Levels of Music Played by Caucasian and Filipino Musicians with and without Conventional and Musicians’ Earplugs

Abstract

Background:

Some musicians may play the music louder while using earplugs thus reducing the effectiveness of the hearing protection offered by earplugs. In addition, the dynamic range (DR) of the music may be altered because of the use of earplugs with negative impact on perceived quality of music. There are some cultural differences in attitudes toward loudness, which may lead to differences in the loudness of music played by musicians from different cultures.

Purpose:

To investigate the effect of the use of two different types of earplugs on the loudness and DR of music played by musicians of Caucasian and Filipino origins.

Research Design:

Quasi-experimental repeated measures design.

Study Sample:

Thirty six musicians with normal hearing within the age range of 18–49 yr. Fifteen were of Caucasian (eight men and 7 women) origin and 21 were of the Filipino (nine men and 12 women) origin.

Intervention:

All participants received a brief educational session, which included information on music-induced hearing loss, the benefit of using earplugs, and the correct procedures for inserting and removing earplugs. They played music in five different conditions (three min each): Trial 1 of conventional and musicians’ earplugs in random order, no earplug, and trial 2 of conventional and musicians’ earplugs in random order.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Maximum, minimum, average (average sound level measured over the measurement period; LAVG), and peak levels were recorded using a dosimeter while playing music in each of the five conditions. The DR was derived by subtracting the minimum values from the maximum values. A different measure of the dynamic range 2 (DR2) was derived by subtracting the LAVG value from the peak value. Mixed analyses of variance (ANOVA) (Cultural origin and Gender as nonrepeated variables) was performed on LAVG, DR, and DR2.

Results:

Based on the LAVG levels yielded by them, 42–61% of the musicians may be at risk for hearing loss. The mixed ANOVA revealed some main effects of culture and some significant interactions involving cultural origin, the plug conditions, type of earplugs, and trial number.

Conclusions:

Use of earplugs may vary the overall loudness of music, the DR, or the DR2 in some musicians depending on the type of earplugs and cultural origin, and the effect may change with practice.

Key Words

Caucasian - culture - earplugs - Filipino - hearing protection devices - loud music - musician

This project is funded by the 2015–2016 Wirt C. and Mae S. Belcher Graduate Education Award in the College of Education & Human Services at West Virginia University.

• REFERENCES

• ACGIH. 1995 1995–1996 threshold limit values (TLVs) for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices (BEIs). Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
• Brandfonbrener AG. 2009; History of playing-related pain in 330 university freshman music students. Med Probl Perform Art 24: 30-36
• Chesky K, Pair M, Yoshimura E, Landford S. 2009; An evaluation of musician earplugs with college music students. Int J Audiol 48 (09) 661-670
• Hoffman JS, Cunningham DR, Lorenz DJ. 2006; Auditory thresholds and factors contributing to hearing loss in a large sample of percussionists. Med Probl Perform Art 21: 47-58
• Juman S, Karmody CS, Simeon D. 2004; Hearing loss in steelband musicians. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131 (04) 461-465
• Keppler H, Dhooge I, Vinck B. 2015; Hearing in young adults. Part I: the effects of attitudes and beliefs toward noise, hearing loss, and hearing protector devices. Noise Health 17 (78) 237-244
• McIlvaine D, Stewart M, Anderson R. 2012; Noise exposure levels for musicians during rehearsal and performance times. Med Probl Perform Art 27 (01) 31-36
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration 1983. OSHA Instruction CPL2-2.35A, December 19, 1983 (update to the Field Operations Manual). Rockville, MD: Government Institutes, Inc;
• Rawool VW. 2012. a Conservation and management of hearing loss in musicians. In: Rawool VW. Hearing Conservation: In Occupational, Recreational, Educational, and Home Settings. New York: Thieme; 201-223
• Rawool VW. 2012. b Documenting hazardous noise levels and exposure. In: Rawool VW. Hearing Conservation: In Occupational, Recreational, Educational, and Home Settings. New York: Thieme; 24-49
• Rawool VW. 2012. c Hearing Protection and Enhancement Devices. In: Rawool VW. Hearing Conservation: In Occupational, Recreational, Educational, and Home Settings. New York: Thieme; 136-173
• Rodrigues MA, Amorim M, Silva MV, Neves P, Sousa A, Inácio O. 2015; Sound levels and risk perceptions of music students during classes. J Toxicol Environ Health A 78 13–14 825-839
• Schulz TY. 2011; Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses. Noise Health 13 (51) 152-162
• Widén SE, Holmes AE, Erlandsson SI. 2006; Reported hearing protection use in young adults from Sweden and the USA: effects of attitude and gender. Int J Audiol 45 (05) 273-280
• Yoshimura E, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Paul PM, Aerts C, Chesky K. 2008; Risk factors for playing-related pain among piano teachers. Med Probl Perform Art 23: 107-113