PDF herunterladen
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(02): 88-94
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-03-0046
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Mechanical performance in axial compression of a titanium polyaxial locking plate system in a fracture gap model

A. W. Tomlinson
1   Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Cheshire UK
,
E. J. Comerford
1   Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Cheshire UK
2   Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
,
R. S. Birch
3   Centre for Materials and Structures, School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
,
J. F. Innes
4   ChesterGates Referral Hospital, Cheshire, UK
,
M. B. Walton
4   ChesterGates Referral Hospital, Cheshire, UK
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received:23. März 2014

Accepted:11. Februar 2014

Publikationsdatum:
26. Dezember 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objective: To evaluate the bending strength of the VetLOX® polyaxial locking plate system.

Materials and methods: Thirty-five 3.5 mm 12-hole titanium VetLOX® plates were used to stabilize seven different construct designs in a 1 cm fracture gap simulation model. Each construct was subjected to axial compression. Mean bending stiffness (BS) and yield load (YL) of each construct design were analysed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc analysis. Screw angulation was measured on reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images.

Results: Reducing plate working length for fixed-angle constructs significantly increased BS (p <0.01) and YL (p <0.01). For a constant plate working length, increasing screw number did not significantly affect BS (p = 1.0) or YL (p = 0.86). Screw angulation measurement technique was validated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (ICC >0.9 for inter- and intra-observer measurements). An average screw angle of 13.2° did not significantly affect mechanical performance although incomplete screw head-plate engagement was noted on some reconstructed CT images when angulation exceeded 10°. Prefabricated screw-head inserts did not significantly increase mechanical performance. A 4 mm bone-plate stand-off distance significantly reduced BS and YL by 63% and 69% respectively.

Clinical relevance: The VetLOX® system allows the benefits of polyaxial screw insertion whilst maintaining comparable bending properties to fixed angle insertion. The authors recommend accurate plate contouring to reduce the risk of plate bending.

Keywords

VetLOX - polyaxial - locking plate - Delrin rods - screw angulation
 

  • References

  • 1 Blake C, Boudrieau R, Torrance B. et al. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 408-417.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Barnhart MD, Rides CF, Kennedy SC. et al. Fracture repair using a polyaxial locking plate system (PAX). Vet Surg 2013; 42: 60-66.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cabassu JB, Kowaleski MP, Shorinko JK. et al. Single cycle to failure in torsion of three standard and five locking plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 418-425.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rutherford S, Ness MG. Effect of contouring on bending structural stiffness and bending strength of the 3.5 titanium SOP implant. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 983-987.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E. et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 488-493.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS. et al. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38: 358-364.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G. et al. Biomechanical testing of the LCP - how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34: 11-19.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Greiwe RM, Archdeacon MT. Locking plate technology: current concepts. J Knee Surg 2007; 20: 50-55.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl (Suppl. 02) B63-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Johnson A. Current concepts in fracture reduction. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 59-66.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hulse D, Hyman W, Nori M. et al. Reduction in plate strain by addition of an intramedullary pin. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 451-459.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bellapianta J, Dow K, Pallotta NA. et al. Threaded screw head inserts improve locking plate biomechanical properties. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: 65-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schmokel HG, Stein S, Radke H. et al. Treatment of tibial fractures with plates using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 157-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Guiot LP, Dejardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 171-182.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hoffmeier KL, Hofmann GO, Muckley T. Choosing a proper working length can improve the lifespan of locked plates. A biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26: 405-409.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chao P, Conrad BP, Lewis DD. et al. Effect of plate working length on plate stiffness and cyclic fatigue life in a cadaveric femoral fracture gap model stabilized with a 12-hole 2.4 mm locking compression plate. BMC Vet Res 2013; 91: 125.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Miller DL, Goswami T. A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22: 1049-1062.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 ASTM International. Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Bone Plates. West Conshohocken F382-99: ASTM International 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Filipowicz D, Lanz O, McLaughlin R. et al. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 270-277.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Reaugh HF, Rochat MC, Bruce CW. et al. Stiffness of modified Type 1a linear external skeletal fixators. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 264-268.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hudson CC, Lewis DD, Cross AR. et al. A biomechanical comparison of three hybrid linear-circular external fixator constructs. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 954-965.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Deiss R, Bali MS, Doherr M. et al. In vitro biomechanical testing of a micro external skeletal fixator. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 385-391.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Maxwell M, Horstman CL, Crawford RL. et al. The effects of screw placement on plate strain in 3.5 mm dynamic compression plates and limited-contact dynamic compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 125-131.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Irubetagoyena I, Verset M, Palierne S. et al. Ex vivo cyclic mechanical behaviour of 2.4 mm locking plates compared with 2.4 mm limited contact plates in a cadaveric diaphyseal gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 479-488.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ness MG. The effect of bending and twisting on the stiffness and strength of the 3.5 SOP implant. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 132-136.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bouvy BM, Markel MD, Chelikani S. et al. Ex vivo biomechanics of Kirschner-Ehmer external skeletal fixation applied to canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 194-207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ellis T, Bourgeault CA, Kyle RF. Screw position affects dynamic compression plate strain in an in vitro fracture model. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15: 333-337.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fulkerson E, Egol KA, Kubiak EN. et al. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques. J Trauma 2006; 60: 830-835.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bufkin BW, Barnhart MD, Kazanovicz AJ. et al. The effect of screw angulation and insertion torque on the push-out strength of polyaxial locking screws and the single cycle to failure in bending of polyaxial locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 186-191.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hebert-Davies J, Laflamme GY, Rouleau D. et al. A biomechanical study comparing polyaxial locking screw mechanisms. Injury 2013; 44: 1358-1362.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar