Fixation of supraglenoid tubercle fractures using distal femoral locking plates in three Warmblood horses

Summary

Three horses that were presented with supraglenoid tubercle fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using distal femoral locking plates (DFLP). Placing the DFLP caudal to the scapular spine in order to preserve the suprascapular nerve led to a stable fixation, however, it resulted in infraspinatus muscle atrophy and mild scapulohumeral joint instability (case 1). Placing the DFLP cranial to the scapular spine and under the suprascapular nerve resulted in a stable fixation, however, it resulted in severe atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles and scapulohumeral joint instability (case 2). Placing the DFLP cranial to the scapular spine and slightly overbending it at the suprascapular nerve passage site resulted in the best outcome (case 3). Only a mild degree of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle atrophy was apparent, which resolved quickly and with no effect on scapulohumeral joint stability. In all cases, fixation of supraglenoid tubercle fractures using DFLP in slightly different techniques led to stable fixations with good long-term outcome. One case suffered from a mild incisional infection and plates were removed in two horses. Placement of the DFLP cranial to the scapular spine and slightly overbending it at the suprascapular nerve passage prevented major nerve damage. Further cases investigating the degree of muscle atrophy following the use of the DFLP placed in the above-described technique are justified to improve patient outcome.

Keywords

Scapula - supraglenoid tubercle - fracture - distal femoral locking plate - suprascapular nerve

• References

• 1 Leitch M. Review of treatment of tuber scapulae fractures in the horse. Journal of Equine Medicine and Surgery 1977; 1: 234-240.
• 2 Wagner PC, Watrous BJ, Shires GM. et al. Resection of the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula in a colt. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1985; 7: 36-41.
• 3 Adams SB. Surgical repair of a supraglenoid tubercle fracture in a horse. J Am Vet Medical Assoc 1987; 191: 332-334.
• 4 Fortier LA. Shoulder. In Auer JA, Stick JA. editors Equine Surgery. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pg 1379-1387
• 5 Stashak TS. Lahmheit. In Stashak TS. editor Adam's Lahmheit bei Pferden [Adam's Lameness in Horses] Hannover M. H. Schaper 2010; pg 486-785.
• 6 Dyson S. Sixteen fractures of the shoulder region in the horse. Eq Vet J 1985; 17: 104-110.
• 7 Myers V, Burt J. The radiographic location of epiphyseal lines in equine lims. Proc Am Ass equine Pract 1966; 12: 21-39.
• 8 Pankowski RL, Grant BD, Sande R. et al. Fracture of the supraglenoid tubercle treatment and results in five horses. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 33-39.
• 9 Bleyaert HF, Sullins KE, White NA. Supraglenoid tubercle fractures in horses. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1994; 16: 531-537.
• 10 Dart AJ, Snyder JR. Repair of a supraglenoid tuberosity fracture in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992; 201: 95-96.
• 11 Mez JC, Dabareiner RM, Cole RC. et al. Fractures of the greater tubercle of the humerus in horses: 15 cases (1986-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 230: 1350-1355.
• 12 Bleyaert HF, Madison JB. Complete biceps brachii tenotomy to facilitate internal fixation of supraglenoid tubercle fractures in three horses. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 48-53.
• 13 Doshi HK, Wenxian P, Burgula MV. et al. Clinical outcomes of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population using locking plates with minimally invasive approach. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2013; 4: 16-20.
• 14 Khursheed O, Wani MM, Rashid S. et al. Results of treatment of distal extra: articular femur fractures with locking plates using minimally invasive approach-experience with 25 consecutive geriatric patients. Musculoskelet Surg 2015; 99: 139-147.
• 15 Smith JR, Halliday R, Aquilina AL. et al. Distal femoral fractures: The need to review the standard of care. Injury 2015; 46: 1084-1088.
• 16 Syed AA, Agarwal M, Giannoudis PV. et al. Distal femoral fractures: long term outcome following stabilisation with the LISS. Injury 2004; 35: 599-607.
• 17 Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M. et al. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury 2001; 32: 32-47.
• 18 Weight M, Collinge C. Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3). J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 503-508.
• 19 Auer JA. Principles of Fracture Treatment. In Auer JA, Stick JA. editors Equine Surgery. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pg 1047-1080
• 20 MacKay RJ. Peripheral Nerve Injury. In Auer JA, Stick JA. editors Equine Surgery. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pg 720-727
• 21 Texhammar R. AO-Instrumentierung [AO Instrumentation]. In Texhammar R, Colton C. editors AO-Instrumente und -Implantate [AO Instruments and Implants]. Berlin: Springer; 2011. pg 49-433