Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29(03): 214-219
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-05-0090
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of goniometric measurements of the stifle joint in seven breeds of normal dogs

Seyyid S. Sabanci
1   Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Kırıkkale, Turkey
,
Mehmet K. Ocal
2   Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Aydın, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
This article was prepared from a section of unpublished data of the first author's PhD thesis and was supported by a grant from the Scientific Research Projects of Adnan Menderes University (VTF-13016). The authors thank Professor Dr. Mehmet N. Orman, for his helpful comments on the statistical analyses, and Yirtimci Limited Company, Aydin-Turkey, for providing permission and training in the use of their SolidWorks software.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 29 May 2015

Accepted: 28 January 2016

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objective: To compare the goniometric measurements of the stifle joint in seven dog breeds, and to determine the relationship among goniometric measurements, age, body weight, tibial plateau angle, crus and thigh circumferences, and widths of quadriceps, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscles in healthy dogs.

Methods: We used a total of 126 dogs from seven different breeds, and recorded the angle of the stifle joint at standing, extension, and flexion together with the range of motion (ROM). The circumferences of the thigh and crus were also measured. Medio -lateral radiographic projections of the tibia and the femur were obtained from the dogs, and the tibial plateau angles, as well as the widths of quadriceps, hamstring, and gas -trocnemius muscles, were measured from these images.

Results: Neither the sex of the dog nor the differences in the side measured affected the goniometric measurements of the stifle joint. The standing, extension, flexion, and ROM angles were different among the breeds. The standard deviations of the standing and extension angles were small relative to their means, but the standard deviations of the flexion angle were large relative to their means in all breeds. Body weight and muscular measurements were the most influential factors on the stifle flexion angle and ROM.

Clinical significance: Breed differences, body weights, and muscle mass should be taken into consideration during assessment of the stifle function using goniometric measurements.

 
  • References

  • 1 Drum MG. Physical rehabilitation of the canine neurologic patient. Vet Clin Small Anim 2010; 40: 181-193.
  • 2 Davidson JR, Kerwin SC, Millis DL. Rehabilitation for the orthopedic patient. Vet Clin Small Anim 2005; 35: 1357-1388.
  • 3 Saunders DG, Walker JR, Levine D. Joint mobilization. Vet Clin Small Anim 2005; 35: 1287-1316.
  • 4 Jandi AS, Schulman AJ. Incidence of motion loss of the stifle joint in dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament rupture surgically treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: Longitudinal clinical study of 412 cases. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 114-121.
  • 5 MacDonald TL, Allen DA, Monteith GJ. Clinical assessment following tibial tuberosity advancement in 28 stifles at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Can Vet J 2013; 54: 249-254.
  • 6 Skinner OT, Kim SE, Lewis DD. et al. In vivo femorotibial subluxation during weight-bearing and clinical outcome following tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet J 2013; 196: 86-91.
  • 7 Agostinho FS, Rahal SC, Miqueleto NSML. et al. Kinematic analysis of Labrador retrievers and Rottweilers trotting on a treadmill. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 185-191.
  • 8 Drygas KA, McClure SR, Goring RL. et al. Effect of cold compression therapy on postoperative pain, swelling, range of motion, and lameness after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238: 1284-1291.
  • 9 Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D, Johnson AL. et al. Effect of the use of carprofen in dogs undergoing intense rehabilitation after lateral fabellar suture stabilization. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 239: 75-80.
  • 10 Au KK, Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D. et al. Comparison of short- and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitation and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 173-180.
  • 11 Moeller EM, Allen DA, Wilson ER. et al. Long-term outcomes of thigh circumference, stifle range-of-motion, and lameness after unilateral tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 37-42.
  • 12 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limb musculature of Labrador retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 380-389.
  • 13 Kunkel KAR, Basinger RR, Suber JT. et al. Evaluation of a transcondylar toggle system for stabilization of the cranial cruciate deficient stifle in small dogs and Cats. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 975-982.
  • 14 Innes JF, Barr ARS. Clinical natural history of the postsurgical cruciate deficient canine stifle joint: year 1. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 325-332.
  • 15 Allen MJ, Leone KA, Lamonte K. et al. Cemented total knee replacement in 24 dogs: Surgical technique, clinical results, and complications. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 555-567.
  • 16 Liska WD, Doyle ND. Canine total knee replacement: Surgical technique and one-year outcome. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 568-582.
  • 17 Liska WD, Marcellin-Little DJ, Eskelinen EV. et al. Custom total knee replacement in a dog with femoral condylar bone loss. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 293-301.
  • 18 Bright SR, May C. Arthroscopic partial patellectomy in a dog. J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52: 168-171.
  • 19 Bruce WJ. Multiple ligamentous injuries of the canine stifle joint: a study of 12 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 333-340.
  • 20 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 979-986.
  • 21 Sengoz SO, Timucin CM, Ozmen A. et al. Measurements of normal joint angles by goniometry in calves. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 120-123.
  • 22 Grierson J, Asher L, Grainger K. An investigation into risk factors for bilateral canine cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 192-196.
  • 23 Buote N, Fusco J, Radasch R. Age, tibial plateau angle, sex, and weight as risk factors for contralateral rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in Labradors. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 481-489.
  • 24 Cabrera S, Owen T, Mueller M. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with unilateral versus bilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 150 cases (2000-2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 889-892.
  • 25 Kiefer JE, Langenbach A, Boim J. et al. Single-stage bilateral tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of bilateral canine cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28: 215-219.
  • 26 Colborne GR, Good L, Cozens LE. et al. Symmetry of hind limb mechanics in orthopedically normal trotting Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 336-344.
  • 27 Adrian CP, Haussler KK, Kawcak C. et al. The role of muscle activation in cruciate disease. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 765-773.
  • 28 Ragetly CA, Griffon DJ, Mostafa AA. et al. Inverse dynamics analysis of the pelvic limbs in Labrador Retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 513-522.
  • 29 Monk ML, Preston CA, McGowan CM. Effects of early intensive postoperative physiotherapy on limb function after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with deficiency of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 529-536.
  • 30 Marsolais GS, Dvorak G, Conzemius MG. Effects of postoperative rehabilitation on limb function after cranial cruciate ligament repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 1325-1330.
  • 31 Thomas TM, Marcellin-Little DJ, Roe SC. et al. Comparison of measurements obtained by use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1974-1979.
  • 32 Lizaur A, Marco L. Cebrian R: Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1997; 79-B: 626-629.
  • 33 Malviya A, Lingard EA, Weir DJ. et al. Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: The importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 491-498.
  • 34 Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 889-896.
  • 35 Dismukes I D, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. et al. Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 300-305.
  • 36 Nicholson HL, Osmotherly PG, Smith BA. et al. Determinants of passive hip range of motion in adult Greyhounds. Aust Vet J 2007; 85: 217-221.
  • 37 Mann FA, Wagner-Mann C, Tangner CH. Manual goniometric measurement of the canine pelvic limb. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 189-194.
  • 38 Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ripani FR. et al. Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau. J Anat 2012; 221: 452-458.
  • 39 Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J. et al. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13: 193-196.
  • 40 Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2001; 6: 248-252.