PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2016; 49(03): 340-349
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.197226
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

A 20-year experience in unilateral cleft lip repair: From Millard to the triple unilimb Z-plasty technique

Percy Rossell-Perry
1   Faculty of Human Medicine, Post Graduate Studies San Martin de Porres University, Lima, Peru
2   Outreach Surgical Center Lima Perú ReSurge International 145 N Wolfe Rd, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. August 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Background: This study describes a 20-year experience of treating patients with unilateral cleft lip. During this time, various techniques were used including Millard's technique and its modification and two types of geometrically designed procedures. The study objective was to compare surgical outcomes of different surgical techniques for unilateral cleft lip repair. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective audit of outcomes after unilateral cleft lip repair performed by a single surgeon since 1995. Of the 827 patients who underwent surgery, 277 met the criterion of having anthropometric measurements performed ≥1 year postoperatively. The patients were stratified into three groups according to cleft severity: incomplete, complete with less deficiency (3–6 mm difference between cleft and non-cleft lip height) and complete with more deficiency (>6 mm difference between cleft and non-cleft lip height). Anthropometric measurements, scar assessment and complications were recorded. Results: There were no differences in outcomes between Millard and Reichert-Millard techniques for incomplete unilateral cleft lip. For complete unilateral cleft lip and less tissue deficiency, lip symmetry was better using upper rotation advancement plus double unilimb Z-plasty than the Reichert-Millard technique. For complete unilateral cleft lip and more tissue deficiency, lip symmetry was better after triple unilimb Z-plasty than after upper rotation advancement plus double unilimb Z-plasty. Conclusions: We presented a 20-year experience performing unilateral cleft lip repair. An individualised classification system with corresponding surgical techniques was successfully used during this period. The individualised surgical protocol used in this study allowed us to achieve improved surgical outcomes.

KEY WORDS

Cleft lip repair - millard technique - unilateral cleft lip
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Millard Jr R. A primary camouflage of the unilateral hare-lip. In: Transactions of the International Society of Plastic Surgeons. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1957: 160-6
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Rossell-Perry P. Modification of Reichert’s technique based on natural landmarks and individual designs for unilateral repair of cleft lip. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2008; 42: 113-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y, Yoneda K, Nakanishi Y. Primary repair of an incomplete unilateral cleft lip: Avoiding an elongated lip and achieving a straight suture line. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51: 511-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rossell-Perry P, Gavino-Gutierrez AM. Upper double-rotation advancement method for unilateral cleft lip repair of severe forms: Classification and surgical technique. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22: 2036-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rossell-Perry P, Cotrina-Rabanal O. Surgical technique for unilateral cleft lip repair with short lateral segment. Peruvian Medical Archives 2010; 28: 168-76
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Rossell-Perry P. Book of Abstracts. Presented at the 10th International Congress on Cleft Lip and Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, Durban, South Africa; 6th September, 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Rossell-Perry P. New diagram for cleft lip and palate description: The clock diagram. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009; 46: 305-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rossell-Perry P, Caceres Nano E, Gavino-Gutierrez AM. Association between palatal index and cleft palate repair outcomes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16: 206-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rossell-Perry P, Gavino-Gutierrez A. New perspective in congenital cleft lip surgical management. Ibero Latin American Plastic Surgery Journal 2013; 39: 23-34
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Potter J. Some nasal tip deformities due to alar cartilage abnormalities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954; 13: 358-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cronin ED, Rafols FJ, Shayani P, Al-Haj I. Primary cleft nasal repair: The composite V-Y flap with extended mucosal tab. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 102-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Demke JC, Tatum SA. Analysis and evolution of rotation principles in unilateral cleft lip repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 313-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reddy GS, Webb RM, Reddy RR, Reddy LV, Thomas P, Markus AF. Choice of incision for primary repair of unilateral complete cleft lip: A comparative study of outcomes in 796 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 932-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sitzman TJ, Girotto JA, Marcus JR. Current surgical practices in cleft care: Unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 261e-70e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Holtmann B, Wray RC. A randomized comparison of triangular and rotation-advancement unilateral cleft lip repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 172-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chowdri NA, Darzi MA, Ashraf MM. A comparative study of surgical results with rotation-advancement and triangular flap techniques in unilateral cleft lip. Br J Plast Surg 1990; 43: 551-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lazarus DD, Hudson DA, van Zyl JE, Fleming AN, Fernandes D. Repair of unilateral cleft lip: A comparison of five techniques. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41: 587-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Losee JE, Selber JC, Arkoulakis N, Serletti JM. The cleft lateral lip element: Do traditional markings result in secondary deformities?. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 594-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fisher DM. Unilateral cleft lip repair: An anatomical subunit approximation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 61-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nordhoof S. The surgical technique for the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. Taipei: Noordhoff Craniofacial Foundation; 1997: p. 27-35
    Google Scholar
  • 21 van der Heijden P, Dijkstra PU, Stellingsma C, van der Laan BF, Korsten-Meijer AG, Goorhuis-Brouwer SM. Limited evidence for the effect of presurgical nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft on nasal symmetry: A call for unified research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 62e-71e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Abbott MM, Meara JG. Nasoalveolar molding in cleft care: Is it efficacious?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 659-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar