Biomechanical testing of a hybrid locking plate fixation of equine sesamoid osteotomies

Summary

Objective

To compare the biomechanical properties of a hybrid locking compression plate (LCP) construct with the compression screw technique as a treatment for transverse mid-body proximal sesamoid bone fractures.

Methods

Ten paired forelimbs from abattoir horses were used. The medial proximal sesamoid bone of each limb was osteotomized transversely and randomly assigned, to either repair with a two-hole 3.5 mm LCP or a 4.5 mm cortical screw placed in lag fashion. Each limb was tested biomechanically by axial loading in single cycle until failure. The point of failure was evaluated from the loaddisplacement curves. Then a gross evaluation and radiographs were performed to identify the mode of failure.

Results

The loads to failure of limbs repaired with the hybrid LCP construct (4968 N ± 2167) and the limbs repaired with the screw technique (3009 N ± 1091) were significantly different (p <0.01). The most common mode of failure was through a comminuted fracture of the apical fragment of the proximal sesamoid bone.

Clinical significance

The LCP technique has potential to achieve a better fracture stability and healing when applied to mid-body fractures of the proximal sesamoid bone. Further testing, particularly fatigue resistance is required to corroborate its potential as a treatment option for mid-body fractures of the proximal sesamoid bone.

Keywords

Mid-body fracture - proximal sesamoid bone - locking compression plate - biomechanics - horses

• References

• 1 Parkin TD. Epidemiology of racetrack injuries in racehorses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008; 24: 1-19.
• 2 Peloso JG, Mundy GD, Cohen ND. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, musculoskeletal racing injuries of thoroughbreds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 204: 620-626.
• 3 Johnson BJ, Stover SM, Daft BM. et al. Causes of death in racehorses over a 2 year period. Equine Vet J 1994; 26: 327-330.
• 4 Hernandez J, Hawkins DL, Scollay MC. Race-start characteristics and risk of catastrophic musculoskeletal injury in Thoroughbred racehorses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 83-86.
• 5 Anthenill LA, Stover SM, Gardner IA. et al. Risk factors for proximal sesamoid bone fractures associated with exercise history and horseshoe characteristics in Thoroughbred racehorses. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 760-771.
• 6 Nixon AJ. Phalanges and the Metacarpophalangeal and Metatarsophalangeal Joints. In: Auer JA, Stick JA. editors. Equine Surgery. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pg. 2012-1300.
• 7 Busschers E, Richardson DW, Hogan PM. et al. Surgical repair of mid-body proximal sesamoid bone fractures in 25 horses. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 771-780.
• 8 Martin Jr. BB, Nunamaker DM, Evans LH. et al. Circumferential wiring of mid-body and large basilar fractures of the proximal sesamoid bone in 15 horses. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 9-14.
• 9 Woodie JB, Ruggles AJ, Litsky AS. In vitro biomechanical properties of 2 compression fixation methods for midbody proximal sesamoid bone fractures in horses. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 358-363.
• 10 Eddy AL, Galuppo LD, Stover SM. et al. A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch compression and AO cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated midbody transverse fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone in horses. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 253-262.
• 11 Wilson DA, Keegan KG, Carson WL. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two fixation methods for transverse osteotomies of the medial proximal forelimb sesamoid bones in horses. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 355-367.
• 12 Sasaki N, Takakuwa J, Yamada H. et al. In vitro evaluation of allogeneic bone screws for use in internal fixation of transverse fractures created in proximal sesamoid bones obtained from equine cadavers. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 483-486.
• 13 Rothaug PG, Boston RC, Richardson DW. et al. A comparison of ultra-high-molecular weight polyethylene cable and stainless steel wire using two fixation techniques for repair of equine midbody sesamoid fractures: an in vitro biomechanical study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 445-454.
• 14 Nunamaker DM. General techniques and biomechanics. In: Fackelman GE, Auer JA, Nunamaker DM. editors. AO Principles of Equine Osteosynthesis Stuttgart: AO Publishing; 1999. pg. 1999-11.
• 15 Bertone AL. Fractures of the Proximal Sesamoid Bones. In: Nixon AJ. ed. Equine Fracture Repair. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders; 1996. pg. 1996-163.
• 16 Fackelman GE, Nunamaker DM, Auer JA. editors. AO Principles of Equine Osteosynthesis. Stuttgart: AO Publishing: 1999
• 17 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS. et al. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: When does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38: 358-364.
• 18 Bukowiecki CF, Bramlage LR, Gabel AA. In vitro strength of the suspensory apparatus in training and resting horses. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 126-130.
• 19 Anthenill LA, Gardner IA, Pool RR. et al. Comparison of macrostructural and microstructural bone features in Thoroughbred racehorses with and without midbody fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 755-765.
• 20 Wang D, Shi L, Griffith JF. et al. Comprehensive surface-based morphometry reveals the association of fracture risk and bone geometry. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 1277-1284.
• 21 Thompson KN, Cheung TK. A finite element model of the proximal sesamoid bones of the horse under different loading conditions. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 35-39.
• 22 Auer JA, Stick JA. Equine Surgery. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pg. 2012-1312.
• 23 Henninger RW, Bramlage LR, Schneider RK. et al. Lag screw and cancellous bone graft fixation of transverse proximal sesamoid bone fractures in horses: 25 cases (1983-1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 199: 606-612.