of 21 humeral fractures in 19 dogs and one cat. Aust Vet J 2002; 80: 336-343.
• 13 Duhautois B. Use of veterinary interlocking nails for diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 121 Cases. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 8-20.
• 14 Kyle RF, Schaffhausen JM, Bechtold JE. Biomechanical characteristics of interlocking femoral nails in the treatment of complex femoral fractures. Clin Orthop 1991; 267: 169-173.
• 15 Lansdowne JL, Sinnott MT, Dejardin LM. et al. In vitro mechanical comparison of screwed, bolted, and novel interlocking nail systems to buttress plate fixation in torsion and mediolateral bending. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 368-377.
• 16 Lopez MJ, Wilson DG, Vanderby R. et al. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of an interlocking nail system and dynamic compression plate fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 333-340.
• 17 Déjardin LM, Lansdowne JL, Sinnott MT. et al. In vitro mechanical evaluation of torsional loading in simulated canine tibiae for a novel hourglass shaped interlocking nail with a self-tapping tapered locking design. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 678-685.
• 18 Ting D, Cabassu JB, Guillou RP. et al. In vitro evaluation of the effect of fracture configuration on the mechanical properties of standard and novel interlocking nail systems in bending. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 881-887.
• 19 Déjardin LM, Guillou R, Ting D. et al. Effect of bending direction on the mechanical behaviour of interlocking nail systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 264-269.
• 20 Stephens TJ, Montgomery RD, Edmondson MA. Segmented interlocking nail: an in vivo evaluation of a novel humeral osteotomy fixation device in a caprine model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 28-35.
• 21 Freeman AL, Craig MR, Schmidt AH. Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture: Do screw quantity and locked interlocking screws make a difference. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: 333-339.
• 22 Sharir A, Barak MM, Shahar R. Whole bone mechanics and mechanical testing. Vet J 2008; 177: 8-17.
• 23 Beer FP, Johnston ER. Vector Mechanics for Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988
• 24 Schneider RK, Mills EJ, Gabel AA. et al. Multidirectional in vivo strain analysis of the equine radius and tibia with and without a cast. Am J Vet Res 1982; 43: 1541-1550.
• 25 Newton CD. Etiology classification and diagnosis of fractures. In: Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. editors. Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: JB Lippincott; 1985. p. 1985-185.
• 26 Smith GK. Biomechanics pertinent to fracture etiology, reduction, and fixation. In: Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. editors. Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: JB Lippincott; 1985. p. 1985-195.
• 27 Turner AS, Mills EJ, Gabel AA. In vivo measurement of bone strain in the horse. Am J Vet Res 1975; 36: 1573-1579.
• 28 McDuffee LA, Stover SM, Taylor KT. et al. An in-vitro biomechanical investigation of an interlocking nail for fixation of diaphyseal tibial fractures in adult horses. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 219-230.
• 29 Lopez MJ, Wilson DG, Trostle SS. et al. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two interlocking nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 246-252.
• 30 Galuppo Stover SM, Aldridge A. et al. An in vitro biomechanical investigation of an MP35N intramedullary interlocking nail system for repair of third metacarpal fractures in adult horses. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 211-225.
• 31 McDuffee LA, Stover SM, Taylor KT. An in vitro biomechanical investigation of the mechanical properties of dynamic compression plated osteotomized adult equine tibia. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 126-136.
• 32 McDuffee LA, Stover SM, Bach JM. et al. An in vitro biomechanical investigation of an equine interlocking nail. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 38-47.
• 33 Dueland RT, Berglund L, Vanderby R. et al. Structural properties of interlocking nails, canine femora, and femur-interlocking nail constructs. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 386-396.
• 34 Fitch GL, Galuppo LD, Stover SM. et al. An in vitro biomechanical investigation of an intramedullary nailing technique for repair of third metacarpal and metacarpal fractures in neonates and foals. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 422-431.
• 35 David PM, Nirmal CT. Biomechanics of external fixation: A review of the literature. Bull Hosp Joint Dis Ortho Inst 2007; 65: 294-299.
• 36 von Pfeil DJ, Déjardin LM, DeCamp CE. et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a plate-rod combination-construct and an interlocking nail construct for experimentally induced gap fractures in canine tibiae. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 1536-1543.
• 37 Muir P, Johnson KA, Markel MD. Area moment of inertia for comparison of implant cross-sectional geometry and bending stiffness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 146-152.
• 38 Schneider RK, Mills EJ, Gabel AA. Multidirectional in vivo strain analysis of the equine radius and tibia with and without a cast. Am J Vet Res 1982; 43: 1541-1550.
• 39 Reems MR, Pluhar GE, Wheeler DL. Ex vivo comparison of one versus two distal screws in 8-mm model 11 interlocking nails used to stabilize canine distal femoral fractures. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 161-167.