A comparative study of the dorsolateral and ventrolateral approaches for repair of canine sacroiliac luxation

Summary

Objectives: Retrospective comparison of dorsolateral (DLA) and ventrolateral (VLA) surgical approaches for treatment of canine sacroiliac luxation using three different radiographic analyses.

Methods: Surgical cases with immediate and ≥ 4 week postoperative radiographs were reviewed (Jan. 2000 to Jan. 2015). Exactness of reduction, screw position, and sacral body screw purchase were assessed with three separate methods: single plane assessment and orthogonal assessment with or without rotational limits.

Results: The reduction index (RI) for DLA and VLA was not significantly different with single plane assessment (p = 0.0789), but it was significantly greater for DLA than VLA with orthogonal assessment, with or without rotational limits (p = 0.0039, p = 0.0146). No differences were observed with screw placement into the intended location (single plane, and orthogonal assessment with or without rotational limits; p = 0.2941, p = 0.4151, p = 0.3550, respectively). No differences were observed between mean screw purchase index (SPI) and the 60% goal for the DLA (p = 0.1303, p = 0.9594, p = 0.7120) or 50% goal for the VLA (p = 0.2224, p = 0.1401, p = 0.2224; single plane, and orthogonal assessment with or without rotational limits). Implant loosening was present in four DLA cases and one VLA case. No differences were observed in the number of cases or number of screws that loosened (p = 0.3483 and p = 0.6873, respectively).

Clinical significance: The key factor demonstrated in maintaining screw and fixation stability was correct screw placement within the sacral body, regardless of the surgical approach.

Keywords

Sacroiliac luxation - dorsolateral approach - ventrolateral approach - implant failure

• References

• 1 DeCamp CE. Fracture-luxation of the sacroiliac joint. In Johnson AL. Houlton JEF. Vannini R. editors AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. Davos Platz: AO Publishing; 2005. pg. 164-169
• 2 DeCamp CE. Fractures of the pelvis. In Tobias KM. Johnston SA. editors. Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. Vol 1. St. Louis: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012. pg 809-813
• 3 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. Approach to the wing of the ilium and dorsal aspect of the sacrum. In An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. pg 278-281
• 4 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. Approach to the ventral aspect of the sacrum. In An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 4th Ed Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. pg 286-288
• 5 Montavon PM, Boudrieau RJ, Hohn RB. Ventrolateral approach for repair of sacroiliac fracture-dislocation in the dog and cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 186: 1198-1201.
• 6 DeCamp CE, Braden TD. Sacroiliac fracture-separation in the dog: A study of 92 cases. Vet Surg 1985; 14: 127-130.
• 7 Bowlt KL, Shales CJ. Canine sacroiliac luxation: Anatomic study of the craniocaudal articular surface angulation of the sacrum to define a safe corridor in the dorsal plane for placement of screws used for fixation in lag fashion. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 22-26.
• 8 DeCamp CE, Braden TD. The surgical anatomy of the canine sacrum for lag screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint. Vet Surg 1985; 14: 131-134.
• 9 Joseph R, Milgram J, Zhan K. et al In vitro study of the ilial anatomic landmarks for safe implant insertion in the first sacral vertebra of the intact canine sacroiliac joint. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 510-517.
• 10 Shales CJ, Langley-Hobbs SJ. Canine sacroiliac luxation: Anatomic study of dorsoventral articular surface angulation and safe corridor for placement of screws used for lag fixation. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 324-331.
• 11 Tonks CA, Tomlinson JL, Cook JL. Evaluation of closed reduction and screw fixation in lag fashion of sacroiliac fracture-luxations. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 603-607.
• 12 Radasch RM, Merkley DF, Hoefle WD. et al Static strength evaluation of sacroiliac fracture-separation repairs. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 155-161.
• 13 Tomlinson JL, Cook JL, Payne JT. et al Closed reduction and lag screw fixation of sacroiliac luxations and fractures. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 188-193.
• 14 Dyce J, Wisner ER, Schrader SC. et al Radiographic evaluation of acetabular component position in dogs. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 28-39.
• 15 Kaderly RE. Stabilization of bilateral sacroiliac fracture-luxations in small animals with a single transsacral screw. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 91-96.
• 16 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4th Ed St Louis: Saunders; 2006. pg 433-440