Establishment of normal anatomical radial angles in cats

Summary

Objectives: 1) To describe a radiographic method for determination of joint orientation lines and anatomical joint angles in orthogonal planes of feline radii; 2) to establish a range of normal radial joint orientation angles and anatomical axes in a feline population; and 3) to assess the repeatability and reliability of this methodology.

Methods: The radial anatomical axis, elbow and carpal joint reference lines, and the intersecting angles of each: anatomical medial proximal (aMPRA) and lateral distal radial angles (aLDRA), anatomical caudal proximal (aCdPRA) and distal radial angles (aCdDRA), and sagittal procurvatum (SP) were determined on the orthogonal radiographs of 14 feline limbs. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was determined based on repeated independent readings by two observers using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the feline radii were: aMPRA 70.97 ± 3.38° (70.07 – 71.88°), aLDRA 91.72 ± 3.26° (90.84 – 92.59°), aCdPRA 100.5 ± 3.14° (99.62 – 101.3º), aCdDRA 79.95 ± 3.77° (78.94 – 80.96°) and SP 11.07 ± 1.87° (10.57 – 11.58°). The highest mean bias found for both observers was -1.6 to -1.8° for the angle aCdDRA. Sagittal procurvatum had the lowest mean bias for intra- and inter- observer.

Clinical significance: The results obtained showed that the methodology used in our study was repeatable and reliable. The values established for the normal radial anatomical angles are relevant for future use as a reference for surgical treatment of angular deformities, malunions, non-unions, comminuted fractures, and future orthopaedic research.

Supplementary material for this paper is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-02-0033.

Keywords

Anatomical axis - radial angles - radial pro -curvatum - cats

• References

• 1 Montavon PM, Voss K. Part 4: Introduction to muskuloskeletal injuries. In Montavon PM, Voss K, Langley-Hobbs SJ. editors Feline Orthopedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Disease. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier; 2009: 148-152.
• 2 Fox SM. Premature closure of distal radial and ulnar physes in the dog. I. Pathogenesis and diagnosis. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1984; 6: 128-139.
• 3 Balfour RJ, Boudrieau RJ, Gores BR. T-plate fixation of distal radial closing wedge osteotomies for treatment of angular limb deformities in 18 dogs. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 207-217.
• 4 Fox DJ, Tomlinson TL. Chapter 47: Principles of angular limb deformity correction. In Tobias KM, Johnston SA. editors Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. Vol. 1. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012: 657-668.
• 5 Fasanella F, Tomlinson J, Welihozkiy A. et al. Radiographic measurements of the axes and joint angles of the canine radius and ulna. In: Veterinary Orthopedic Society 37th Annual Conference Abstracts. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: A11
• 6 Voss K, Lieskovsky J. Trauma-induced growth abnormalities of the distal radius in three cats. J Feline Med Surg 2007; 9: 117-123.
• 7 Fox DB, Tomlinson JL, Cook JL. et al. Principles of uniapical and biapical radial deformity correction using dome osteotomies and the center of rotation of angulation methodology in dogs. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 67-77.
• 8 Johnson AL, Houlton J, Vannini R. AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. Davos Platz, Switzerland: Thieme / AO Publishing; 2005
• 9 Preston T, Glyde M, Hosgood G. et al. Morphometric description of the feline radius and ulna generated from computed tomography. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 991-999.
• 10 Verdugo MR.. et al. Kinetic and temporospatial parameters in male and female cats walking over a pressure sensing walkway. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9: 129