Complications of appendicular fracture repair in cats and small dogs using locking compression plates

Summary

Objective: Our objectives were: 1) to review the complications associated with stabilization of appendicular fractures in cats and small dogs using locking compression plates (LCP), and 2) to identify factors that could influence fixation construct stability.

Study design: Retrospective clinical study.

Materials and methods: Medical and radiographic records of cats and small dogs with appendicular fractures treated with LCP were reviewed. Only cases with adequate follow-up to document clinical union and cases for which complications appeared before the clinical union were included. Complications were classified as implant-related complications or other complications. Cases with implant-related complications were compared to cases with non-implant-related complications for differences in signalment (species, age, body weight, multiple fractures), fracture location and type (fractured bone, fracture localization, closed or open fracture), reduction method (open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF] or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis [MIPO]) and fixation evaluations (implant size, platebridging ratio, plate span ratio, working length, plate screw density, number of screws and cortices engaged per plate and per main fragment, ratio between screw and bone diameter at the narrowest aspect of the bone, and presence of ancillary fixation).

Results: Seventy-five fractures from 63 cats (64 fractures) and 10 dogs (11 fractures) met the inclusion criteria. Eight humeral, 13 radio-ulnar, 26 femoral, and 28 tibio-fibular fractures were treated. Primary repair of the fracture was performed using 2.0 mm and 2.4 mm LCP in 22 and 53 fractures, respectively. Overall and implant-related complications were encountered in 13 and seven of 75 fractures, respectively. Fixation failure was not significantly associated with any aforementioned factor considered in this study, and in particular, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of fixation failure between fractures stabilized with two, or more than two, bicortical locking screws per main fragment.

Clinical significance: 2.0 mm and 2.4 mm LCP were used to manage appendicular fractures in cats and small dogs. The overall complication and fixation failure rate were comparable to those reported in previous studies in which various locking plate systems were used.

Online Supplementary Material for this article is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-14-09-0146

Keywords

Dog - cat - fracture - locking compression plate - LCP

• References

• 1 Frigg R. Locking compression plate (LCP). An ostheosynthesis plate based on the dynamic compression plate and the point contact fixator (PC-Fix). Injury 2001; 32 (Suppl. 02) Suppl. B63-66.
• 2 Garofolo S, Pozzi A. Effect of plating technique on periosteal vasculature of the radius in dogs: a cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 255-261.
• 3 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: the scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg 2002; 84: 1093-1110.
• 4 Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl. 2 B31-42.
• 5 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for clinical application of LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) Suppl B63-B76.
• 6 Voss K, Kull MA, Hässig M. et al Repair of long-bone fractures in cats and small dogs with the Unilock mandible locking plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 398-405.
• 7 Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58: 453-458.
• 8 Hernanz GY, Diaz MA, Jara SF. et al Early results with the new internal fixator systems LCP and LISS: A prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg 2007; 73: 60-69.
• 9 Haaland PJ, Sjöström L, Devor M. et al Appendicular fracture repair in dogs using the locking compression plate system: 47 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 309-315.
• 10 Nicetto T, Petazzoni M, Urizzi A. et al Experiences using the Fixin locking plate system for the stabilization of appendicular fractures in dogs: a clinical and radiographic retrospective assessment. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 61-68.
• 11 Barnhart MD, Rides CF, Kennedy SC. et al Fracture repair using a polyaxial locking plate system (PAX). Vet Surg 2013; 42: 60-66.
• 12 Guerrero TG, Kalchofner K, Scherrer N. et al. The advanced locking plate system (ALPS): a retrospective evaluation in 71 small animal patients. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 127-135.
• 13 Field JR, Tornkvist H, Hearn TC. et al The influence of screw omission on construction stiffness and one surface strain in the application of bone plates to cadaveric bone. Injury 1999; 30: 591-598.
• 14 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G. et al Biomechanical testing of the LCP - how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) Suppl 11-19.
• 15 Hoffmeier KL, Hofmann GO, Mückley T. Choosing a proper working length can improve the lifespan of locked plates: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech 2011; 26: 405-409.
• 16 Chao P, Conrad BP, Daniel DL. et al Effect of plate working length on plate stiffness and cyclic fatigue life in a cadaveric femoral fracture gap model stabilized with a 12-hole 2.4 mm locking compression plate. BMC Veterinary Research 2013; 9: 125.
• 17 Boero Baroncelli A, Peirone B, Winter MD. et al Retrospective comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open plating for tibial fractures in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 410-417.
• 18 Guiot LP, DÉjardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 171-182.
• 19 Pozzi A, Hudson CC, Gauthier CM. et al. Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation of radius-ulna fractures in dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 19-27.
• 20 Pozzi A, Risselada M, Winter MD. Ultrasonographic and radiographic assessment of fracture healing after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation of radius-ulna fractures in dogs. J Am VetMed Assoc 2012; 15: 744-753.
• 21 Reems MR, Beale BS, Hulse DA. Use of a plate-rod construct and principles of biological osteosynthesis for repair of diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 47 cases. J. Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 330-335.