Accuracy of Femoral Head and Neck Excision via a Craniolateral Approach or a Ventral Approach

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to compare the completeness of femoral head and neck removal via a craniolateral approach or a ventral approach when femoral head and neck excision (FHNE) is performed by a novice veterinarian.

Methods FHNE was performed on both femurs of 10 canine cadavers with each femur randomized by a coin toss to FHNE via the craniolateral or ventral approach. Computed tomography (CT) of the femurs was performed prior to and following FHNE. The volume of bone that should have been removed with an ideal FHNE, the percentage of this volume that remained following FHNE, time to complete the procedure and the number of technical errors were compared between the two groups.

Results No significant difference (p = 0.88) was found in the volume of bone that should have been removed with an ideal ostectomy when using the two approaches (craniolateral 3,814.7 ± 409.4 mm³; ventral 3,806.2 ± 479.4 mm³), mean excess residual femoral neck (craniolateral 6.0 ± 9.6%; ventral 4.8 ± 6.8%), mean duration of the procedure (craniolateral 19.3 ± 5.4 minutes; ventral 23.7 ± 5.6 minutes) or number of technical errors (craniolateral 0/10; ventral 1/10) between the craniolateral and ventral approach groups.

Clinical Relevance The completeness of bone removal was not significantly different when FHNE was performed by a novice veterinarian via a craniolateral or ventral approach.

Keywords

femoral head and neck excision - femoral head ostectomy - cadaver - dog

Author contributions

I. Holsworth and S. Franklin contributed to conception of the study. C. Blackford Winders and S. Franklin contributed to the study design. C. Blackford Winders, W. Vaughn, K. Birdwhistell and S. Franklin contributed to acquisition of data. C. Blackford Winders and S. Franklin contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted and revised the manuscript and approved submission.

• References

• 1 Vinayak A, Kerwin SC, Ward MP, Bahr A, Peycke LE, Mertens WD. Effects of femur position on radiographic assessment of completeness of femoral head and neck excision in medium- to large-breed dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67 (01) 64-69
• 2 Penwick RC. The variables that influence the success of femoral head and neck excision in dogs. Vet Med 1992; 87 (04) 325-333
• 3 Harasen G. The femoral head and neck ostectomy. Can Vet J 2004; 45 (02) 163-164
• 4 Fitzpatrick N, Pratola L, Yeadon R, Nikolaou C, Hamilton M, Farrell M. Total hip replacement after failed femoral head and neck excision in two dogs and two cats. Vet Surg 2012; 41 (01) 136-142
• 5 Grisneaux E, Dupuis J, Pibarot P, Bonneau NH, Charette B, Blais D. Effects of postoperative administration of ketoprofen or carprofen on short- and long-term results of femoral head and neck excision in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223 (07) 1006-1012
• 6 Off W, Matis U. Excision arthroplasty of the hip joint in dogs and cats. Clinical, radiographic, and gait analysis findings from the Department of Surgery, Veterinary Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany. 1997. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23 (05) 297-305
• 7 O'Donnell MD, Warnock JJ, Bobe G, Scholz RP, Wiest JE, Nemanic S. Use of computed tomography to compare two femoral head and neck excision ostectomy techniques as performed by two novice veterinarians. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (05) 295-300
• 8 DeAngelis M, Hohn RB. The ventral approach to excision arthroplasty of the femoral head. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1968; 152 (02) 135-138
• 9 Johnson KA. Piermattei's Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2014