Risk factors for tibial tuberosity fracture after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs

A. E. Nutt; P. Garcia-Fernandez; F. San Roman; T. Parkin; I. Calvo

doi:10.3415/VCOT-14-02-0022

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(02): 116-123
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-02-0022

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Risk factors for tibial tuberosity fracture after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs

A. E. Nutt

¹Glasgow University Veterinary School, Division of Small Animal Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

,

P. Garcia-Fernandez

²Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Medicina y Cirugia Animal, Madrid, Spain

,

F. San Roman

²Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Medicina y Cirugia Animal, Madrid, Spain

,

T. Parkin

³Glasgow University Veterinary School, Division of Large Animal Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

,

I. Calvo

¹Glasgow University Veterinary School, Division of Small Animal Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

⁴Previous institution: University College Dublin, Section of Veterinary Sciences, School of veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To retrospectively identify factors that predispose to tibial tuberosity (TT) fracture after tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) in dogs.

Methods: The medical records and radio-graphs of a group of control dogs (n = 212) that had TTA surgery (n = 241 procedures) and did not sustain a fracture between 2008 and 2013, and those of 12 dogs that did sustain a fracture (n = 13 procedures) between 2008 and 2013 at two veterinary teaching hospitals were evaluated to determine the effect of signalment, body weight and surgical inaccuracies on TT fracture. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with the occurrence of TT fracture as the outcome variable of interest.

Results: Signalment and body weight were not found to be associated with TT fracture. Of the surgical inaccuracies, osteotomy shape (p = 0.003), plate position (p = 0.009), and cage position (p = 0.039) were factors significantly associated with TT fracture.

Clinical significance: This study provides data to support the hypothesis that poor plate position, poor cage position, and narrow distal osteotomy width are associated with TT fracture after TTA. We conclude that it is of paramount importance to pay careful attention to surgical technique in order to reduce this risk.

Keywords

Dogs - TTA - fracture - complication - tibial tuberosity - tibial tuberosity advancement

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Arnoczky SP. Pathomechanics of cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries. In Borjab MJ. editor Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1993: 764
2 Morris E, Lipowitz AJ. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 218: 363-366.
3 Slauterbeck JR, Pankratz K, Xu KT. et al. Canine ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy increases the prevalence of ACL injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 301-305.
4 Lapman TJ, Lund EM, Lipowitz AJ. Cranial cruciate disease: current status of diagnosis, surgery and risk for disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 122-126.
5 Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 1016-1019.
6 Wingfield C, Amis AA, Stead AC. et al. Comparison of the biomechanical properties of Rottweiler and racing Greyhound cranial cruciate ligaments. J Small Anim Pract 2000; 41: 303-307.
7 Hayashi K, Frank JD, Dubinsky C. et al. Histologic changes in ruptured canine cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 269-277.
8 Niebauer GW. Immunological changes in canine cruciate ligament rupture. Res Vet Sci 1982; 32: 235-241.
9 Tashman S, Aderst W, Kolowich P. et al. Kinematics of the ACL-deficient canine knee during gait: serial changes over two years. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 931-941.
10 Montavon PM, Damur DM, Tepic S. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress. 2002. September 5-8 Munich, Germany: 152.
11 Tepic S, Damur DM, Montavon PM. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress. 2002. September 5-8 Munich, Germany: 189-190.
12 Tepic S, Montavon PM. Is cranial tibial advancement relevant in the cruciate deficient stifle?. Proceedings of the 12th ESVOT Congress. 2004. September 10-12 Munich, Germany: 132-133.
13 Apelt A, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial subluxation in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joints: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 170-177.
14 Miller JM, Shires PK, Lanz OI. et al. Effect of 9 mm tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial translation in the canine cruciate ligament-deficient stifle. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 335-340.
15 Moore KW, Read RA. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog: a retrospective study comparing surgical techniques. Aust Vet J 1995; 72: 281-285.
16 Kipfer NM, Tepic S, Damur DM. et al. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on femorotibial shear in cranial cruciate-deficient stifles. An in vitro study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 385-390.
17 Dennler R, Kipfer NM, Tepic S. et al. Inclination of the patellar ligament in relation to flexion angle in stifle joints of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1849-1854.
18 Hoffmann DE, Miller JM, Ober CP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 219-227.
19 Lafaver S, Miller NA, Stubbs WP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 573-586.
20 Stein S, Schmoekel H. Short-term and eight to 12 months results of a tibial tuberosity advancement as treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament damage. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49: 398-404.
21 Hirshenson MS, Krotscheck U, Thompson MS. et al. Evaluation of complications and short-term outcome after unilateral or single-session bilateral tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate rupture in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 402-409.
22 Wolf RE, Scavelli TD, Hoelzler MG. et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 458 cases (2007-2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 240: 1481-1487.
23 Steinberg EJ, Prata RG, Palazzini K. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of CrCL injury: Complications and owner satisfaction. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2011; 47: 250-257.
24 Dymond NL, Goldsmid SE, Simpson DJ. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 92 canine stifles: initial results, clinical outcome and owner evaluation. Aust Vet J 2010; 88: 381-385.
25 Boudrieau RJ. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement?. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 1-22.
26 Bergh MS, Rajala-Schultz P, Johnson KA. Risk factors for tibial tuberosity fracture after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 374-82.
27 Calvo I, Yeadon R, Bennett D. Tibial tuberosity fracture as a complication of tibial tuberosity advancement: Risk factors. Proceedings of the 2011 BSAVA Congress. 2011. March 31 - April 3 Birmingham, UK: 442.
28 Calvo I, Yeadon R, Chase D. et al. Tibial tuberosity fracture as a complication of tibial tuberosity advancement: Risk factors and management. Proceedings of the III World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress. 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: pg 89.
29 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. Approach to the stifle joint through a medial incision. In: An Atlas of Approaches to the Bone and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004: 346-349.
30 Inauen R, Koch D, Bass M. et al. Tibial tuberosity conformation as a risk factor for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 16-20.
31 Hill's Petcare. Right weight for your breed. [Cited on 2014 January 16]. Available from http://www.hillspet.ie/en-ie/weight-management/dog.html#is-your-dog-in-good-shape
32 Calvo I, Aisa J, Chase D. et al. Tibial tuberosity fracture as a complication of tibial tuberosity advancement. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 148-154.
33 Proot LJL, Corr SA. Clinical audit for the tibial tuberosity advancement procedure. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 4: 280-284.
34 Cheung LK, Zhang Q, Wong MC. et al. Stability consideration for internal maxillary distractors. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31: 142-148.
35 Miranda MA. Locking plate technology and its role in osteoporotic fractures. Injury 2007; 38 S3 S35-S39.
36 Stariner DL. Breaking up is hard to do: The heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data. Can J Psychiatry 2002; 47: 262-266.
37 Baneshi MR, Talei AR. Dichotomisation of Continuous Data: Review of Methods, Advantages, and Disadvantages. Iran J Cancer Prev 2011; 1: 26-32.