Evaluation of Intra- and Inter-observer Measurement Variability of a Radiographic Stifle Osteoarthritis Scoring System in Dogs

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the intra- and inter-observer measurement variability of an existing osteoarthritis (OA) stifle scoring system.

Methods Paired caudocranial and mediolateral canine stifle radiographs were selected randomly. A total of 15 assessment points were evaluated independently andgradedtwice (integer numericscale:1–4) at an interval of 2 weeks by three observers with different levels of experience. The grades for each of the 15 factors were summed to obtain the OA score for each patient.

Results The 15 independent assessment points measured by the three observers showed high reproducibility and low intra-observer variability. Inter-observer variability was also low (mean: 1.09 4.99, 95% CI [confidence interval]: –0.35 to 2.55). The most discordant ratings among the three observers involved sesamoid bones of gastrocnemius muscle (assessment point 11 of 15) and popliteal surface of femur (assessment point 10 of 15).

Clinical Significance A validated and feasible OA scoring method is prerequisite for reliable radiographic assessment of OA progression. The low overall inter- and intra-observer variabilities among the 15 independent measures of the OA scoring system presented herein support its feasibility for application in clinical practice as an objective tool for radiographic scoring of stifle OA.

Keywords

stifle joint - radiography - osteoarthritis - dogs - cruciate ligament disease

• References

• 1 Shires PK, Hulse DA, Liu W. The under-and-over fascial replacement technique for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a retrospective study. JAAHA 1984; 20: 69-77.
• 2 Au KK, Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D. et al. Comparison of short-and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitation and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (02) 173-180.
• 3 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-136.
• 4 Mager FW. Zur Kniegelenksarthrose des Hundes nach vorderer Kreuzbandruptur – ein retrospektiver Vergleich dreier Opera-tionsmethoden [dissertation]. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians University 2000
• 5 Günther KP, Sun Y. Reliability of radiographic assessment in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7 (02) 239-246.
• 6 Innes JF, Costello M, Barr FJ. et al. Radiographic progression of osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint: a prospective study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004; 45 (02) 143-148.
• 7 Gordon WJ, Conzemius MG, Riedesel E. et al. The relationship between limb function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs with stifle osteoarthrosis. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (05) 451-454.
• 8 Lazar TP, Berry CR, deHaan JJ. et al. Long-term radiographic comparison of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy versus extracapsular stabilization for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (02) 133-141.
• 9 Hurley CR, Hammer DL, Shott S. Progression of radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 295 cases (2001-2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 230 (11) 1674-1679.
• 10 Matis U, Brahm-Jorda T, Jorda C. et al. Radiographic evaluation of the progression of osteoarthritis after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in 93 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: A32.
• 11 Brahm T. Umstellungsosteotomie des Tibiaplateaus nach B. Slocum zur Behandlung der vorderen Kreuzbandruptur beim Hund – retrospektive Erhebungen bei 115 Fällen [dissertation]. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians University; 2004
• 12 Schnell EM. Drei Jahre Erfahrung mit einer modifizierten Kreuzbandplastik beim Hund [dissertation]. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians University; 1986
• 13 Chauvet AE, Johnson AL, Pijanowski GJ. et al. Evaluation of fibular head transposition, lateral fabellar suture, and conservative treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in large dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996; 32 (03) 247-255.
• 14 Mullen HS, Matthiesen DT. Complications of transposition of the fibular head for stabilization of the cranial cruciate-deficient stifle in dogs: 80 cases (1982-1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195 (09) 1267-1271.
• 15 Brunnberg L, Rieger I, Hesse EM. Sieben Jahre Erfahrung mit einer modifizierten „Over-the-Top“-Kreuzbandplastik beim Hund. Kleintierpraxis 1992; 37: 735-746.
• 16 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 01 8476 307-310.
• 17 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intra- and interobserver measurement variability of tibial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37 (03) 263-268.
• 18 Rayward RM, Thomson DG, Davies JV. et al. Progression of osteoarthritis following TPLO surgery: a prospective radiographic study of 40 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45 (02) 92-97.
• 19 Roemer FW, Eckstein F, Hayashi D. et al. The role of imaging in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2014; 28 (01) 31-60.
• 20 Morgan JP. Radiological pathology and diagnosis of degenerative joint disease in the stifle joint of the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1969; 10 (09) 541-544.
• 21 Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG. et al. A reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 275-297.
• 22 Cooper C, Cushnaghan J, Kirwan JR. et al. Radiographic assessment of the knee joint in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51 (01) 80-82.
• 23 Anderst WJ, Les C, Tashman S. In vivo serial joint space measurements during dynamic loading in a canine model of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13 (09) 808-816.
• 24 Ravaud P, Ayral X, Dougados M. Radiologic progression of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7 (02) 222-229.
• 25 Edamura K, Ueno F, Tanegashima K. et al. Practical use of weight-bearing standing radiography in dogs with rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. Poster session presented at: 25th Annual conference of the European college of veterinary surgeons. 2016 Jul 7-9; Lisbon, Portugal
• 26 Li J, Zhong Z, Lidtke R. et al. Radiography of soft tissue of the foot and ankle with diffraction enhanced imaging. J Anat 2003; 202 (05) 463-470.
• 27 Muehleman C, Zhong Z, Williams JM. et al. Diffraction enhanced X-ray imaging of the articular cartilage of experimental animals. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; February 10-13 2002 Dallas, TX p.365
• 28 Junker S, Krumbholz G, Frommer KW. et al. Differentiation of osteophyte types in osteoarthritis: proposal of a histological classification. Joint Bone Spine 2016; 83 (01) 63-67.
• 29 Innes JF, Barr ARS. Clinical natural history of the postsurgical cruciate deficient canine stifle joint: year 1. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39 (07) 325-332.
• 30 van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB. Osteophytes: relevance and biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15 (03) 237-244.
• 31 Croft P, Cooper C, Wickham C. et al. Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132 (03) 514-522.
• 32 Scott JC, Nevitt MC, Lane E. et al. Association of individual radiographic features of hip osteoarthritis with pain. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 81.
• 33 Felson DT, McAlindon TE, Anderson JJ. et al. Defining radiographic osteoarthritis for the whole knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1997; 05 (04) 241-250.
• 34 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Atlas of Standard Radiographs: The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism. Vol. 2. Oxford, UK: Black-well Scientific Publications; 1963
• 35 de Bruin T, de Rooster H, Bosmans T. et al. Radiographic assessment of the progression of osteoarthrosis in the contralateral stifle joint of dogs with a ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Rec 2007; 161 (22) 745-750.
• 36 Schnabl E, Reese S, Lorinson K. et al. Measurement of the tibial plateau angle in cats with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (02) 83-86.
• 37 Unis MD, Johnson AL, Griffon DJ. et al. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver variability and repeatability of tibial plateau angle measurements with digital radiography using a novel digital radiographic program. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (02) 187-194.
• 38 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (05) 471-478.
• 39 Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17 (02) 268-274.
• 40 Mayer W. Traumatische Sehnen- und Bandverletzungen am Kniegelenk des Hundes und der Katze: Behandlung und Ergebnisse in den Jahren 1983-1991 (dissertation). Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians University; 1993
• 41 Coetzee GL, Lubbe AM. A prospective study comparing two fascial reconstruction techniques to stabilise the cranial cruciate deficient stifle in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 82-90.
• 42 De Rooster H, Van Bree H. Use of compression stress radiography for the detection of partial tears of the canine cranial cruciate ligament. J Small Anim Pract 1999; 40: 573-576.
• 43 Lineberger JA, Allen DA, Wilson ER. et al. Comparison of radiographic arthritic changes associated with two variations of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 13-17.
• 44 Morgan JP, Voss K, Damur DM. et al. Correlation of radiographic changes after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate-deficient stifles with functional outcome. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 425-432.
• 45 Böddeker J, Drüen S, Meyer-Lindenberg A. et al. Computer-assisted gait analysis of the dog: Comparison of two surgical techniques for the ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 11-21.